Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Bay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Luigi_Daniele said:
A better solution would be to allow them to be sued for liable
Click to expand...
“When people are chosen by a man to go into government at high levels and then they leave government and they write a book about a man and say a lot of things that were really guarded and personal, I don’t like that,” Trump said.
Click to expand...
But you can’t be sued for libel for writing something that’s true only something that’s false.

The definition of libel in Merriam-Webster:
Libel: the act of publishing a false statement that causes people to have a bad opinion of someone
Click to expand...
 
Thorolfr said:
But you can’t be sued for libel for writing something that’s true only something that’s false.

The definition of libel in Merriam-Webster:
Click to expand...
You really think the other poster doesn’t know what libel means?
 
Thorolfr said:
But you can’t be sued for libel for writing something that’s true only something that’s false.

The definition of libel in Merriam-Webster:
Click to expand...
Good point. Although many of these books are hokum
 
Luigi_Daniele said:
An interesting response might be “An innocent baby is murdered-what would you call it?”
Click to expand...
Since you said murdered, it must be murder. Anyone who participated in that murder should be punished. And please, don’t tell me the women involved are just stupid dupes who had no idea of what they were doing. I personally am tired of hearing how women are too stupid to know what they are doing. Trust me, they know.
 
queenofheartscv said:
You really think the other poster doesn’t know what libel means?
Click to expand...
Apparently they didn’t. Trump said that he didn’t like it when people write “a book about a man and say a lot of things that were really guarded and personal” to which the other poster said that Trump could sue them for libel. So I was just pointing out that you can’t sue someone for libel just for writing about “things that were guarded and personal”. You can only sue someone for libel if what they write about you is false.
 
Jeanne_S said:
Hillary at a rally just the other day,once again reiterated her devotion to abortion,when saying"We need a leader who is passionate about abortion"…yep she’s your gal if you are about “choice”😦
Click to expand...
If you passionately want abortion on demand to be legal, vote for Hillary. She also said that America needs war. NATO needs to be rethought, as Trump suggested, because today the threat is terrorism.
 
Tomdstone said:
If you passionately want abortion on demand to be legal, vote for Hillary. She also said that America needs war. NATO needs to be rethought, as Trump suggested, because today the threat is terrorism.
Click to expand...
Abortion has always been available on demand. It used to be called D&C. If you had enough money, you could have a safe abortion. Anyone who thinks it didn’t exist before Roe V. Wade has no clue as to what women have been doing for millennium.
 
sallybutler said:
Since you said murdered, it must be murder. Anyone who participated in that murder should be punished. And please, don’t tell me the women involved are just stupid dupes who had no idea of what they were doing. I personally am tired of hearing how women are too stupid to know what they are doing. Trust me, they know.
Click to expand...
I guess if people are going to call it murder but then are unwilling to punish the woman for participation in a murder (Trump of course was for a brief time though), they have to come up with some reason or justification. The woman being coerced or not knowing what she was doing seems to be their reason. 🤷
 
Peter_J said:
I honestly wasn’t going to tell you that.
Click to expand...
Thank you. I am so tired of this idea that women are somehow misguided or a victim of society’s view of their right to whatever. We are not stupid. If we have an abortion, we know what we are doing. Perhaps that is why the woman is excommunicated. The Church realises SHE is committing the sin, the doctor is only assisting.
 
queenofheartscv said:
I’ll speak as a female trump supporter. Women like to be safe; we like strength, confidence, humor, and leadership, all of which trump possesses.

If you insist trump doesn’t like women and vice versa, how come no one is saying hillary doesn’t like men and men don’t like hillary? The media always pushes the meme that republicans wage a war on women, and people just keep falling for it.
Click to expand...
I know you are a female Trump supporter.
Doesn’t change the fact that Trump is a misogynist that appeals to no significant female demographic. One female does not a demographic make.

He has mad a mockery of marriage.

We all know what the tripe that the MSM pushes when itshilling about racism and sexism.

But even a broken clock is right twice a day, not that it matters when it comes to being right about Trump. In his case, there is no need to invent the meme.

He is the meme.
 
Darryl1958 said:
I know you are a female Trump supporter.
Doesn’t change the fact that Trump is a misogynist that appeals to no significant female demographic. One female does not a demographic make.

He has mad a mockery of marriage.

We all know what the tripe that the MSM pushes when itshilling about racism and sexism.

But even a broken clock is right twice a day, not that it matters when it comes to being right about Trump. In his case, there is no need to invent the meme.

He is the meme.
Click to expand...
Do you have a vote in US elections? 🙂
 
Darryl1958 said:
I know you are a female Trump supporter.
Doesn’t change the fact that Trump is a misogynist that appeals to no significant female demographic. One female does not a demographic make.

He has mad a mockery of marriage.

We all know what the tripe that the MSM pushes when itshilling about racism and sexism.

But even a broken clock is right twice a day, not that it matters when it comes to being right about Trump. In his case, there is no need to invent the meme.

He is the meme.
Click to expand...
Only 70% of women view Trump unfavorably. And I saw a poll this wk showing 60% of women would vote for Clinton and only 31% for Trump. Either way sizable numbers of females oppose Trump no doubt about it. And if his negatives remain that high, I see no way Trump can win the Presidency. Add in 80% of Hispanics who view him unfavorably and it only gets worse for him.
 
Sy_Noe said:
Only 70% of women view Trump unfavorably. And I saw a poll this wk showing 60% of women would vote for Clinton and only 31% for Trump. Either way sizable numbers of females oppose Trump no doubt about it. And if his negatives remain that high, I see no way Trump can win the Presidency. Add in 80% of Hispanics who view him unfavorably and it only gets worse for him.
Click to expand...
What if at least 70% of men don’t like hillary? Wouldn’t that make it even?
 
It seems this discussion is being treated as though the primaries are already over and it is just between the two frontrunners. (Forgive me if I’m just stating the obvious.)

#AlwaysClinton #AlwaysTrump
 
Peter_J said:
It seems this discussion is being treated as though the primaries are already over and it is just between the two frontrunners. (Forgive me if I’m just stating the obvious.)

#AlwaysClinton #AlwaysTrump
Click to expand...
Trump did not have a good week. It seems like before a lot of punches were thrown and he would avoid them. This week it seems like every swing that he received, connected and damaged him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top