The majority of the electoral votes put him in office for 4 years. That’s how the system works. The voters get to remove him this fall if they choose to.
- Status
You’re right. Schiff isn’t crazy. He’s an elected representative who thought he had the power to overturn an election by lying.
Please. The NYT hired Sarah Jeong, best known for her racist tweets, and stood by her.
Dog whistle. lol. I don’t even use dog whistles on dogs.
I didn’t accuse you of racism. I pointed out that, when faced with no argument, you turned to race.
Last edited:
J
Jeanne_S
Guest
Good for you ,that doesn’t mean you are correct however.
M
Maximus1
Guest
It means I relied on Brietbarts top guy in assessing the weight and bias of the paper. They can actually be left wing trolls, and my placing confidence in Bannon, totally misplaced. But I think the odds of that small.
M
Maximus1
Guest
I saw something completely different.
If you are a Republican who saw something completely different, AUTOMATIC PARIAH STATUS. As fast as a lightning bolt and as thorough in destruction in revenge
If you are a Republican who saw something completely different, AUTOMATIC PARIAH STATUS. As fast as a lightning bolt and as thorough in destruction in revenge
Last edited:
You said white nationalist.
But that’s what you went to, off the topic. Not germane. What the Breitbart article wrote was not about race.
M
Maximus1
Guest
I wasn’t talking about race. I was talking about why I do not consider Breitbart reliable.
You mentioned race. There are lots of reasons I don’t consider the DNC media reliable, but when someone uses them as a reference, what I think of them doesn’t matter. What matters is the content.
CNN, MSNBC, WAPO, etc were all complicit in helping Schiff with his coup attempt. They even had some of the perpetrators on as “paid contributors “. But when someone references these scoundrels, I dispute their propaganda.
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
Well you can hope they are taken over by the state if Trump wins.
CNN-TASS MSNBC-PRAVDA.
Then the headline can thank world leaders for their help defeating the enemy of the people , Biden.
On to lock up our political enemies. Yea.
CNN-TASS MSNBC-PRAVDA.
Then the headline can thank world leaders for their help defeating the enemy of the people , Biden.
On to lock up our political enemies. Yea.
They’re already wholly owned subsidiaries of the DNC. Media taken over by the state is a progressive/authoritarian practice.
Again, locking up political opponents is a progressive/authoritarian practice.
M
Maximus1
Guest
A progressive/ authoritarian practice, Lock her up, was Trump’s winning slogan.
Did anyone in the GOP tell any constituent , one rally after the next, that lock her up was what you say?
After all, it became the SPONTANIOUS unifying chant at Trump rallys. Whoever spoke became the Conductor.
Generalissimo will now lead us in our Trumpitudes!
I still love," why do Democrats go negative on Trump when he leads the chant. It’s so charming! NOW THAT IS STATE TV. Not to be confused with the loyal opposition network ever. On loyal opposition they say goodbye to members of the resistance till the screen goes blank.
Did anyone in the GOP tell any constituent , one rally after the next, that lock her up was what you say?
After all, it became the SPONTANIOUS unifying chant at Trump rallys. Whoever spoke became the Conductor.
Generalissimo will now lead us in our Trumpitudes!
I still love," why do Democrats go negative on Trump when he leads the chant. It’s so charming! NOW THAT IS STATE TV. Not to be confused with the loyal opposition network ever. On loyal opposition they say goodbye to members of the resistance till the screen goes blank.
R
RidgeSprinter
Guest
Tucker is entitled to his opinion. After all he is nothing but a high paid “On the AIr” Blogger.
M
Maximus1
Guest
I think Tucker can boast Senior Shill status. After all his content has been integrated into the Leaders message for a while
Last edited:
R
RidgeSprinter
Guest
I thought that was a TRUMPonian practice. “LOCK HER UP” “LOCK HER UP” “LOCK HER UP”
That was a slogan. Schiff’s Attempted to use his position of power to overturn an election and remove a duly elected president, using lies and complicity in the intel community and media.
John Brennan and others called Trump a traitor, a capital offense. In other words, they were calling for his execution. That was far worse.
Franco was a fascist, another form of progressivism.
A slogan, not a practice. Trump has made no attempt to lock her up. Schiff, on the other hand, did everything he could to destroy our 2016 electIon and remove an elected president from office based on a series of lies and the complicity of the DNC media and members of the Obama intel communityJonNC:
I thought that was a TRUMPonian practice. “LOCK HER UP” “LOCK HER UP” “LOCK HER UP”
Last edited:
LeafByNiggle
Well-known member
What Adam Schiff did was totally legal and was within his rights according to the Constitution. Impeachment is one the enumerated powers of the Congress. (I know from the 2nd amendment discussions how much you like those things that are enumerated in the Constitution.) Speculating on his motivations is irrelevant. So saying things like “trying to overturn the election” is irrelevant. Of course he wished it were overturned. So does half the country. But that too is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is the law. Is he charged with a crime? No. Personally I think Fox should fire Tucker. But that too is irrelevant.
I didn’t know that manufacturing false charges and regularly lying about them in an attempt to unseat a duly elected president was one of his constitutional enumerated powers.
Yes, and just like the second amendment foes not give me the right to shoot someone without just cause, Schiff’s powers did not include collusion with people in the intel community whose intent it was to overturn and election and destroy an duly elected president.
No need to speculate anymore. The evidence/ proof is coming out day by day.
But he is the one who abused his power to try to do it without cause. Calling that irrelevant is stunning.
Fire him for telling the truth.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Fascism is right wing and nationalist.
Overturning election of a duly elected president is inaccurate. It is impeaching by Constitutional process. The only remedy available when the president opperates improperly.
You say using lies and complicity. Now you are mixing two different things.
Schiff impeached Trump with a Whistleblower whose report was corroborated. Every witness, under oath, coroborates the allegations.
Decorated war hero’s
Trump’s hand picked political appointees who gave Trump 1 million dollars.
Ambassadors distinguished for bipartisan service.
In short…nobody you mention. That’s who Schiff put on. The evidence proved every part of the case. Republicans like Rubio Alexander, and the Senator from Utah said the allegations were proven. THIS IS THE HISTORICAL RECORD TRUMP CANNOT ERASE. 2020 and a minority of Americans are a blip. Americans in history will judge
Overturning election of a duly elected president is inaccurate. It is impeaching by Constitutional process. The only remedy available when the president opperates improperly.
You say using lies and complicity. Now you are mixing two different things.
Schiff impeached Trump with a Whistleblower whose report was corroborated. Every witness, under oath, coroborates the allegations.
Decorated war hero’s
Trump’s hand picked political appointees who gave Trump 1 million dollars.
Ambassadors distinguished for bipartisan service.
In short…nobody you mention. That’s who Schiff put on. The evidence proved every part of the case. Republicans like Rubio Alexander, and the Senator from Utah said the allegations were proven. THIS IS THE HISTORICAL RECORD TRUMP CANNOT ERASE. 2020 and a minority of Americans are a blip. Americans in history will judge
- Status