Trump Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vouthon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, okay, we’ll take it on your word, then.

Perhaps, it is a myth is that they have NO desire to become self-sufficient, but do they have sufficient desire to become self-sufficient?

That question would be answered, to some extent, at least, by how many receiving the dole actually become habitual recipients. Got stats?
Those stats, if they existed, would not answer the question. There can be many factors for someone not becoming self-sufficient. Motivation is just one of them.
 
I am claiming the following
  1. just because you do not agree with the reasons for someone else’s fears does not mean they aren’t well-reasoned and based on historical facts. Where did I claim that fears necessarily caused paralysis? That seems to be a new subject.
  2. I said, I thought rather clearly, that fear already drives public policy. I did not mean to make a value judgement on that fact, I was just pointing out a fact.
  3. An opinion is a fancy word for feeling. Every one that posts about this theoretical wall that has no blueprints, no design, is voicing an opinion (feeling) about something that hasn’t even gotten on the drawing board much less off it. If we could not voice our opinions (feelings) on various topics unless they met strict standards, these forums would be barren.
That being said, a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border would not necessarily keep out illegal immigrants. Remember the 9/11 thugs came in thru Canada. The female thug in San Bernardino came in on an airplane, probably in LA or NY.

What about the Florida coast? How are you going to keep people from taking a plane to Canada and hiking taking the road migrants used to work in Maine?

Next, you is going to put up the money initially? Or will building start before Mexico turns over the money?

Will someone be monitoring the wall for maintenance purposes? Will Mexico also be paying for that?

Will Mexico decide to patrol their side, arresting anyone they find?

Wil the wall be built exactly on the border or some feet back? If the latter, how will that space be treated?

Since none of these questions have answers, any thing any of us say is an opinion (feeling) about the viability and usefulness of a wall.
 
Even with vouchers, how many poor children would benefit and what happens to the others? Also, if a whole lot of poor children go to the schools of their choice with the benefit of vouchers, what happens to these schools, many of which are private schools consisting of children who have learned the basic skills? I’ll tell you: overcrowding, which results in less efficient teaching. As any teacher knows, the more children, the less individual attention each child gets. Another result: parents of children who are up to grade take their children out of the private schools and teachers leave as well. (BTW, most private school teachers are not licensed as they have not taken education courses.) The once high-ranked private schools now become similar to the public schools which the poor children left. The solution: repair the public schools by firing incompetent teachers despite the protests of some of the teachers’ unions, hire excellent, well-trained and experienced teachers and pay them accordingly, reduce class size, improve and enrich the curriculum, and increase and allocate funding to ensure that all public schools are equipped with the latest technology available.
Sounds good:thumbsup:
 
Even with vouchers, how many poor children would benefit and what happens to the others? Also, if a whole lot of poor children go to the schools of their choice with the benefit of vouchers, what happens to these schools, many of which are private schools which consist of children who have learned the basic skills? I’ll tell you: overcrowding, which results in less efficient teaching. As any teacher knows, the more children, the less individual attention each child gets. Another result: parents of children who are up to grade take their children out of the private schools and teachers leave as well. (BTW, most private school teachers are not licensed as they have not taken education courses.) The once high-ranked private schools now become similar to the public schools which the poor children left. The solution: repair the public schools by firing incompetent teachers despite the protests of some of the teachers’ unions, hire excellent, well-trained and experienced teachers and pay them accordingly, reduce class size, improve and enrich the curriculum, and increase and allocate funding to ensure that all public schools are equipped with the latest technology available.
This sounds good, but one wonders about the degree to which it’s actually achievable. If vouchers were available, I think private schools would spring up like mushrooms after an April rain. Some would be good and some wouldn’t, but I think the latter would get weeded out in fairly short order.

I think many of us know what it would take to restore public education. But I don’t see it getting done. Too much political correctness, official propaganda, school politics, union control of school boards, etc, etc, etc. Personally, at present I think they’re hopeless for the most part.

For myself, I don’t think technology is the answer. Kids can learn quite well without it, and the performance of many private schools and home schools demonstrate it. Better to have teachers with real authority, basic but demanding curriculum and honest grading. For that, you need a bunch of rooms, blackboards, desks and talented, motivated teachers.

As improbable as it might seem to most people nowadays, kids who went to elementary school in one-room schoolhouses with one teacher actually managed to learn pretty well. I went to high school with a lot of them. I, myself, attended a Catholic grade school in which three classes were in one room with one sister teaching each class in turns. But both the Catholic schools of the era and the one-room public schools had serious discipline, parental support (not participation) a fairly advanced level of the basics and real grading.

