Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Theo520 said:
LOL, mussolini didn’t create that quote.
Such juvenile pranks by the left show a lack of substance.
Click to expand...
He retweeted the quote from a Twitter account called “@ilduce2016” – and apparently thought nothing of that username. There’s something juvenile here alright.
 
Theo520 said:
LOL, mussolini didn’t create that quote.
Such juvenile pranks by the left show a lack of substance.
Click to expand...
It’s not a “prank” from right or left. It’s a parody account. There are many of them on Twitter.
 

Fox says Trump has ‘sick obsession’ with Megyn Kelly]

WASHINGTON — Fox News accused Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump of having a “sick obsession” with anchorwoman Megyn Kelly after the billionaire blasted the journalist’s coverage of the GOP primaries and called for a boycott of her news show.

"Donald Trump’s vitriolic attacks against Megyn Kelly and his extreme, sick obsession with her is beneath the dignity of a presidential candidate who wants to occupy the highest office in the land," Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti said in a blistering statement Friday night.

The chickens come home to roost:D
 
Abynissa said:

Fox says Trump has ‘sick obsession’ with Megyn Kelly]

WASHINGTON — Fox News accused Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump of having a “sick obsession” with anchorwoman Megyn Kelly after the billionaire blasted the journalist’s coverage of the GOP primaries and called for a boycott of her news show.

"Donald Trump’s vitriolic attacks against Megyn Kelly and his extreme, sick obsession with her is beneath the dignity of a presidential candidate who wants to occupy the highest office in the land," Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti said in a blistering statement Friday night.

The chickens come home to roost:D
Click to expand...
However, if Trump should become our nation’s President, I hope the American public is willing to give him the chance to prove his competence and ability rather than condemn him in advance due to any of his past behavior. The same goes for Clinton.
 
Why do people get so angry about protesters being disruptive? There have been accusations in this thread that they’re violating Trump’s First Amendment rights and stuff, but the point of a protest is to be disruptive.
 
Path_Finder said:
Charles Evers endorsed Trump, Evers is the brother of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, Ben Carson endorsed Trump as well.
Click to expand...
I think that brings the total number of blacks supporting Trump to 6, if you count Omarosa!!!
Good job!!!

👍
 
mary_bobo said:
I think sometimes people throw out names like totalitarian, Hitler, Nazi, etc. because it sounds cool. Many of them could not give you a definition is asked to do so.
Click to expand...
I think you are right, in part; though I am one who sees fascist echoes in Mr. Trump. And, yes, I could give you more than you want on any of these topics, which is probably why I see the similarities to those of notoriety.

#1. Mr. Trump is an opportunist, whose program is fluid, shifting to stoke the fires of an angry populace. *if one reads the early writings of dictators, it’s not so much “true believer” but “opportunism” that gets the job done for them. They use what works. It’s about Power, not Dogma.

#2. The use of nationalist sentiment or fear of a failing national economy to assume power.

#3. #1 & # 2 are Accompanied by scapegoating of minorities or religious/ethnic groups, complete with an idea to specially identify or deport.

#4. He is manipulative. What else is it when a person says they are prolife then defines it with a basic pro CHOICE definition? Manipulation of persons and facts. Liar.
 
Tablefor9 said:
I think you are right, in part; though I am one who sees fascist echoes in Mr. Trump. And, yes, I could give you more than you want on any of these topics, which is probably why I see the similarities to those of notoriety.

#1. Mr. Trump is an opportunist, whose program is fluid, shifting to stoke the fires of an angry populace. *if one reads the early writings of dictators, it’s not so much “true believer” but “opportunism” that gets the job done for them. They use what works. It’s about Power, not Dogma.

#2. The use of nationalist sentiment or fear of a failing national economy to assume power.

#3. #1 & # 2 are Accompanied by scapegoating of minorities or religious/ethnic groups, complete with an idea to specially identify or deport.

#4. He is manipulative. What else is it when a person says they are prolife then defines it with a basic pro CHOICE definition? Manipulation of persons and facts. Liar.
Click to expand...
Although I personally don’t view Trump as being in the same camp as fascists such as Hitler or totalitarians such as Stalin, you certainly make some good points. If anything, Trump seems to be taking a page or two out of their playbook with respect to the techniques he uses to rise to power. But Trump the man, as opposed to the politician, is no fascist. After all, he is a New Yorker and therefore must be at heart a good, decent person!
 
Regular_Atheist said:
Why do people get so angry about protesters being disruptive? There have been accusations in this thread that they’re violating Trump’s First Amendment rights and stuff, but the point of a protest is to be disruptive.
Click to expand...
Why did Hillary blame Trump for the protesting?

Since when is blaming the victim okay?
 
Bernie Sanders supporters were in the forefront of disrupting Trump’s planned rally in Chicago and have been involved in other protests that have gotten out of hand. The evidence is more than overwhelming. And the 1st Amendment does not protect one’s right of free speech at a venue that a candidate has rented for a rally. Might as well claim it protects disrupting mass in a Catholic Church.
 
Seamus_L said:
Bernie Sanders supporters were in the forefront of disrupting Trump’s planned rally in Chicago and have been involved in other protests that have gotten out of hand. The evidence is more than overwhelming. And the 1st Amendment does not protect one’s right of free speech at a venue that a candidate has rented for a rally. Might as well claim it protects disrupting mass in a Catholic Church.
Click to expand...
With regard to First Amendment rights, is what you say entirely correct? Doesn’t the First Amendment cover the right of peaceful protest OUTSIDE a rally, which is what I think most of the Sanders’ protesters were doing? Trump claims there was rioting by the protesters, but was that the case?
 
Regular_Atheist said:
Why do people get so angry about protesters being disruptive? There have been accusations in this thread that they’re violating Trump’s First Amendment rights and stuff, but the point of a protest is to be disruptive.
Click to expand...
I agree…what I would also like to know is why do some people think that the first ammendment only contains the right to free speech…there are several clauses in the first ammendment besides the right to free speech, including the right to assembly. These protesters do have the right to protest against Trump, it’s in the first ammendment.
 
meltzerboy said:
However, if Trump should become our nation’s President, I hope the American public is willing to give him the chance to prove his competence and ability rather than condemn him in advance due to any of his past behavior. The same goes for Clinton.
Click to expand...
And Cruz?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top