Only after the non-negotiables are all checked with a yes.
It seems that many believe that putting (R) behind his name absolves him of pretty much anything.If Clinton is a murderer (as some here profess) for her support of abortion on demand, is Trump a murderer for his support of abortion in the case of rape, incest and health of the mother?
Although from my understanding, “non negotiables” is a term that came into the forefront through the works of this lay-run private internet business calling itself “Catholic Answers”, I do find it strange how this site counts 5 yet the Pope himself says he doesn’t count values on fingers and has never understood the expression 5 non negotiables.
You know what would be really funny? And I know it’s a serious topic, but please bear with me. Getting Trump into a situation where he could be presented with an on the spot “quiz” on the non-negotiables - no advisers, no one to prompt the correct responses! I would absolutely pay to see that!
I think he would merely spout off whatever came to his mind on the spur of the moment and then later would have to correct it or change it or later on say what he supposedly really meant in the first place. Maybe thru Twitter. That seems to be how he operates and it hasn’t hurt him yet. But we’ll have to see if he is still made of such teflon and everything just bounces off of him no matter what he says once the general election campaign begins in earnest after the conventions are over. The Republican primary isn’t necessarily the general election.
Like Hillary agreeing in April an aborted fetus is a unborn person?
And for sure neither is the Democratic highly contested primary. Bernie promised to fire Wasserman this morning from the crooked Hillary DNC I hear, and more protests are set up.
Since the U.S. doesn’t elect it’s president based on the popular vote, this depends on the state one lives in. Unless of course you think a lot of die-hard Republicans in some state, such *** Kansas, will not be voting for Trump. If this is true, perhaps we need to look at why they don’t want to vote for Trump.
As a Presbyterian and not a Catholic, Trump may not view these five issues as non-negotiables.
Thanks for proving the point. Everything sticks to Hillary Clinton. Yet everything bounces off of Donald Trump.
Elementary conversation really, the fact is CAF, EWTN and frankly every Catholic teaching has to be neglected for Hillary to remotely be offered as acceptable from a Catholic paradigm. She has a anti christian socialist platform. She in fact persecutes christians as does this party. The best I seen offered in 1000 posts is one misquoted Bishop.
His on the spot abortion answers are already scary enough.
Is there anything a candidate could support that would disqualify them from getting your vote regardless of their stance on other issues ?Thank you. It’s refreshing to see that you’re not a one-issue voter.
Oh my goodness, truer words were never spoken. His supporters have given Trump a permanent Get Out of Jail Free tattoo. It’s fascinating how wealth and celebrity and dazzle really do draw us to people.
We have the teachings of the bishops in Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship and you are going elsewhere. You somehow claim that Bishop Kicanas is misquoted even though every time there is a post on it, it contains a direct quote from the bishop.Elementary conversation really, the fact is CAF, EWTN and frankly every Catholic teaching has to be neglected for Hillary to remotely be offered as acceptable from a Catholic paradigm. She has a anti christian socialist platform. She in fact persecutes christians as does this party. The best I seen offered in 1000 posts is one misquoted Bishop.
I don’t see an argument nor point just speculation bad logic and bad opinion of church reading.
The democratic socialist party is diametrically opposed to Catholicism/Orthodoxy.
If the general election does turn out to be between Hillary and Trump, I believe the kitchen sink is next!
He is misquoted and I showed how and on this thread. There is no argument about it. I view all the teaching of the Church unlike the failed theory of one misquoted Bishop in a bad sola reading of what another thinks he is saying and wrongly I might add. Thats what personal interpretation is. And as I said while neglecting “all” other. Let alone CAF which you have to throw under the bus along with EWTN, and while ignoring the preponderance of evidence is some sola rendition reading of one Bishop.
The Democratic Party is not officially a socialist party. They just have a socialist candidate running for them.
Oh I contend it is as Bernie states and Hillary moves closer to Bernie and well lets be honest Debbie Wasserman of the DNC could not differentiate between the Democratic Party and the Socialist Party. Because there is none, so imo we would be talking semantics.
This is because the non-negotiables (as mentioned here) are based on the American political climate only. Other nations can and do have other non-negotiables. In some nations, the government is doing other horrific things.Although from my understanding, “non negotiables” is a term that came into the forefront through the works of this lay-run private internet business calling itself “Catholic Answers”, I do find it strange how this site counts 5 yet the Pope himself says he doesn’t count values on fingers and has never understood the expression 5 non negotiables.
catholicnewsagency.com/news/all-values-are-non-negotiable-pope-says-in-new-interview/