Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately

  • Thread starter Thread starter lmachine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
gracepoole said:
Unwanted groping is certainly sexual assault. I’d prefer not to have a president who is into sexually assaulting women.
Click to expand...
Me too but Bill Clinton served two terms and won the Catholic vote twice …

And people - Read Cathoics who voted for him - knew he was a groper farther out than this in the election process … the information was available and they voted for him

Bill Clinton made it so that I had discuss Oral Sex with my children - what was it, why did the President do that… Are Presidents supposed to lie

Sheesh … ELECTED With the Catholic Vote …

Clinton vetoed the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Twice

Ted Kennedy was a serial groper and even killed a woman and was elected multiple times and always with the Catholic Vote …
 
YADA said:
Me too but Bill Clinton served two terms and won the Catholic vote twice …

And people - Read Cathoics who voted for him - knew he was a groper farther out than this in the election process … the information was available and they voted for him

Bill Clinton made it so that I had discuss Oral Sex with my children - what was it, why did the President do that… Are Presidents supposed to lie

Sheesh … ELECTED With the Catholic Vote …

Clinton vetoed the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Twice

Ted Kennedy was a serial groper and even killed a woman and was elected multiple times and always with the Catholic Vote …
Click to expand...
None of this would justify voting for yet another perpetrator as a Catholic, however, if these allegations are true.
 
YADA said:
Me too but Bill Clinton served two terms and won the Catholic vote twice …

And people - Read Cathoics who voted for him - knew he was a groper farther out than this in the election process … the information was available and they voted for him

Bill Clinton made it so that I had discuss Oral Sex with my children - what was it, why did the President do that… Are Presidents supposed to lie

Sheesh … ELECTED With the Catholic Vote …

Clinton vetoed the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Twice

Ted Kennedy was a serial groper and even killed a woman and was elected multiple times and always with the Catholic Vote …
Click to expand...
So given the two major presidential candidates, what would one have to do NOT to be elected with the Catholic vote (and others)?
 
gracepoole said:
None of this would justify voting for yet another perpetrator as a Catholic, however, if these allegations are true.
Click to expand...
The whole point of these allegations coming out at this time is so that no substantiation is needed to sow suspicion. Trump has already been lynched through the media even when the allegations can’t be shown to be true. Your big “if” is not there.
 
queenofheartscv said:
The whole point of these allegations coming out at this time is so that no substantiation is needed to sow suspicion. Trump has already been lynched through the media even when the allegations can’t be shown to be true. Your big “if” is not there.
Click to expand...
Allegations of sexual assault have been levied at Trump for the past three decades. Is that really just an accident? Coincidence?
 
gracepoole said:
Allegations of sexual assault have been levied at Trump for the past three decades. Is that really just an accident? Coincidence?
Click to expand...
These women have been debunked. I get that you distrust him no matter what. That’s not me.
 
meltzerboy said:
So given the two major presidential candidates, what would one have to do NOT to be elected with the Catholic vote (and others)?
Click to expand...
There are only 2 viable candidates - so one of them will be elected

Historically speaking - killing a person, accusations of rape, adultery, sexual assault and DUI are not valid reasons for a Catholic not to vote for a candidate for President or Senator … that is just a fact … and that does not even count the pro-Abortion stances including being in favor of delivering a full term baby all the way except for their head, then sticking a needle into its head and sucking out its brains - then completing the delivery …

Thus - with great sadness - I would have to say that there is no reason for either of these two candidates not to earn a Catholic vote … though personally I never voted voted for Clinton and Kennedy is from Massachusetts not Oregon …

Oregon has pro-Abortion governors though - even one who was a Catholic and he and his wife were the Honorary Chairs of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon’s Gala Celebration and Fundraiser one year :mad: … did not vote for any of them either …

What I find ironic is that the only time this stuff matter is when its a republican - nver when its a democrat … so explain that for me …
 
queenofheartscv said:
These women have been debunked. I get that you distrust him no matter what. That’s not me.
Click to expand...
If you consider “debunked” to mean Trump absolutely denies their claims, then I guess they have been “debunked”. But most people take that word to mean that something has been proven false to the satisfaction of all
 
LeafByNiggle said:
If you consider “debunked” to mean Trump absolutely denies their claims, then I guess they have been “debunked”.
Click to expand...
TRump has witnesses including person sitting across from seat, the accusers cousin, his butler, other beauty contestants in the room. Apparently they don’t count at all to you.
 
YADA said:
…

What I find ironic is that the only time this stuff matter is when its a republican - nver when its a democrat … so explain that for me …
Click to expand...
Because the GOP advertises themselves as the moral, pro-family, pro-Christian party, implying that the Democrats aren’t.
 
