Some people of EVERY group are of questionable character. The fact Trump singles out Mexican Hispanics is telling. True, he is referring to illegal immigrants but, especially if an individual happens to be Mexican American or Hispanic in general, I can understand why s/he might take offense at the remark.He said SOME were of questionable character. Not all.He was speaking the inconvenient truth.
A 6% reduction in the abortion rate is a LOT of people that would be alive as a result of overturning that decision.Abortion will not be ended at the federal level. There are estimates that abortion would be lowered by a mere 6 % if Roe v. Wade were overturned, because of all the state laws that would remain in place.
If one is pro-life, trying to influence the legal system is an utterly inefficient, dead-end way of improving things. We have to work on the root causes of abortion.
This of course has nothing to do with Trump being against the establishment, but with the very nature of Trump’s reckless and dangerous comments and behavior.And none of these lifetime Republican appointees, sorry, “servants”, ever said a bad word when terrible establishment candidates like McCain or Romney were put before us, and they were truly terrible candidates, but they would keep the status quo. They towed the line and were just as happy to have Obama president as either McCain or Romney. However now that an outsider like Trump is the candidate, they are full of themselves and talking trash.
The system is broken. The establishment is in full defense against Trump now. The will of the people is denied yet again, and the establishment roles on. The American people will rue the day when Clinton becomes president…
Sure it is. But it won’t solve the problem of abortion, even though it would make a difference.A 6% reduction in the abortion rate is a LOT of people that would be alive as a result of overturning that decision.
This is true,I suppose he could have included other groups entering via Mexico due to our porous borders as well.Some people of EVERY group are of questionable character. The fact Trump singles out Mexican Hispanics is telling. True, he is referring to illegal immigrants but, especially if an individual happens to be Mexican American or Hispanic in general, I can understand why s/he might take offense at the remark.
It’s not a nice thing to say, but some ethnic/cultural groups have much much higher incidences of violence than others. And have zero interest is reducing it.Some people of EVERY group are of questionable character. The fact Trump singles out Mexican Hispanics is telling. True, he is referring to illegal immigrants but, especially if an individual happens to be Mexican American or Hispanic in general, I can understand why s/he might take offense at the remark.
As he, himself, said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and people would still vote for him. He’s a national embarrassment. (and international)
Neither candidate is fit to hold the Presidency, and no Christian should attempt to say they are.The contortions that people go through to justify Trump’s statements that clearly show he is not fit to hold the most powerful position in the world amaze me.
Nah. He only embarrasses certain “types” of people. The same who might be embarrassed to be seen with someone who isn’t quite up to their standards. The same who could use a little embarrassment from time to time to remind them that they are human after all. You know, the ones who think more highly of the opinions of others and of virtue signaling than they do of the truth. The ones who have been bought and paid for by those dictating the opinions about what should and should not be considered “embarrassing.”As he, himself, said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and people would still vote for him. He’s a national embarrassment. (and international)
Just because I think Trump is a national embarrassment does not mean that I don’t think Hillary is one as well. Whatever happens to the republicans this election, the blame will fall squarely on themselves. They did this to themselves.Nah. He only embarrasses certain “types” of people. The same who might be embarrassed to be seen with someone who isn’t quite up to their standards. The same who could use a little embarrassment from time to time to remind them that they are human after all. You know, the ones who think more highly of the opinions of others and of virtue signaling than they do of the truth. The ones who have been bought and paid for by those dictating the opinions about what should and should not be considered “embarrassing.”
It is pretty clear that those who point to things like “national embarrassment” have no clue regarding what we ought to be embarrassed about since they remain unperturbed by all the shenanigans perpetrated by the Clintons and will vote for her to be their leader.
The Hillary quote seems like she was concerned about her husband being assassinated, like Bobby Kennedy.I saw the clip of what Donald Trump said and he should have been more careful with his words because what he said was easy to see in different ways.
Mark Halperin says in this clip, “if you want to have the moral authority to condemn what Trump said, I don’t think you can look what Joe Biden said and just dismiss it.”
Should Joe Biden Have Taken Heat for His 2008 Gun Joke?
bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2016-08-09/should-joe-biden-have-taken-heat-for-his-2008-gun-joke
Some comments by Hillary Clinton, which she said she regrets, are also being circulated:
“My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right?” she said. “We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.”
mobile.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/us/politics/24clinton.html?_r=0
Right before this he states that she wants to abolish the second amendment.“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”