Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly! How can a man be expected to “make deals” on behalf of country
Deaf dumb and blind would do better than Obama with National security and foreign policy and war. A fool can get lucky too and come out better than that horror show.

It won’t take much in other words to do better, 😉
 
Exactly! How can a man be expected to “make deals” on behalf of country if he can’t even come to terms with 2 women he promised to love until death do they part.
Both his exwives support him for president.

I can say more but I will refrain.
 
Deaf dumb and blind would do better than Obama with National security and foreign policy and war. A fool can get lucky too and come out better than that horror show.

It won’t take much in other words to do better, 😉
So as a Catholic you’d have no issue voting for a man that holds no respect for marriage?
 
The amount of bashing Lily takes on these forums is nothing short of shameful.

What exactly are you hoping to accomplish through derogatory comments?
Thats your opinion, she is wrong and quite obviously, sorry your reduced to this no point and what I feel is another double standard. So your new improved argument is now a personal attack and Ad Hominem thus another fallacy and usual position and path of a failed argument
 
So as a Catholic you’d have no issue voting for a man that holds no respect for marriage?
What you quoted Of trump saying is similar to what’s in the bible: it’s better to live on the corner of a roof than to share the house with a quarrelsome wife. Proverbs 21:9.
 
Deaf dumb and blind would do better than Obama with National security and foreign policy and war. A fool can get lucky too and come out better than that horror show.

It won’t take much in other words to do better, 😉
So what would you have done differently? Would you have started some more wars or invaded Syria or bombed Iran? Give us some specifics.
 
I can only repeat what Jim said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Whoever is elected as the next president, you will miss Obama.”

Remember his words.
 
Both his exwives support him for president.

I can say more but I will refrain.
I wondered how long it would take the great trump defender to jump back in 😃

Their support of his presidential run isn’t surprising. When you’re a billionaire it’s pretty easy to get people to say whatever you want, right? Just add a little money grease.

If marriage is something we Catholics hold so dear, why should we vote for someone that spits on it, and advises other men to do the same?
 
So as a Catholic you’d have no issue voting for a man that holds no respect for marriage?
And to think you have no problem praising the wisdom of Obama who supports abortion and gay marriage!
 
What you quoted Of trump saying is similar to what’s in the bible: it’s better to live on the corner of a roof than to share the house with a quarrelsome wife. Proverbs 21:9.
So you believe in divorce and multiple marriages? You’re defending it with the Bible?

How does anyone here know it was the wife who was quarrelsome and not Trump who was in the wrong?
 
So as a Catholic you’d have no issue voting for a man that holds no respect for marriage?
Wow, this you think is a point after all that with Lilly that this is not a theocracy rap? Are you even remotely serious with this dialogue now? Voting for Obama and Hillary and the culture of death and war and the war on the Church is out. I hope you comprehend this. But I see your personal attack continues. Whats respect does Obama and Hillary have for traditional marriage? That would he oh, none? Not a very good point.
 
Two conservative views:

“And remember that while Trump’s loyalties may be in flux, Hillary’s are the fixed and doctrinaire values of a devout Democrat. And here there will be no uncertainties. “That party promotes everything that is evil.””

–Peter Maurice, Is Electing Trump Really Unthinkable?

“If Trump is the Republican nominee, I will still show up on election day to support a third-party candidate and to vote for down-ticket candidates in an effort to prevent the Democrats from gaining complete, unencumbered control of the nation. I certainly will not vote for Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. But I can’t change the fact that, in voting for Trump, I would have voted for Donald Trump.”

Rachel Lu, Electing Donald Trump Should Be Unthinkable
 
I wondered how long it would take the great trump defender to jump back in 😃

Their support of his presidential run isn’t surprising. When you’re a billionaire it’s pretty easy to get people to say whatever you want, right? Just add a little money grease.

If marriage is something we Catholics hold so dear, why should we vote for someone that spits on it, and advises other men to do the same?
Based on experience, don’t expect them to answer. 😉
 
Wow, this you think is a point after all that with Lilly that this is not a theocracy rap? Are you even remotely serious with this dialogue now? Voting for Obama and Hillary and the culture of death and war and the war on the Church is out. I hope you comprehend this. But I see your personal attack continues.
LOL It’s not a Roman Catholic theocracy, and that is simply a fact you have to live with.
 
So you believe in divorce and multiple marriages? You’re defending it with the Bible?

How does anyone here know it was the wife who was quarrelsome and not Trump who was in the wrong?
We already know Trump’s approach to marriage: “I’m not a great believer in always trying to work things out".
 
Thats your opinion, she is wrong and quite obviously, sorry your reduced to this no point and what I feel is another double standard. So your new improved argument is now a personal attack and Ad Hominem thus another fallacy and usual position and path of a failed argument
I made no argument, I simply made a statement of opinion.

P.S. Maybe lay off the logical fallacy talk. It makes you sound like you just got out of a university philosophy class. 😉
 
LOL It’s not a Roman Catholic theocracy, and that is simply a fact you have to live with.
A fact I am obviously aware of you must be now speaking to others confused about this. However, religious freedom is in fact what you and I have been discussing and where you ran out of logic. LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top