Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Theo520 said:
So that’s your projection but we have no supporting evidence to date of her opponents using this tactic.

.
Click to expand...
Trump himself called for his supporters to start attending Sander’s rallies and do to him what was done at Trump rallies.

Being the agitators were proven to be from moveon.org, when Sanders is out and the GE campaign starts, you can bet its gonna get more dirty than its been and Trump will have no problem with his supporters heckling Hillary.

Jim
 
SuperLuigi said:
Ted Cruz is more viable option because he has a pretty consistent record on core principles and has a better chance of winning.
Click to expand...
Ted Cruz is a dirty politician who fabricated the message sent out to voters in Iowa, that Carson was dropping out.

He also sent out what looked like a government form to people in New Hampshire, identifying their neighbors and their support for Ted Cruz. It was all a lie and people were upset that their names were used in his dirty scheme, which failed.

Then lets not forget him talking to an empty room for 23 hours, because he didn’t like the rule change on filing a filibuster on a proposed piece of legislation that the minority party could not defeat.

I don’t want this type of person near the presidency, and the same goes for Hillary, who also runs dirty campaigns.

Jim
 
Seamus_L said:
It’s time for a crackdown on Facebook, which is now being used to organize violent protests. If the police cannot control anti=Trump demonstrators in Utah and Arizona, what happens when the Trump campaign comes to New York, Connecticut, and Delaware next month ?
Click to expand...
Heck, what will happen if he becomes president ?

Will we see more and more violent protests until we have a mini-civil war ?

Jim
 
JimR-OCDS said:
Trump himself called for his supporters to start attending Sander’s rallies and do to him what was done at Trump rallies.

Being the agitators were proven to be from moveon.org, when Sanders is out and the GE campaign starts, you can bet its gonna get more dirty than its been and Trump will have no problem with his supporters heckling Hillary.

Jim
Click to expand...
Right. The leader of the campaign sets the tone. Cruz is not having these issues in Arizona. His immigration policy on paper is actually harsher than Trump’s; he is down at the border today. (though I don’t think he would build a wall anymore than anyone else will) For some reason, the radical left take a real snooze at the prospect of protesting Cruz…:confused:

I would hazard a guess that is because Cruz is running a responsible, issue based campaign and maintaining proper decorum, not personally, obsessively attacking female members of the media, not calling for deportation of rapist Mexicans, banning all Muslims, taking opponents out on stretchers, paying legal fees for those who knock them unconscious, threatening riots at the convention if he is not given the nomination etc. etc…but I could just be channeling my inner radical leftist here, who knows.
 
JimR-OCDS said:
Trump himself called for his supporters to start attending Sander’s rallies and do to him what was done at Trump rallies.

Being the agitators were proven to be from moveon.org, when Sanders is out and the GE campaign starts, you can bet its gonna get more dirty than its been and Trump will have no problem with his supporters heckling Hillary.

Jim
Click to expand...
He didn’t call for his supporters to protest sanders. He threatened that. He said if sanders doesn’t stop maybe his supporters might do the same.

But his supporters will not do what the sanders people do. We have better things to attend to such as conversing with you guys over here.
 
JimR-OCDS said:
Planned Parenthood thinks all democrats are pro-choice and they don’t place Obama over anyone else, especially where Obama made an executive order when the ACA was passed, not to allow any funds to go for abortions.
Click to expand...
No, Cecile Richards (Planned Parenthood) was actually quoted as saying that Obama has done more for Women’s health services (abortion) than any other president.
The Illinois Born Alive Act was not only flawed in its language, but there were already laws in place prohibiting a doctor for not performing life saving procedures on a baby born alive.
Click to expand...
Yes, at the federal level, so I have to wonder at why he rejected the Illinois Born Alive Act?
The problem with the law, which all the medical groups opposed was, should a mother deliver a premature baby which dies during child birth, but it moves from a nerve twitch, and she thinks its alive, she could sue the doctor and he would be criminally charged until he could prove to a government board, that the infant was indeed dead at birth.
Click to expand...
The Illinois Born Alive Act was taken word for word if I’m not mistaken from its federal counterpart, so I hardly believe this argument is why Obama refused to legislate the “Born Alive Act”.
But this thread isn’t about Obama, he isn’t running for president.
Click to expand...
No, it’s not about Obama, but I can hardly credit comparing Obama to Trump what with the actual evidence of his political/moral misdeeds prior to his first presidential campaign.

p.s. There was enough (actual) evidence for all Catholics to disavow Obama right from the get go (his association with Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Jeremy Wright, his extreme pro-abortion stance. . . ).
 
queenofheartscv said:
He didn’t call for his supporters to protest sanders. He threatened that. He said if sanders doesn’t stop maybe his supporters might do the same.

