UK : "Dangers to Democracy"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Setlam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

UK : Facts reveal that these Elections look as if they have been rigged !​

  • A surprisingly Tiny difference depends from the displacement of less than 1% and a few voters (33% to 35,5%). While everybody agrees that there were some 30% of undecided voters, ready to change until the last minute.
  • But, they could have obviously been influenced, at the last day, by 2 grossly False Polls, (repeated and amplified by Public Sector BBC and other unscrupulous big Media), which erroneously claimed that Mr. Bliar would have outpaced his competitors with a huge a difference of more than … 10 % !.(See our critical publication : “False Polls ?”).
  • Moreover, State-funded BBC and other Media, grossly Censored even simple Citizens’ really Critical publications to their “Public” Forums, up to the last day, in a discriminatory way, while publishing, on the contrary, a lot in favour of Mr. Bliar’s regime, or some anaemic pseudo"opposition". People complained also to be victim of various e-Aggressions, as Blockades of Access to other big Forums, Obstructions against Publishing, unwarned “Disappearance” of earlier published texts, Harassment, etc., up to the last day.
  • Despite all that, (to which may be added, perhaps, also a Posting-votes’ scandal), Mr. Bliar failed to obtain more seats than the … LOWEST number in all UK government’s History ! Added to the huge Abstention, Mr. Bliar, in fact, didn’t get more than some 21% of voters : A tiny percentage, which, naturally, does not give him any legitimacy to decide whatever he wants, not only on British People’s future, but also of EU’s (during the 7-12/2005 British EU Chairmanship), of the World (via G8, etc), nor of main issues affecting all Humankind, (as Cloning and/or Genetic Manipulation of Human Embryos, etc).
+ETC]

=> The overall appraisal of these facts, clearly indicates that the exceptionally “Tight” result of 2005 UK Elections might have been obtained through disloyal and illegal means.

In addition, with some 80% of the People notoriously standing politically against a small 20%, this Government, (moreover led by someone who has been seriously criticized from all sides), will have only an exceptionally Weak moral say, and will be obviously instable or unpopular. While, on the contrary, both Britain, Europe and the World need a strong, democratic, popular and stable leadership.
An independent and transparent investigation should, thus be made, to establish the Truth on the real conditions under which the May 5 UK Elections were conducted.
→ And according to its findings, the Polls should be confirmed
or, on the contrary, totally or partially cancelled and repeated the soonest anew.

This is what should be normally done in a modern Democratic State, with Free People, Pluralist Press, and political class whose leadership would be conscious of its Historic Responsibilities.

 
… Strange : No visible reactions to the last “hot”, topical point…
  • However, it’s obvious that if we really want at least an elementary Democracy and Rule of Law, then,
it’s not only … Ukrianian Elections that should be investigated and repeated anew,

if anomalies that might have misled voters are found.
 
[quote="cainem
]
hey setlam,
…scotland had always a labour majority
[/quote]

On the contrary, looking at BBC’s electoral UK Map today, it seems that most of Scotland voted LibDem (it’s full of Gold-yellow bright color !)… more than any other region.
yip theres definately a conspiracy there
You are welcome to become a little-bit more serious in this thread, more focused on debating Facts and Arguments. Thanks.
i voted labour because they …defend catholic faith schools the libdems and scottish socialists want rid of them
What about Conservatives, then ? You carefully ommit to mention their stance…

Don’t know IF your claims about LibDems or SPS are true and accurate, or not,
but, at any case, one thing is certain :
  • Mr. Bliar, recently, seems to have started desperate attempts to infiltrate also the Catholic Church, particularly through some of his agents in Scotland, and via Europe.
But the Catholic Church is large enough, in the whole Europe and Worldwide,
and it has both Memory, and Consciousness, as well as Principles on crucial issues of substance for all Humanity :
  • Nobody can ignore the Fact that a small but key part of Scottisch, Edinbourgh-linked, bit, became, during Mr. Bliar’s reign, the notorious HeadQuarters of the pro-Cloning/Genetic Manipulation Lobby at its highest,
    (there where “Dolly the sheep” was first cloned, before an atrocious, premature death by genetic deregulation of its ageing process).
  • Nor can anyone forget that it’s precisely that same place which was (according to many Media) at the forefront of a networked-group infamous for opposing late Pope John-Paul II and new Pope Benedictus XVI (previously cardinal Joseph Ratzinger)'s beliefs during the last Conclave, reportedly pushing hard to drop and “reform” them.
  • Moreover, as we already said, there is NOthing really “Catholic”, (not even really Christian, or Humanitarian, by the way), on the contrary, to “Dr. FrankensTony Bliar”'s scandalously DANGEROUS 2005 decision to give permission for Genetic “Tests” on HUMAN Embryos to … “Dolly-the-SHEEP” CLONING “Rosslin” Institute of Edinbourgh, in Scotland !
=> For all these reasons, (and much more, that we have not Time to note here), Please leave any vague and misleading Propaganda only for “NewLab(oratory?)” - “Dr. FrankensTony Bliar”'s agents…

Better focus on replying to Facts and Arguments by more Facts and Arguments, in these Debates.
 
i never carefully omitted the conservative stance, they never mentioned their stance, but on an individual basis our local conservative candidate is against catholic segregation, his words not mine, but since your playing the conspiracy theory game, perhaps the title consevative and unionist says it all, are they using the term unionist for the protestant vote? in this neck of the woods a unionist is a very staunch protestant who is against catholic church and her schooling system
 
40.png
cainem:
…your playing the conspiracy theory game…
???

Could you kindly explain yourself, on what you mean exactly by this Personal Attack, and on what Facts and Arguments you base your claim and your “Theories”, as well as which among the numerous Facts and Arguments that we presented from the outset you started suddenly to contest, now ?
…the title consevative and unionist says it all…
What’s that to do with the main issue of our threads :

On Mr. Bliar’s extreme pro-Cloning and pro-Genetic Manipulation measures,

added to Harassment and Personal Attacks against Critics, according to the Warning by ex-BBC Director, who knew well the David Kelly affair, full of attempts to discredit a dissident who was later found brutally killed ?

Better focus on the main issues, with no more false impressions or misleading diversions with inaccurate and unproven claims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top