Trump Impeachment Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maximilian75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember when angry “college students” were calling for his impeachment…before his inauguration?
 
It’s more likely he would be gone based on his age than other reasons.

That’s why I thought it was pointless to speculate about his longevity.

All I know is… 4 more years or go home
 
BoomBoomMancini said:
He seems to hate the job, and if the latest reporting is true, he never wanted to win anyway. It was all a publicity stunt.
Click to expand...
I think this is just another laughable attempt by the media to discredit him. Why in the world would he spend a good chunk of his personal fortune, as well as all that time and effort, in the hopes that he’d lose? It strains credulity.
 
I personally think that the liberals will press for an impeachment as hard as they possibly can, but that it won’t go anywhere because they’ll be caught lying or otherwise having manufactured evidence against him.

If he chooses to run again, I full expect him to serve a second term; I don’t think the Democrats can recover their image well enough by 2020 to win voters back. They’ve made themselves a complete and utter laughingstock in the eyes of the everyman, who voted him in in the first place.
 
Because he anticipated making more money as a political figure/leader of the populist wing of the GOP. Plus he loves attention. He’s a raging narcissist.
 
How do you reconcile this with Trump’s historically low approval ratings and the fact that the Democrats are widely expected to pick up seats in 2018? Your “opinion” seems like wishful thinking untethered from reality, frankly.
 
BoomBoomMancini said:
Because he anticipated making more money as a political figure/leader of the populist wing of the GOP
Click to expand...
That’s silly. He’s refused his Presidential pay, even. Not buying it for a second.
BoomBoomMancini said:
Plus he loves attention. He’s a raging narcissist.
Click to expand...
Possibly. That’s just a reason for him to win the Presidency, though, not lose it.
BoomBoomMancini said:
How do you reconcile this with Trump’s historically low approval ratings and the fact that the Democrats are widely expected to pick up seats in 2018? Your “opinion” seems like wishful thinking untethered from reality, frankly.
Click to expand...
The survey for his approval ratings seems pretty targeted towards those who hate him already. And my “opinion” (why is that in airquotes? Is my opinion not real, somehow?) is just as valid as anyone else’s. I direct you to November 2016 and the “tethered” opinions of everyone who said that Hillary would easily take the White House. Methinks the Dems are in for another rude awakening in 2018 and 2020 if they keep doubling-down on their alt-left rhetoric.
 
Maximilian75 said:
40.png
pianistclare:
I vote none of the above.
Click to expand...
What have I not covered?
Click to expand...
Lots, but to name one:

☑️ I see no point in forecasting. I will wait and see.
 
BoomBoomMancini said:
Oh, don’t worry. He’s more than compensated himself for that little gesture.
Click to expand...
His net worth has significantly decreased, actually. The far left can’t seem to stop hooting and screeching about it, though I’m not sure why.
 
Last edited:
Raxus said:
His net worth has significantly decreased, actually. The far left can’t seem to stop hooting and screeching about it, though I’m not sure why.
Click to expand...
Since becoming President? How can you even tell? Has he opened the books on his finances, finally?

If you mean it’s widely rumored that Trump isn’t nearly as rich as he claims, and has a pretty spotty record as a businessman, well, yeah.
 
BoomBoomMancini said:
Since becoming President? How can you even tell? Has he opened the books on his finances, finally?
Click to expand...
I thought it was fairly common knowledge: http://time.com/money/4985883/trump-net-worth-richest-americans-forbes-billionaires/
BoomBoomMancini said:
If you mean it’s widely rumored that Trump isn’t nearly as rich as he claims, and has a pretty spotty record as a businessman, well, yeah.
Click to expand...
He’s good enough to remain super-rich. ~shrug~
 
lilypadrees said:
Only one year? You mean we have THREE more years of him and his ego?
Click to expand...
In spite of promises made during his campaign, he doesn’t seem to be an old dog prone to learn any new tricks. The odds of any scenario that would remove him from office before his term ends are slim. That would imply “yes, most probably we do have three more years to look forward to, like it or not.”

Actually, if you want to be realistic, he is far more likely to serve a full 8 years than to serve less than his remaining three. People say he is horrible (including me), but they haven’t seen who he’ll be running against. The only upside for those who want him out is that this time around name recognition may not be anything like an advantage. (Consider the number of people feeling very unfavorable towards essentially everyone in politics, I’d actually put money on a relative unknown of either party over a well-known name.)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top