He did such a lousy job because he had absolutely positively no experience whatsoever that would be helpful to being president of United States. He was elected solely because of the color of his skin. He was given the Nobel peace prize solely because of the color of his skin in fact one could make the case if not for the color of his skin he would be running boogie boards on Waikiki Beach
You are entitled to your opinion. However there are not many who share it. It still boils down to the fact that you don’t like the things he did. I suppose Obama was elected president of the Harvard Law Review because of the color of his skin too, eh?
I think that being the equivalent of the Secretary of the Navy and Secretary of Defense during WWI qualifies as proving himself. Trump has never served in a public capacity, ever, and has demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of most public policy questions. Before Churchill was ever considered for Prime Minister, he had given almost all of his life to the service of his country. So a pretty major difference. Comparing Trump to Churchill is more than laughable.
Replace the words “jobs” and “business” with the words “political access” and “foundation,” and you have a good case to be made for why HRC should not be president.
Whoa, Mamma! And I got infracted? This statement is very offensive.
Politicians and others can “serve their country” and do a poor job at it. Merely counting years of service does not make the case that the public servant has done a great or even passable job in serving the public.
Huh?
How many times do you need to be reminded of the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition?
You are conflating two different positions. One is the position that says I do not approve of the job Obama has been doing. And that percentage is, as you say, near 50%. The other position is the one I was responding to, which was:
And that is the position that I said was not shared by many. As you can see, one position is much more extreme than the other. 50% agreeing with the first position certainly does not mean than 50% agree with the second one.
I have in fact heard of him, I just didn’t expect you to mean a Canadian social democrat Bernie Sanders supporter. It isn’t that he supports Trump it is that he hates Clinton with a fiery passion and given what is most important to him it really isn’t surprising he hates her.Actually, I kind of like this guy:
tarekfatah.com
He is a journalist and talk show host (though not “mainstream”) AND he is Muslim.
He gives reasoned and thoughtful analysis on questions regarding Islam that the mainstream media simply ignores or dismisses.
And, hey, what do you know? He happens to endorse Trump over Clinton.
youtu.be/leXvvk7inw0
That certainly runs counter to your storyline, doesn’t it?
Why wasn’t he on your list of possible candidates, above?
I suppose you have never heard of him.
Let me guess…
Your first instinct after reading this will be to go out and dig up the dirt on Fatah to discredit and dismiss him, yes?
The extent to which you cannot resist that urge is the extent to which liberal progressivism has infected your brain AND the extent to which you operate according to the belief that rhetoric beats dialectic – fallacious thinking as in the naturalistic fallacy has more compelling force for you than reason and logical argumentation.
But, hey don’t let me stop you.
What did you find on Fatah?
Not my cup of tea
You are aware that across the entire country crime plummeted during his tenure, right?
Churchill was a fairly repugnant man, even his contemporaries found his attitudes exceptionally brutish and antediluvian with his desire to subjugate non-Aryans who to him were sub-human filth, put them in concentration camps, cleanse them, starve them, wanted to kill Gandhi, barely flinched at the horror that was Amritsar, etc. He was the lovely fellow who created the Israel-Palestine conflict and judging by his disdain for both Arabs and Jews may have desired them to kill each other for all time. By the way, he gave us the mess that is Iraq. The man had much in common with Hitler save he deferred to military advice.
But he was good at golf!
OK, so you are seriously going with the position that Winston Churchill did not serve his nation well, but Trump has? Unbelievable.
Not 78%.
What experience did Barak Hussein Obama have? A community organizer? Give me a break!
Eight years as a state senator, four years as a US senator. What public service experience did Trump have? Inheriting money from his dad? Give me a break!
I don’t think that is correct. He was not a state senator for 12 years.
Yes,it is beyond frightening what this man and his minions have done to Europe’s economy and now ours! Evil indeed!