YADA said:
Historically speaking - killing a person, accusations of rape, adultery, sexual assault and DUI are not valid reasons for a Catholic not to vote for a candidate for President or Senator … that is just a fact …
Click to expand...
This is not to derail the thread but what about allowing for abortions in case of rape?
 
YADA said:
There are only 2 viable candidates - so one of them will be elected

Historically speaking - killing a person, accusations of rape, adultery, sexual assault and DUI are not valid reasons for a Catholic not to vote for a candidate for President or Senator … that is just a fact … and that does not even count the pro-Abortion stances including being in favor of delivering a full term baby all the way except for their head, then sticking a needle into its head and sucking out its brains - then completing the delivery …

Thus - with great sadness - I would have to say that there is no reason for either of these two candidates not to earn a Catholic vote … though personally I never voted voted for Clinton and Kennedy is from Massachusetts not Oregon …

Oregon has pro-Abortion governors though - even one who was a Catholic and he and his wife were the Honorary Chairs of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon’s Gala Celebration and Fundraiser one year :mad: … did not vote for any of them either …

What I find ironic is that the only time this stuff matter is when its a republican - nver when its a democrat … so explain that for me …
Click to expand...
I’m voting for Trump because he is surrounding himself with good people, and NO WAY should Clinton be picking the next Supreme Court justices!
 
sallybutler said:
Because the GOP advertises themselves as the moral, pro-family, pro-Christian party, implying that the Democrats aren’t.
Click to expand...
Yes … I had a similar post earlier today
randomuser said:
One party was (past tense) all about “family values.”

No more.

Now, there’s no difference between the two – and, considering that same-sex marriage was legalized by a REPUBLICAN appointee – there’s very little guarantee that Trump’s “pro-life” SCOTUS list will magically overturn Roe v. Wade. Which, I get it, is supposed to be why we all should clamoring to vote for the guy.
Click to expand...
Yes - the Republican Party wants to promote family values and be pro-Life … and some of its members fail - as I responded to RandomUser … - because some people are not perfect does not mean the entire organization or is goals are unimportant.

And we - as Catholics - should know that better than anyone - because if that is true then
our Church was once all about sharing the Gospel and living the Beatitudes but people should write it off into the dust bin of history and never pay it any mind … The Church has no ounce of validity any longer because we had the Clergy Sex Abuse Scandal , thus No More does the Catholic Church represent the Gospel Values of Jesus. There is no difference between the Catholic Church and the Secular Society

Think about that - because that is just what you are implying when you would hold the Republicans accountable for failure while giving a pass to the Democrats whose standard is what? Anything goes and abortion is a good … I mean - its so much harder to fail living up to a standard when there is no standard identified …

That’s what people find so irritating … We have laws - but if you don’t obey them - you are not held accountable … like Bill Clinton - he tried to get people to lie under oath - that is perjury … its against the law - he was sanctioned but not prosecuted … Hillary sends emails that are classified over an insecure illegal server and is not prosecuted - but a Navy Seaman took a picture with his cell phone on a sub and was prosecuted … If I set up an illegal server and sent government emails - I would be prosecuted. I have to take a security training every year on proper use of the government documents … Hillary and her staff - no?

Enter the country illegally and you are not an illegal alien - you are undocumented … want the immigration laws enforced and you are a racist … why do we have laws if they are not enforced? …
 
YADA said:
There are only 2 viable candidates - so one of them will be elected

Historically speaking - killing a person, accusations of rape, adultery, sexual assault and DUI are not valid reasons for a Catholic not to vote for a candidate for President or Senator … that is just a fact … and that does not even count the pro-Abortion stances including being in favor of delivering a full term baby all the way except for their head, then sticking a needle into its head and sucking out its brains - then completing the delivery …

Thus - with great sadness - I would have to say that there is no reason for either of these two candidates not to earn a Catholic vote … though personally I never voted voted for Clinton and Kennedy is from Massachusetts not Oregon …

Oregon has pro-Abortion governors though - even one who was a Catholic and he and his wife were the Honorary Chairs of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon’s Gala Celebration and Fundraiser one year :mad: … did not vote for any of them either …

What I find ironic is that the only time this stuff matter is when its a republican - nver when its a democrat … so explain that for me …
Click to expand...
that is odd.
 
BernadetteM said:
They edited the tape and the only way one can be certain whether Trump just started this conversation or if Billy started it and Trump with his personality felt the need to one up Billy.
Click to expand...
Trump is notorious for threatening and filing lawsuits whether or not he has a case. If the tape was edited he would at the very least threatened a lawsuit as he has done numerous times during this election and hundreds of times in the last decades. He apologized for what he said, he didn’t even threaten legal action.

His threat to sue the NYT over the original story will also amount to nothing except an angry letter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top