Tucker: What does the US get from supporting WHO?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest
Last edited:
1cthlctrth . . .
“Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China,”
Click to expand...
It is misinformation for sure.

Even the Chinese doctors were warning the world about this (some of them disappeared).

It is only NOT “misinformation” if you play word games like this . . .
“Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no CLEAR evidence . . .
Click to expand...
1cthlctrth. I know YOU know this but there are lurkers here.

For them . . .

Don’t anyone be fooled by the semantics.

This is no time for such game playing by the WHO.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. I think it’s clear what any thinker would interpret the WHO was saying on January 14th.
(Just so you know, I’m more concerned about fair-minded readers than about contrarian commenters who will never say anything good about pro-life politicians.)
 
1cthlctrth . . .
(Just so you know, I’m more concerned about fair-minded readers than about contrarian commenters who will never say anything good about pro-life politicians.)
Click to expand...
Yes. Of course I know that.

And if there were not lurkers here that may have NEED of real information, I probably would ignore some more of the ridiculous comments.
 
Last edited:
1cthlctrth said:
I think it’s clear what any thinker would interpret the WHO was saying on January 14th.
Click to expand...
I agree that it is clear:

“Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China,
 
Yet we had Chinese physicians warning otherwise.
And the WHO opted to put out this disinformation (which virtually everyone here now knows, was a partial truth).
 
Last edited:
This business of WHO in the news reminded me of an interaction I had with them in 2009. Basically, they denied in an email to me that a particular committee at WHO validated the work of Dr. Linoli on the Eucharistic Miracle at Lanciano. However, they did not reply to a subsequent email asking if a different committee or staff member validated it. I later discovered a scan of an abstract report validating the science involved. That abstract was stamped with a WHO seal. Read the account in this old, old thread:
40.png
Examples of miracles Apologetics
As promised, I am getting back to you on this allegation. The Zenit story claims that a scientific commission by the WHO examined the earlier scientific work of Dr. Linoli. Dr. Linoli concluded that the tissue at Lanciano was not preserved by artificial means, lending credence to a “miracle” occurring. The article even says this commission conducted 500 tests the “extract” of which was published in 1976 in New York and Geneva. If this was a fabrication, it was a peculiar one. How easily co…
Click to expand...
 
Dr. Michael Osterholm, a Minnesota-based epidemiologist who coauthored the 2017 book Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs, disagrees with President Trump’s decision to withhold funds from the World Health Organization.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top