Yes, yes, I know. What about special education? Strange as it may seem, the teachers simply worked (hard) with those who had learning problems, kept them back in part or in whole if needed. For the advanced, a student could always borrow books from someone a grade or more ahead, and some did.

We, and the one-room country schoolers absolutely had to behave and do exactly as we were told. One odd thing. We were required to use fountain pens for all homework, and it had to be the final product. No pencil, no erasures, no cross-outs, nothing. We couldn’t even use ball points. It could be a pain, but it eventually taught one to be careful, and right the first time, the alternative being to do it once however one wanted, then make a perfect copy of the outcome.

Pointless in a way, that fountain pen business, but it really did encourage self-discipline and seriousness in what one did.
 
God of power and might, wisdom and justice,
through you authority is rightly administered,
laws are enacted, and judgment is decreed.
Assist with your spirit of counsel and fortitude
the President and other government leaders of these United
States.
May they always seek
the ways of righteousness, justice and mercy.
Grant that they may be enabled by your powerful protection
to lead our country with honesty and integrity.
We ask this through Christ our Lord.
Amen.
 
This sounds good, but one wonders about the degree to which it’s actually achievable. If vouchers were available, I think private schools would spring up like mushrooms after an April rain. Some would be good and some wouldn’t, but I think the latter would get weeded out in fairly short order.

I think many of us know what it would take to restore public education. But I don’t see it getting done. Too much political correctness, official propaganda, school politics, union control of school boards, etc, etc, etc. Personally, at present I think they’re hopeless for the most part.

For myself, I don’t think technology is the answer. Kids can learn quite well without it, and the performance of many private schools and home schools demonstrate it. Better to have teachers with real authority, basic but demanding curriculum and honest grading. For that, you need a bunch of rooms, blackboards, desks and talented, motivated teachers.

As improbable as it might seem to most people nowadays, kids who went to elementary school in one-room schoolhouses with one teacher actually managed to learn pretty well. I went to high school with a lot of them. I, myself, attended a Catholic grade school in which three classes were in one room with one sister teaching each class in turns. But both the Catholic schools of the era and the one-room public schools had serious discipline, parental support (not participation) a fairly advanced level of the basics and real grading.

Yes, yes, I know. What about special education? Strange as it may seem, the teachers simply worked (hard) with those who had learning problems, kept them back in part or in whole if needed. For the advanced, a student could always borrow books from someone a grade or more ahead, and some did.

We, and the one-room country schoolers absolutely had to behave and do exactly as we were told. One odd thing. We were required to use fountain pens for all homework, and it had to be the final product. No pencil, no erasures, no cross-outs, nothing. We couldn’t even use ball points. It could be a pain, but it eventually taught one to be careful, and right the first time, the alternative being to do it once however one wanted, then make a perfect copy of the outcome.

Pointless in a way, that fountain pen business, but it really did encourage self-discipline and seriousness in what one did.
The whole package of what I presented is probably not achievable; but maybe parts of it are.

As to your education (and mine), it’s a different world today, as I’m sure you realize. Kids are attuned to technology and can learn from it. Personally, I am of the old school (as you are, apparently) and believe in face-to-face instruction, which involves human communication and discussion, discipline and motivation. I am not a big proponent of technology in isolation from the human element. However, technology, particularly computers, is where we are in the world today, and children who can use technology to learn, which includes also self-instruction and practice, are better equipped to face the challenges of the global society we live in. The days of the fountain-pen are long gone (unfortunately, in my view), as are so many other things: physical books, records, craftsmanship, long attention span, knowledge of grammar and spelling, clean comedy, movies with real stories and not just special effects, violence, and sex, love of learning for its own sake, and on and on. The culture is different and kids are different; everything has changed. We can never go back.

I think this topic really deserves its own thread.
 
If this is even half - true, then the entire human race is doomed for the next 4 years.

Say goodbye to global security measures that have been in place since WWII and kept the peace.

Say hello to useless trade wars between the great powers, macho authoritarianism, the breakdown of the rule of law in the US…

The consequences of a Trump victory are too horrifying for my brain to cope with. It would make Brexit look like a drop in the ocean by comparison.

We live in very frightening and uncertain times.

Truly, I dislike Hillary and don’t want her in the White House but I am praying that Trump doesn’t get in. Novenas, the rosary, you name it. I’m praying harder than I’ve ever prayed about any single issue in my entire life.

I don’t positively desire a Clinton presidency bit I’m not going to lie: I do negatively speaking desire that Trump loses the White House by a landslide so as to make populist nativism of the kind he represents an extinct beast in American and world politics for the forseeable future.

