Trump v GOP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abynissa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently this case is in court from my understanding. We probably should wait for the court ruling before finding anyone guilty. They do things that way where you live or no?
 
Like I said, the law suit will decide.

For the sake of argument here, you can’t just go with one side. You have to listen to both sides. But eventually it’ll be up to the courts.

During the debate when Trump said the students gave a 98% rating, Megan Kelly inserted herself in the debate again, **saying psychologists assert victims can praise their perpetrator when duped enough—a very weak rebuttal if you ask me. **
 
Good I quoted your post to make you happy today too. So here you are talking about the T-word again. Its a new day and you’ll feel even happier today we all hope. 👍

So you often frequent Trump threads to feel better? Now thats a phenom perhaps which could be attributed to his happy happy happy followers. 😉
Thank you, GaryTaylor. I think this ^^ might be the most mature post I’ve seen on this thread. 🙂
 
Yeah so the students got so duped when after finishing the courses gave a 98% approval rating and then came around to sue. I don’t buy it. But again, the courts will decide.

I’d also say, Megan Kelly broke debate rules about being a moderator by inserting herself into the debate. She pulled a candy crowley.

The voters will decide.
 
The education lawsuits have escalated here as funding and grants and loans became approved through Obama after 2008. Many of the schools I don’t think were bad but the fact is people run up 15-30 bills and still find themselves unable to use the earned degree to sustain a career. I don’t know in depth issue with Trumps school, I do know most of the cases are in court .
 
No, the courts will decide on the case, but the voters will decide on Trump, cruz, megan kelly, etc.

It’s no secret that Fox News doesn’t like Trump.

Also bear in mind that news media will stop at nothing to dig dirt on Trump no matter how minuscule, and the other candidates such as Cruz have been hiding in the shadows for the most part.
 
No it’s showing hypocrisy from people who criticize a no-relation between Trump and KKK but ignore real racism when it’s found in somebody else.
What a smoke screen.

Its no more of a hypocrisy than trying to support or defend Trump while trying to denounce Obama.
 
Trump is not a racist.

Sikhs and Muslims hold Rally in DC in support of Trump.

thegatewaypundit.com/2016/03/sikhs-and-muslims-hold-dc-rally-for-donald-trump/

“When he talks about Muslims, he does not talk about all Muslims or American Muslims. He spoke in the context of the refugee crisis that was happening in Syria. We (Sikhs) agree with him. Muslim (Americans) agree with him that we should not bring people into this country before we can vet them. And this was a temporary measures proposed by him,” Singh said.
Yes, Trump was challenging Obama to fix the known gaps in our screening process.
 
What a smoke screen.

Its no more of a hypocrisy than trying to support or defend Trump while trying to denounce Obama.
I think my argument was actually well laid out. You can call it what you like but in fact I suggest they are both opportunistic politics. As far as insisting one is racist and the other isn’t. Oh yes, thats for sure hypocrisy. In fact a blatant double standard.

Now the smoke screen is Hillary and her systematic racism. She just sweeps and entire party over to the racist corner as in all Republicans, not just Donny boy. Democrats are not racist 😃
 
Hey, you have to denounce racism to join the Democratic party we can tell how well thats working by Black Lives Matter. 👍 While Hillary and Bernie scurry to kiss their rear ends. No one see’s any of that though. Completely explainable. No issue what-so-ever. None. 😊
 
Republicans are mostly liars, I’ll grant you that. I have never understood why so many conservative Catholics buy their empty promises year after year. But what reason do we have for believing Trump’s new found position on abortion now?

I doubt many of Trump’s supporters support him because they believe he is strongly pro-life. They should just admit that they are taking that issue of the table this cycle, because that is what is happening.
👍
 
I think my argument was actually well laid out. You can call it what you like but in fact I suggest they are both opportunistic politics. As far as insisting one is racist and the other isn’t. Oh yes, thats for sure hypocrisy. In fact a blatant double standard.

Now the smoke screen is Hillary and her systematic racism. She just sweeps and entire party over to the racist corner as in all Republicans, not just Donny boy. Democrats are not racist 😃
Well, if you belong to a party that allows…some one like Trump to be its front runner…I believe she has a valid reason to think it.
 
Hey, you have to denounce racism to join the Democratic party we can tell how well thats working by Black Lives Matter. 👍 While Hillary and Bernie scurry to kiss their rear ends. No one see’s any of that though. Completely explainable. No issue what-so-ever. None. 😊
So again, what are you suggesting, we fight racism with racism?
 
Yeah so the students got so duped when after finishing the courses gave a 98% approval rating and then came around to sue. I don’t buy it.
It’s actually very possible if the evaluations weren’t anonymous and were completed while participants’ success was still being measured. This is why in reputable institutions of higher education, student evaluations are anonymous and professors don’t receive results until well after final grades have been entered. Back when they were still being administered in the classroom via paper and pencil (as opposed to today, when evals are all done electronically), I wasn’t even supposed to be in the room when students completed them. Studies have shown that student evaluations are almost universally worthless in measuring classroom experiences – but conducting them as Trump “University” did takes the almost out of the equation entirely.
 
Well, if you belong to a party that allows…some one like Trump to be its front runner…I believe she has a valid reason to think it.
If you belong to a party that allows Hillary to run for president with all the lies and shenanigans she pulled, I see no reason why you should be listened to.
 
Its only Republicans who lie? You sure you want to go with that? Oh memories of Johnson still swim through my mind. 👍 50 years of nothing but lies by them.

Wait the Demos not only JUST amended their racist ways via Hillary but lying ways also. Hillary is the par excellence of liar. 😉
 
It’s actually very possible if the evaluations weren’t anonymous and were completed while participants’ success was still being measured. This is why in reputable institutions of higher education, student evaluations are anonymous and professors don’t receive results until well after final grades have been entered. Back when they were still being administered in the classroom via paper and pencil (as opposed to today, when evals are all done electronically), I wasn’t even supposed to be in the room when students completed them. Studies have shown that student evaluations are almost universally worthless in measuring classroom experiences – but conducting them as Trump “University” did takes the almost out of the equation entirely.
The courts will decide. I have no opinion one way or the other.

I do find it odd Megan Kelly would be debating Trump like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top