Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmachine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In addition to this being factually incorrect it’s telling that the defense is not “Trump is not the kind of person who would sexually assault a woman” but “the chair arms didn’t raise up!”
Right; the “aviation defense” is at best inconclusive.

According to this article, some planes did have adjustable armrests in first-class at the time:

yahoo.com/news/katrina-pierson-uses-curious-aviation-defense-against-trump-accusations-181414361.html

So the statement from the Trump person that it couldn’t have happened because the planes at the time didn’t have adjustable armrests in first class doesn’t 100% prove the story is false.
 
Is this turns out to be true, I Hope you have the dignity to apologize to he women, the Forums and distance yourself from Trump
Still waiting for an apology to Catholics, Southeners, Latinos, Goldstar moms for Benghazi. Lots of apologizing needs to be done before I get around to it!
 
Still waiting for an apology to Catholics, Southeners, Latinos, Goldstar moms for Benghazi. Lots of apologizing needs to be done before I get around to it!
Yes, Trump needs to apologize the Latinos, to Miss Universe, to the disabled.

You make a big deal of Benghazi, FDR knew that Pearl harbor was going to get hit, but let it happen so it could allow the US to go to WWII. No one complains.\

Bush knew aand had intel about an imminent attack. Yet, he stood pat and allowed 9/11. Those things killed human lives. Were is the crying about that?
 
Donald Trump is the source.
They don’t realize he said, that he could kiss them and touch their privates bc he’s a star. I mean the man basically incriminated himself, but they see it as the Clinton train doing this.
It was the Trump-o-mobile who actually caused this.
 
These women were selected and given stories. There is no evidence although there were witnesses. None of them have come forth. Nice try, but this reeks of desperation!
Okay, but ten of them?

From one of the earlier posts:

thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/12/all-of-donald-trump-s-accusers-a-timeline-of-every-alleged-grope-and-assault.html

Ten different allegations?

If it were one, I might say it could be a disgruntled employee or something.

But, since there were ten, I’d be inclined to think it’s part of a pattern, especially in view of his comments on the leaked tape last week and his other comments.
 
Okay, but ten of them?

From one of the earlier posts:

thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/12/all-of-donald-trump-s-accusers-a-timeline-of-every-alleged-grope-and-assault.html

Ten different allegations?

If it were one, I might say it could be a disgruntled employee or something.

But, since there were ten, I’d be inclined to think it’s part of a pattern, especially in view of his comments on the leaked tape last week and his other comments.
Plus, to say, it’s ok to call my daughter “a piece of a–” That’s just disrespectful and sick.
 
LOL Howard Stern is a top rate journalist. The King of All Media!!!
Give me break. The Apocalypse is soon now that Howad Stern is a legitimate source!
Good Grief!!!
It is an audio recording. An audio recording is a primary source of evidence . It isn’t a quote that Hoaward stern attributed to Trump.

Trumps own words describing behavior that he’s being accused of.
 
FDR knew that Pearl harbor was going to get hit, but let it happen so it could allow the US to go to WWII. No one complains.\

Bush knew aand had intel about an imminent attack. Yet, he stood pat and allowed 9/11. Those things killed human lives. Were is the crying about that?
Spouting factless and baseless conspiracy theories like this is libelous. It will also cause others to ignore any salient or factual argument you might try to make.
 
Spouting factless and baseless conspiracy theories like this is libelous. It will also cause others to ignore any salient or factual argument you might try to make.
I fully agree with you!
 
Spouting factless and baseless conspiracy theories like this is libelous. It will also cause others to ignore any salient or factual argument you might try to make.
Here’s some info about that. I recommend you reading about history.

usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/29/declassified-memo-hinted-of-1941-hawaii-attack-

nytimes.com/2004/04/18/weekinreview/the-world-early-warnings-what-did-he-know-and-when.html

thenewamerican.com/culture/history/item/4740-pearl-harbor-hawaii-was-surprised-fdr-was-not
 
“Lie down with dogs, wake up to your nominee being wiped out in the electoral college” is what my dear old Dutch Uncle used to tell me.
 
Plus, to say, it’s ok to call my daughter “a piece of a–” That’s just disrespectful and sick.
Sick is right.

And, not to neglect this, from the same link:
1997: Miss Teen USA contestants say Trump walked in on underage girls dressing backstage: Four women who competed in the contest alleged to BuzzFeed News that Trump walked into the dressing room while they were changing. Tasha Dixon, who competed as Miss USA Arizona—not in the teen competition—in 2001 said: “He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless. Other girls were naked.” Some of the contestants in Miss Teen USA were as young as 15. “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before,” Trump allegedly said.
Combined with this:
2005: Trump admits he looks at naked beauty-pageant contestants: During one of his many appearances on the Howard Stern show, CNN reported Trump said he would go backstage while women were dressing for his Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants. “Well, I’ll tell you the funniest is that before a show, I’ll go backstage and everyone’s getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” Trump said. “You know, I’m inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good.”
Wow, back when I was 12 years old some of the boys thought it would be funny to go into the girls’ dressing room while two of the girls were changing. It’s not funny, and the teacher explained it to us in no uncertain terms.

So, if I learned when I was 12 years old that it’s not funny, and a grown man thinks it’s funny, that’s pretty pathetic.
 
Read the post below, credible sources have cited that FDR was warned about an attack.
He was ‘warned’ (your sources) and your assertion that ‘he knew’ are very different statements. If someone is warned but does not act on the warning this can simply be blindness, willful or not (just like most Trump supporters are blind to what a dangerous monster the man really is). On the other hand, positively knowing but not acting is intentional malice.

You need to be more careful with your statements regarding these issues (other than in this case, I often agree with your posts, by the way).
 
It is an audio recording. An audio recording is a primary source of evidence . It isn’t a quote that Hoaward stern attributed to Trump.

Trumps own words describing behavior that he’s being accused of.
Nah. I betcha that Howard Stern had a Trump impersonator on.

Is it Lent yet? I need to give up conspiracy theories.
 
Remember when we had presidential elections when the focus was on policies and politics? Like Reagan vs Carter, Regean vs Mondale, Bush vs Dukakis, even Clinton vs Bush.

Seems like forever since both parties fielded well-qualified candidates at the same time.
 
Some came out now because of Trump’s lie during the debate on Sunday night. That was upsetting to them and for many, it pushed them over the edge.

.
That’s your belief, and you’re entitled to believe what you want. But we all know at least some of the moderators are in cahoots with the Clinton organization, and we know for sure that the mainstream media coordinates with the Clinton attacks on Trump. Trump was set up for that. The Dems had those women in the wings all along. Never mind that they are just now making the claim after 15 or 30 years, and that some of them don’t make sense.

Podesta’s emails came out and all of a sudden the NYT suddenly “discovered” these women. It’s a crock. They had them in the wings all along for the right moment to deflect from some Clnton scandal.

And that’s my belief. But my further belief is that a campaign that would attack my religion will do anything, without limitation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top