If God does not heed the prayers of millions in regard to Trump then I must conclude that the Almighty is punishing us all, collectively, for our sins.
^^This. There is more to being pro-life than simply anti-abortion. Trump, I truly believe, will get us into WWIII. I believe he will cause more death, pain and suffering that Hillary ever would - not that I like her. But Trump is a bully without a bit of diplomacy and no impulse control. He could destroy life on a massive scale and leave a world no one would want to bring a child into.
 
^^This. There is more to being pro-life than simply anti-abortion. Trump, I truly believe, will get us into WWIII. I believe he will cause more death, pain and suffering that Hillary ever would - not that I like her. But Trump is a bully without a bit of diplomacy and no impulse control. He could destroy life on a massive scale and leave a world no one would want to bring a child into.
I agree with this. That is why I am considering the American Solidarity Party - pro-life from womb to tomb and in line with Catholic social teaching.
 
Do you people here think that Trump will do his part in stopping the LGBT agenda? What actions do you think he will take against their power? Will he help repeal marriage equality?
 
^^This. There is more to being pro-life than simply anti-abortion. Trump, I truly believe, will get us into WWIII. I believe he will cause more death, pain and suffering that Hillary ever would - not that I like her. But Trump is a bully without a bit of diplomacy and no impulse control. He could destroy life on a massive scale and leave a world no one would want to bring a child into.
Precisely. That many do not realize the danger of Trump boggles my mind. Yet a good number of top Republicans do, and dozens of them have endorsed Clinton:

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/30/heres-the-growing-list-of-big-name-republicans-supporting-hillary-clinton/
 
Catholic priests are child molesters
I assume, of course, that you aren’t actually asserting that but offering an example to compare with Trump’s statement. And I agree.

But you see my point, right? Like in your example, if I responded “JdV said ‘Every Catholic priest is a child molester’.” then that could actually help you since you could turn the conversation to “I didn’t say ‘every’. I’m being falsely accused.” etc.
 
Precisely. That many do not realize the danger of Trump boggles my mind. Yet a good number of top Republicans do, and dozens of them have endorsed Clinton:

washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/30/heres-the-growing-list-of-big-name-republicans-supporting-hillary-clinton/
Birds of a feather stick together.The reason these republicans are supporting HC instead of DT is because they are all career politicians.They would rather she take the presidency than to even fathom the thought of an interloper non politician taking office.It isn’t DT per se that they object to,it is more the fact that he isn’t one of them.They are chagrined and threatened by the mere possibility.All that tells me is what most of the disaffected republican voting base already knows.There really isn’t a lick of difference between the two parties anymore.
 
Trump, I truly believe, will get us into WWIII.
Really? Which nuclear power is he actively antagonizing and blaming for his security failures in an effort to restart the Cold War?
I believe he will cause more death, pain and suffering that Hillary ever would - not that I like her.
Exactly which of his policies will - without doubt - result in the deaths of over 1 million children per year?
But Trump is a bully without a bit of diplomacy and no impulse control.
Evidence that Mr. Trump is a bully? We have testimony from Secret Service officers who served in the Clinton White House v1.0 that Mrs. Clinton was quite the bully herself to the very people assigned to guard her life- to the point that serving on her detail was seen as a punishment. And let’s not forget Mr. Vince Foster, who it now seems was either “suicided” or subjected to such a thorough berating and demeaning at the hands of Mrs. Clinton that he took his own life.

Let’s add another excuse to the list: “Because I believe that the pro-life candidate is a mean person, it is therefore okay for me to vote for the virulently pro-abortion candidate”
 
Birds of a feather stick together.The reason these republicans are supporting HC instead of DT is because they are all career politicians.They would rather she take the presidency than to even fathom the thought of an interloper non politician taking office.It isn’t DT per se that they object to,it is more the fact that he isn’t one of them.They are chagrined and threatened by the mere possibility.All that tells me is what most of the disaffected republican voting base already knows.There really isn’t a lick of difference between the two parties anymore.
That’s one of the things that makes this election so different. Despite the party labels, it’s not Republican vs. Democrat. It’s Globalist vs. Nationalist. It’s Business-as-Usual vs. Fix-the-System. It’s not Clinton that Trump is running against - it’s George Soros. A man who funds “Black Lives Matter”. A man who crashes national economies to make a buck. A man who - though Jewish himself - actively helped Nazis round up Jews for the camps during WWII. And the influence that evil man has over our current government - including Mrs. Clinton - should make anyone’s blood run cold.
 
^^This. There is more to being pro-life than simply anti-abortion. Trump, I truly believe, will get us into WWIII. I believe he will cause more death, pain and suffering that Hillary ever would - not that I like her. But Trump is a bully without a bit of diplomacy and no impulse control. He could destroy life on a massive scale and leave a world no one would want to bring a child into.
Except it is Clinton who seems to be promoting the selling of arms and toxic chemicals to autocratic regimes with wanton abandon.

thefederalist.com/2016/08/23/was-the-clinton-foundation-behind-shady-middle-eastern-arms-deals/

Sometimes the really dangerous “bullies” aren’t the ones who go about being obvious about it.
 