But his supporters will not do what the sanders people do. We have better things to attend to such as conversing with you guys over here.
Click to expand...
This is more or less how the mob operates. 😉
 
Seamus_L said:
Police need to start arresting and bringing charges against these anti-Trump protesters who are using violence and intimidation tactics. The numbers arrested in Chicago were ridiculously low.
Click to expand...
In Chicago, they were given orders to arrest no one. Even the few who were arrested on valid charges were immediately released.

This whole protest Trump push is supported by the Dem establishment, to crush opposition.
 
Theo520 said:
In Chicago, they were given orders to arrest no one. Even the few who were arrested on valid charges were immediately released.

This whole protest Trump push is supported by the Dem establishment, to crush opposition.
Click to expand...
To crush opposition to what? There is nothing wrong with protesting as long as protesters aren’t violent.
 
The protesters are shutting down free speech, this is something entirely differently, Sheriff Joe, thankfully has made some arrests.

Whenever men or women of peace come, Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, Martin Luther King, Abe Lincoln, Ghandi, unfortunately, you see this kind of mob violence against such individuals.
 
FollowChrist34 said:
This is more or less how the mob operates. 😉
Click to expand...
There is no trump mob, is there? Trump wants the Sanders people to stop, that’s all. If they don’t, they don’t. If they break the law, they should be arrested, that’s all.

Does trump not have right to free speech?
 
Theo520 said:
In Chicago, they were given orders to arrest no one. Even the few who were arrested on valid charges were immediately released.

This whole protest Trump push is supported by the Dem establishment, to crush opposition.
Click to expand...
The Democrats got MItt Romney to come out against Trump?
 
FollowChrist34 said:
How does Megyn Kelly figure into this narrative? She is viciously attacking him, correct? Weakening him?
Click to expand...
Megyn Kelly has been unfair to Trump from the very beginning. She has also helped the trump momentum, IMO. Many people have dropped fox on account of her.

Granted, Megyn Kelly has also weakened trump’s reputation among some especially women, but given the political climate I don’t think those people will like trump anyway even without Kelly’s efforts.

It cuts both ways with Megan Kelly, mainly because her unfair treatment of trump is much more subtle than other vicious attacks Trump has had to endure.
 
Lily_Bernans said:
The Democrats like it, too, since they’d rather run against Trump.
Click to expand...
I’ll believe this when democrats start protesting Cruz and Kasich. If Trump is that easy to beat they wouldn’t bother showing up at this rally to shut it down.
 
Here’s something interesting:
Republican leaders adamantly opposed to Donald J. Trump’s candidacy are preparing a 100-day campaign to deny him the presidential nomination, starting with an aggressive battle in Wisconsin’s April 5 primary and extending into the summer, with a delegate-by-delegate lobbying effort that would cast Mr. Trump as a calamitous choice for the general election.
Click to expand...
Recognizing that Mr. Trump has seized a formidable advantage in the race, they say that an effort to block him would rely on an array of desperation measures, the political equivalent of guerrilla fighting.
Click to expand...
There is no longer room for error or delay, the anti-Trump forces say, and without a flawlessly executed plan of attack, he could well become unstoppable.
Click to expand...
But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative to Mr. Trump’s hard-edged populism. They described their plans in interviews after Mr. Trump’s victories last Tuesday in Florida and three other states.
Click to expand...
nytimes.com/2016/03/20/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-party.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

I don’t know if the Republican establishment will have time to get an alternative independent candidate on the ballot in all the states and having such a candidate would divide the Republican party even more than it already is and ensure a win for Hillary Clinton.
 
Lily_Bernans said:
The Democrats like it, too, since they’d rather run against Trump.
Click to expand...
Actually, they are fighting Trump now because they would much rather run against Cruz. Cruz is much more conservative and set on his ways to the point that he will alienate the middle class. Even though the polls show him polling better on a head to head with Clinton does now, the voting public really doesn’t know Cruz or his views. Once known, people in the middle aren’t going to agree with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top