There were a few things that were pulled.
- Dissenter Plugin
- iOS Gab App
- Gab Android App
- Azure Hosting
- GoDaddy Registration
- Card processing accounts
Dissenter, Gab’s browser plugin for commenting on sites with no concerns for the site’s speech limitations. The comments would only be visible to people that had the plugin. t was removed from the FireFox add-on site and the Chrome Web Store. Businesses tend not to be fans of what people collectively call “hate speech” and wanted nothing to do with it.
They’ve experienced getting kicked out a lot. The Gab app was removed from the Google Android App store and the Apple App store. Though for Android someone could still load the application outside of the app store. I
On Gab pretty much anything went. They quickly became a favourite network for alt-right leaning people. I think the frog logo they used contributed to that, as it may invoke thoughts of Pepe the frog, another alt-right icon.
(
Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
They were hosted in Microsoft Azure. But someone complained about antisemitic posts to Microsoft. And that’s against Microsoft’s terms of service. So Gab had to finally make an act of censorship.
Another setback was the Christchurch shooting. The shooter had been having a discussion on his feelings on Gab and they got associated with it. After that, there were a lot of groups that wanted to disassociate with Gab. They got kicked off of Microsoft and Godaddy. They had to come up with new software for their service and settled on something based on the Mastodon software (the Mastodon community then tried to distance themselves from Gab) and they found a hosting company outside the USA that was willing to host them. Visa refuses to do business with Gab (which also means that banks that use Visa’s network won’t do business with them). For the “premium” level services that they offer one must pay with paper cheque since they haven’t found card processor that will do business with them.
I don’t know if Parler has learned from the mistakes of Gab, but they have some things in their ToS to keep the possibility of censorship opened. The condition that a user be responsible for any legal costs that come from that user’s post also has me wondering if they are anticipating Section 230 protections disappearing. They have suspended a few accounts.
Ex: “Devin Nunes’ cow

” was removed.
Parler is still kept afloat from investment money. I’ve no idea what their longer-term revenue plan will be. It’ll be interesting to see how they unfold. Once money from other parties gets involved constraints can come with it. That’s why some of the monetization restrictions exists on YouTube; those that write the cheques demanded change from Google.