Birds of a feather stick together.The reason these republicans are supporting HC instead of DT is because they are all career politicians.They would rather she take the presidency than to even fathom the thought of an interloper non politician taking office.It isn’t DT per se that they object to,it is more the fact that he isn’t one of them.
Do you have any evidence of this mindset among Republicans? Lacking strong evidence to the contrary, the most straightforward premise is that Republicans (and Democrats too) are primarily interested in furthering their own particular vision of US government. Anyone who is on the same page with them in that effort would be welcomed in their respective parties, regardless of whether they are in some nebulous “club”. There are too many instances in history of successful outsiders who were welcomed on the basis of their views. Ronald Regan, for example, was not shunned for being an outsider. The difference between Trump and Regan is that Regan held views that appealed to other Republican “insiders”. Some of Trump’s views do not.
 
I am claiming the following
  1. just because you do not agree with the reasons for someone else’s fears does not mean they aren’t well-reasoned and based on historical facts. Where did I claim that fears necessarily caused paralysis? That seems to be a new subject.
  2. I said, I thought rather clearly, that fear already drives public policy. I did not mean to make a value judgement on that fact, I was just pointing out a fact.
  3. An opinion is a fancy word for feeling. Every one that posts about this theoretical wall that has no blueprints, no design, is voicing an opinion (feeling) about something that hasn’t even gotten on the drawing board much less off it. If we could not voice our opinions (feelings) on various topics unless they met strict standards, these forums would be barren.
That being said, a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border would not necessarily keep out illegal immigrants. Remember the 9/11 thugs came in thru Canada. The female thug in San Bernardino came in on an airplane, probably in LA or NY.

What about the Florida coast? How are you going to keep people from taking a plane to Canada and hiking taking the road migrants used to work in Maine?

Next, you is going to put up the money initially? Or will building start before Mexico turns over the money?

Will someone be monitoring the wall for maintenance purposes? Will Mexico also be paying for that?

Will Mexico decide to patrol their side, arresting anyone they find?

Wil the wall be built exactly on the border or some feet back? If the latter, how will that space be treated?

Since none of these questions have answers, any thing any of us say is an opinion (feeling) about the viability and usefulness of a wall.
Congratulations on your unique and mind-numbing blend of kettle logic combined with proof by verbosity, topped by that intriguing hint of Nirvana fallacy to achieve the je ne sais quoi quality in your post that you were so obviously intending.

I think I am presently having the same frightening experience you had when confronted by the Berlin Wall.

Big, scary wall of words tumbling down on top of me… :eek:
 
That’s one of the things that makes this election so different. Despite the party labels, it’s not Republican vs. Democrat. It’s Globalist vs. Nationalist. It’s Business-as-Usual vs. Fix-the-System. It’s not Clinton that Trump is running against - it’s George Soros. A man who funds “Black Lives Matter”. A man who crashes national economies to make a buck. A man who - though Jewish himself - actively helped Nazis round up Jews for the camps during WWII. And the influence that evil man has over our current government - including Mrs. Clinton - should make anyone’s blood run cold.
Absolutely!:mad:
 
O God, we acknowledge You today as Lord,
Not only of individuals, but of nations and governments.
We thank You for the privilege of being able to organize ourselves politically and of knowing that political loyalty does not have to mean disloyalty to You.

We thank You for Your law, which our Founding Fathers acknowledged and recognized as higher than any human law. We thank You for the opportunity that this election year
puts before us, to exercise our solemn duty not only to vote,
But to influence countless others to vote, and to vote correctly.

Lord, we pray that Your people may be awakened. Let them realize that while politics is not their
salvation, their response to You requires that they be politically
active. Awaken Your people to know that they are not called to be
a sect fleeing the world but rather a community of faith renewing the world. Awaken them that the same hands lifted up to You in prayer are the hands that pull the lever in the voting booth;
That the same eyes that read Your Word are the eyes that read the names on the ballot, and that they do not cease to be Christians when they enter the voting booth. Awaken Your people to a commitment to justice,
To the dignity of each individual human life, to the dignity of all people and those immigrating as Jesus did. To the worker for a fair and just wage keeping in mind that manipulating bankruptcy laws often violates just wages to many workers. Let us look for governors who actively practice integrity and provide us with confidence in goals talked about during the elections.

Lord, we rejoice today
That we are citizens of Your kingdom.

May that make us all the more committed
To being faithful citizens on earth.

We ask this through Jesus Christ, our Lord.

Amen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top