D
dvdjs
Guest
I hope that the posts after yours on this thread have helped you to correct your thinking.This is blatantly false
I hope that the posts after yours on this thread have helped you to correct your thinking.This is blatantly false
Great link, thanks.Ad hominem
should give you some considerable pause …Regarding the ad hominem, Walton contends that although such attacks are usually fallacious, they can be legitimate when a character critique is directly or indirectly related to the point being articulated.
Support her for what?Does Hilary have flaws and do you or did you support her??? that is the question?
And then, there is the issue of mishandling classified information … for which intent is not a mitigating factor.Why do you think Hillary lost and what does that tell you?
Sure. Mens rea, scienter, these are not part of our legal system.for which intent is not a mitigating factor.
Why would anyone make up inconsistencies in your bc?If there were this many inconsistencies
You claim inconsistencies. Are they real?HY are there these inconsistencies in HIS birth certificate???
About as cogent as your ridiculous assertion that people who voted for Trump are misogynist racists.qui_est_ce:![]()
Do you have a cogent remark?What a hoot.
Please refer to @Theo520’ s ladder if needed.
Right. She also accused women who did not vote for her as not being able to think for themselves.qui_est_ce:![]()
She did not label anyone. She called out the racists, sexists, homophobes, and Islamophobes.Or those she labelled as such.