Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Peter_J said:
It’s always a bit painful listening to a Trump propagandist – even *more *so IMO if he/she is a professional. I wish I knew how many letters FoxNews has received asking them not to put Eric Bolling on the air anymore.

But I have no problem with Trump doing the lawsuit. (I wonder if he’ll also sue South Carolina for giving 100% of their delegates to a candidate who received 32.5% of the vote?)
Click to expand...
It might be interesting if the courts did take up the way primaries are run since just about all violate “one person, one vote”.
 
didymus said:
It might be interesting if the courts did take up the way primaries are run since just about all violate “one person, one vote”.
Click to expand...
They do, but political parties are, themselves, private organizations. And one would think as such they should be able to choose their candidates in whatever manner they wish. Primaries do have some good to them, but they also can result in a total thwarting of the will of the actual party members.
 
Peter_J said:
#AntiTrumpPropaganda

😉
Click to expand...
No, my friend, *this *is anti-Trump propaganda: :eek:

nationalreview.com/corner/433348/trump-defector-parts-curtain-donald

xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector
I don’t think even Trump thought he would get this far. And I don’t even know that he wanted to, which is perhaps the scariest prospect of all. He certainly was never prepared or equipped to go all the way to the White House, but his ego has now taken over the driver’s seat, and nothing else matters. The Donald does not fail. The Donald does not have any weakness. The Donald is his own biggest enemy . . . Trump acts as if he’s a fictional character. But like Hercules, Donald Trump is a work of fiction.
Click to expand...
My guess is Trump’s lawyers have already filed the defamation lawsuit earlier today. Good for Stephanie, and I, for one, will contribute to her legal fees. 😉 😃
 
FollowChrist34 said:
No, my friend, *this *is anti-Trump propaganda: :eek:

nationalreview.com/corner/433348/trump-defector-parts-curtain-donald

xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector

My guess is Trump’s lawyers have already filed the defamation lawsuit earlier today. Good for Stephanie, and I, for one, will contribute to her legal fees. 😉 😃
Click to expand...
Trump and his threatened lawsuits are part of the proof that business practices do not translate to politics. None of the other politicians hide and threaten lawsuits. None ever did. They just shake it off and move on.
 
FollowChrist34 said:
No, my friend, *this *is anti-Trump propaganda: :eek:

nationalreview.com/corner/433348/trump-defector-parts-curtain-donald

xojane.com/issues/stephanie-cegielski-donald-trump-campaign-defector

My guess is Trump’s lawyers have already filed the defamation lawsuit earlier today. Good for Stephanie, and I, for one, will contribute to her legal fees. 😉 😃
Click to expand...
You are guessing trump’s suing her?

You are saying that like it’s a fact, and then Lily picks up on your pseudo fact and takes it further, claiming it shows how business practices don’t translate into politics, all the while when we don’t even know if Trump has sued her. In fact I did a search there is no indication whatsoever Trump has sued her.

See how lies are being created here?
 
queenofheartscv said:
And in Ted Cruz’s case with the National Inquirer, he absolutely should threaten to sue, unless, of course, he doesn’t want to for some reason.
Click to expand...
So for Cruz and Trump, the good of the nation, has come down to insults and threats to sue? How does that benefit any Americans other than themselves?

Shouldn’t they be hitting the books on foreign policy for upcoming debates with the Democratic nominee.
 
Lily_Bernans said:
So for Cruz and Trump, the good of the nation, has come down to insults and threats to sue? How does that benefit any Americans other than themselves?

Shouldn’t they be hitting the books on foreign policy for upcoming debates with the Democratic nominee.
Click to expand...
Platitudes may sound good, but life is messy. If someone such as the National Inquirer accuses you of murdering someone, which you have not done, and your reputation, your job, and your family’s reputation are at stake, it’s probably a good idea to sue.

meanwhile you can still talk about foreign policy.
 
Lily_Bernans said:
So for Cruz and Trump, the good of the nation, has come down to insults and threats to sue? How does that benefit any Americans other than themselves?

Shouldn’t they be hitting the books on foreign policy for upcoming debates with the Democratic nominee.
Click to expand...
👍
 
Lily_Bernans said:
So for Cruz and Trump, the good of the nation, has come down to insults and threats to sue? How does that benefit any Americans other than themselves?

Shouldn’t they be hitting the books on foreign policy for upcoming debates with the Democratic nominee.
Click to expand...
Well, you can certainly understand that Senator Cruz would want to sue if the allegations against him are false. But Cruz has lied so much (Carson’s dropping out; Rubio’s dropping out), who really believes him if he says the allegations are false anyway?

As far as the rest, it isn’t like there is a great debate going on about the future of conservatism in the United States between the remaining candidates. So, they are trading insults about each other’s wives.
 
queenofheartscv said:
And in Ted Cruz’s case with the National Inquirer, he absolutely should threaten to sue, unless, of course, he doesn’t want to for some reason.
Click to expand...
That would be to focus on the election…unless the frontrunner wishes to drop out, of course. :)😉
 
SuperLuigi said:
That would be to focus on the election…unless the frontrunner wishes to drop out, of course. :)😉
Click to expand...
Instead of saying once and for all he never has been unfaithful to his wife, cruz has chosen to not “focus on the election,” but focus on framing trump as being involved in writing the story. 🙂

Cruz cannot say this simple sentence: no I have not cheated on my wife.

Maybe that’s why he can’t sue.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3513200/Ted-Cruz-dodges-question-s-faithful-wife-endorser-Carly-Fiorina-leaps-insist-declaration-s-not-adulterer-dance-Donald-trump-s-tune.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top