J
Jeanne_S
Guest
Yes,that’s correct.It’s in plain sight
Indeed… and that is not even the worst possibility. There are some people, who would cheer him on, like: “Good job Mr President… now lock them up, or even better, hang them high!” Nothing is impossible for some people.That is quite plausible.
And the lack of evidence is a perfect proof that it was performed by really professional traitors, who were able to wipe the evidence away - totally and completely. Is that not the obvious, most plausible solution for this “mystery”?There was such massive fraud, in plain sight, but without any proof, no evidence.
It’s like Ernie’s blank piece of paper.
90 seconds of an hours-long video. And you don’t question why so little of it was released?Just yesterday a video was released re poll watchers pulling boxes of ballots from under the tables after they supposedly closed down and stopped voting.fraud in plain sight yet those of you who cling to this being on the up and up are fooling yourselves
Already debunked by the elections officials.90 seconds of an hours-long video. And you don’t question why so little of it was released?
He really doesn’t want to leave the Whitehouse. This has got to be one of the worst cases of squatting in USA history.Ohio tea party leader urges Trump to suspend the Constitution
Based on the high frequency of allegations that haven’t panned out(false positives), I’m not quite sure that a lot of people would know how to recognize the elements of fraud.Nothing will convince me other than a through accurate investigation into what looks to be a widespread fradulant effort to steal the electionfrom Trump
They are not rumors. We have retired Generals, Lawyers, and Politicians requesting this of the President.Let’s return to the original topic, rumors of martial law.
That would entail Mutiny.and they won’t follow a madman.
I don’t think he would try it, but if he did I don’t see the military going along with it.Let’s return to the original topic, rumors of martial law.
Not going to happen. It makes no difference that Trump is the Commander-in-Chief of the US military. The military still has to obey US laws, and they won’t follow a madman.
General Flynn said this. I don’t know who you are calling a madman.Not going to happen. It makes no difference that Trump is the Commander-in-Chief of the US military. The military still has to obey US laws, and they won’t follow a madman.
If I have time, I’ll look it up, but at this time I strongly suspect that the term “mutiny” does not apply, as you have used it, to the relationship between the US President and the Armed Forces.That would entail Mutiny.
It is not unheard of.I don’t think he would try it, but if he did I don’t see the military going along with it.
We have Notorious examples include Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of U.S. citizens and residents of Japanese descent during World War II and George W. Bush’s programs of warrantless wiretapping and torture after the 9/11 terrorist attacks,” the Atlantic reported. “Abraham Lincoln conceded that his unilateral suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was constitutionally questionable, but defended it as necessary to preserve the Union.”
Giving ostensibly unlawful orders is not unheard of, nor is following such orders. Ordering the military to take over the country and essentially install a military dictatorship is not something the US military will go along with. If Trump moves that direction, he will quickly find himself in a lonely place.It is not unheard of.
You mean, you don’t even know who said this and you are calling people madmen?? It’s been all over the law, I think this story has been posted two times here.Source?
Scott O’Grady, a former fighter pilot and Trump loyalist, repeatedly retweeted tweets that falsely stated Trump won the election in “landslide fashion” and that millions of votes were stolen from the President.
On November 25, O’Grady retweeted a tweet that said, “Trump won & Biden & his Comrades will now attempt a coup,” next to a photoshopped image of Biden beside Xi J(name removed by moderator)ing, the President of China.
On December 2, he retweeted an account that shared an article that said former national security adviser Michael Flynn had shared a petition that called for martial law. He then retweeted the same account which suggested that Trump should declare martial law.
No. I was saying that if a US President ordered the military to do something unconstitutional or illegal, of sufficient gravity, he would be a madman, and the military would not be required under US or moral law to carry out his orders.You mean, you don’t even know who said this and you are calling people madmen?