Even with vouchers, how many poor children would benefit and what happens to the others? Also, if a whole lot of poor children go to the schools of their choice with the benefit of vouchers, what happens to these schools, many of which are private schools which consist of children who have learned the basic skills? I’ll tell you: overcrowding, which results in less efficient teaching. As any teacher knows, the more children, the less individual attention each child gets. Another result: parents of children who are up to grade take their children out of the private schools and teachers leave as well. (BTW, most private school teachers are not licensed as they have not taken education courses.) The once high-ranked private schools now become similar to the public schools which the poor children left. The solution: repair the public schools by firing incompetent teachers despite the protests of some of the teachers’ unions, hire excellent, well-trained and experienced teachers and pay them accordingly, reduce class size, improve and enrich the curriculum, and increase and allocate funding to ensure that all public schools are equipped with the latest technology available.
This sounds good, but one wonders about the degree to which it’s actually achievable. If vouchers were available, I think private schools would spring up like mushrooms after an April rain. Some would be good and some wouldn’t, but I think the latter would get weeded out in fairly short order.
I think many of us know what it would take to restore public education. But I don’t see it getting done. Too much political correctness, official propaganda, school politics, union control of school boards, etc, etc, etc. Personally, at present I think they’re hopeless for the most part.
For myself, I don’t think technology is the answer. Kids can learn quite well without it, and the performance of many private schools and home schools demonstrate it. Better to have teachers with real authority, basic but demanding curriculum and honest grading. For that, you need a bunch of rooms, blackboards, desks and talented, motivated teachers.
As improbable as it might seem to most people nowadays, kids who went to elementary school in one-room schoolhouses with one teacher actually managed to learn pretty well. I went to high school with a lot of them. I, myself, attended a Catholic grade school in which three classes were in one room with one sister teaching each class in turns. But both the Catholic schools of the era and the one-room public schools had serious discipline, parental support (not participation) a fairly advanced level of the basics and real grading.
Yes, yes, I know. What about special education? Strange as it may seem, the teachers simply worked (hard) with those who had learning problems, kept them back in part or in whole if needed. For the advanced, a student could always borrow books from someone a grade or more ahead, and some did.
We, and the one-room country schoolers absolutely had to behave and do exactly as we were told. One odd thing. We were required to use fountain pens for all homework, and it had to be the final product. No pencil, no erasures, no cross-outs, nothing. We couldn’t even use ball points. It could be a pain, but it eventually taught one to be careful, and right the first time, the alternative being to do it once however one wanted, then make a perfect copy of the outcome.
Pointless in a way, that fountain pen business, but it really did encourage self-discipline and seriousness in what one did.