Two women accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
earthbound said:
Ah yes, personal attacks.
Perfectly acceptable for this site, as long as you are working within the agenda.
Click to expand...
I was referring to myself…start getting a twitch in my left eye about this time of night.
 
seekerz said:
Well the suggestion that Coulter’s blogger status might excuse the inexcusable or that her statements equate to anything recently said by a politician of either stripe, was a bit much for me to let slide.
Click to expand...
The more outrageous Coulter is, the more the right defends her. Am I crazy or does she have an adam’s apple?
 
earthbound said:
Ah yes, personal attacks.
Perfectly acceptable for this site, as long as you are working within the agenda.
Click to expand...
Are you referring to the personal attacks someone wrote in post # 369? Those personal attacks?

Ishii
 
ishii said:
Are you referring to the personal attacks someone wrote in post # 369? Those personal attacks?

Ishii
Click to expand...
I don’t think so Ishi. I thing she’s referring to the reference of taking her meds which was retracted with a wink and a nod. Ahhhh…the wink and nod…the smiley face…the shrug…the eye roll…they do so much in taking the edge off an obvious insult. (wink, wink)
 
Pirate_Talker said:
Are you basing you comments on Gilliam’s previous post or are you quoting another poster. As of this evening one woman was paid 35K and another was paid 45K. That is not chump change in my opinion.
Cain’s campaign manager is blaming Perry. Perry is blaming Romney. Somehow, Rahm Emmanual has also been accused. This story has more twists and turn than…(fill in the blank.
Now Mrs Cain is no longer going on Fox on Friday.
Hard to keep up without plotting out a time line.
Click to expand...
The more time goes by and more and more information is released, the more things smell.
 
Marie5890 said:
The more time goes by and more and more information is released, the more things smell.
Click to expand...
I was a bit worried about this as well until I heard Cain talk about it to Sean Hannity. I don’t think he ever did anything at all.
 
earthbound said:
Cain gets more free publicity from the bankster media…
Just like McCain got a few years ago. Same old script.
These banksters really do consider us stupid.

Meanwhile the media ignores his utter failure at creating jobs. He is a proven job killer, not to mention his other documented legal indiscretions.
Of course the media is harping on his infidelity.

They want us all to consider infidelity normal, or even a positive.
Faux news is not your friend. Glenn beck is not your friend. They want your children to die in war.

Something I find quite surprising is the audacity of so-called “Catholic” persona’s who are willing to ignore Cain’s blatant refusal to put his Pro Life commitment into writing.
Only he and Romney refused to sign it. That says a lot.

Also surprising is his plans on taxing the poor to fund more foreign war.
Amazing how these persona’s who are portrayed as “Catholic” all uniformly support war mongering with the same catch phrases and empty “points” we have already heard on faux news. Almost as if they are incapable of humane thought.

This thread is pure sockpuppet propaganda theater.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
 
News organizations continue to protect identities of Cain’s accusers - Daily Caller
Cain camp says it’s raised more than $1 million since Sunday night - MSNBC
 
Define Sexual Harassment

Herman Cain is no longer talking about the economy, the national debt, or his 9-9-9 tax plan. Instead, he’s been put on the defensive over a couple of accusations that he behaved inappropriately with women while he was CEO of the National Restaurant Association. According to Cain, one allegation involves his remarking to a woman that she was the same height as his wife. He said he used a hand gesture to indicate where she “came up to” near his chin. Inasmuch as “hand gestures” are part of the alleged complaint, if that is the gesture alluded to, it’s hardly grounds for such a devastating accusation.

That brings up the question: what exactly constitutes sexual harassment? Cain mentioned in an interview that he may have occasionally complimented a woman on the way her hair looked, or some other innocuous observations. Isn’t that what men have been doing since the dawn of time? When did it become obnoxious to recognize and comment on a woman’s looks?

Read more: americanthinker.com/2011/11/define_sexual_harassment.html#ixzz1cjYIq3pH
 
it’s not the weakness of the evidence; it’s the seriousness of the accusation.

[where have we heard that before?]

not to mention the blue dress.

[what was the accusation again?]

tell us about the $45,000 again?
 
Raskolnikov said:
Well that settles that. If Ann Coulter thinks it, it’s almost certainly false.
Code: 
 Guys like you like to make a sarcastic point, and then ignore serious questions which challenge one's own rigid POV. Again, why were horrific RAPE charges against Bill Clinton by NAMED sources ignored? They are Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. Wellstone made the charge to Oxford campus police way back in Clinton's college days, and there were hints that others may have charged him with sexual thuggery at this time. If anything, a REAL reporter not working for Pravda might have wanted to pursue an obvious pattern. 
 You might want to put your brain to work, Ras, and try to rationalize and justify why there was media silence at the time.  Cordially, Rob :cool:
Click to expand...
 
bbarrick8383 said:
I was a bit worried about this as well until I heard Cain talk about it to Sean Hannity. I don’t think he ever did anything at all.
Click to expand...
I am curious to know what he or Hannity could’ve said that could substitute for verifiable evidence?
40.png
RACJ:
Guys like you like to make a sarcastic point, and then ignore serious questions which challenge one’s own rigid POV. Again, why were horrific RAPE charges against Bill Clinton by NAMED sources ignored? They are Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. Wellstone made the charge to Oxford campus police way back in Clinton’s college days, and there were hints that others may have charged him with sexual thuggery at this time. If anything, a REAL reporter not working for Pravda might have wanted to pursue an obvious pattern.
You might want to put your brain to work, Ras, and try to rationalize and justify why there was media silence at the time. Cordially, Rob
Click to expand...
All of which has nothing to do with the fact that even if Cain turns out to belcompletely innocent, which may well be the case, Ann Coulter will still be a bigoted liar.
 
“The National Restaurant Association on Friday confirmed that it granted a financial settlement to a woman after she filed a sexual harassment complaint against Herman Cain in 1999. The trade group also freed her from her confidentiality agreement, although her attorney said she doesn’t intend to speak publicly on the matter.” – The Hill

The Herman Cain sexual harassment story has yet to catch fire on the campaign trail, as it has been ignored by his rivals for the GOP nomination. – Boston Globe

Poll shows that GOP voters in the early primary states have remained unfazed by Cain’s recent troubles. – Associated Press

“The scandal here is not that Republicans don’t care about sexual harassment allegations — which are still somewhat murky at this point — but that a guy as lightweight as Cain is running neck and neck with Romney,” Rod Dreher writes at The American Conservative.
 
_Abyssinia said:
“The National Restaurant Association on Friday confirmed that it granted a financial settlement to a woman after she filed a sexual harassment complaint against Herman Cain in 1999. The trade group also freed her from her confidentiality agreement, although her attorney said she doesn’t intend to speak publicly on the matter.” – The Hill

The Herman Cain sexual harassment story has yet to catch fire on the campaign trail, as it has been ignored by his rivals for the GOP nomination. – Boston Globe

Poll shows that GOP voters in the early primary states have remained unfazed by Cain’s recent troubles. – Associated Press

“The scandal here is not that Republicans don’t care about sexual harassment allegations — which are still somewhat murky at this point — but that a guy as lightweight as Cain is running neck and neck with Romney,” Rod Dreher writes at The American Conservative.
Click to expand...
Shows to go ya about how weak a candidate Romney actually is … Dukakis-lite … lacking only the Dark Helmet peeking out of the tank hatch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top