This is incorrect, George Tiller had very stringent security measures because he knew he was in danger, (I believe he had is clinic blown up a time or two). The guy who shot him, had studied his movements to find away around the security. Thus it was well known that extremists would and had in the past reacted violently to his actions.
I tried to qualify my statement by saying the dangers were not as widely known as Muslim extremists were known for. I also explained I had to read up to see who he was and in reading found he was shot more than one instance. The other difference, I failed to post but is important, was he did what he felt was lawful to do and did not do it intentionally to incite a people.
Someone posted about the other protests, but has anyone died in those protests? So apparently Muslims aren’t as violent as you are trying to imply. So some Muslims protest peacefully, (stomping on an effigy is still peaceful). Just this one riot in Afghanistan was violent? So I guess it wasn’t so much of a given that his actions would have resulted in violence.
I have been repeatedly posting that I did not think all people of the Islamic faith were violent. I’m sorry I did not make myself clear enough for everyone to understand that.
He admitted, in more than one interview, that he realized, prior to burning the Koran, there was a possibility of a violent reaction from Muslims because of his actions, I also posted the fact that several government officials tried to dissuade him, and that the Vatican and others condemned his plans. Whether everyone wants to admit or not, we all know that the extremists are prone to violence even if it means a suicide attack.
The reason why I cannot put him on the same plane as the people in the riot, is because it took another positive action of another to create the violence. These people didn’t just all see this video all at once and go out on to the street on their own accord to kill UN workers. Rather leaders in the community told them to become violent. Without their actions no violence would have taken place. The pastors actions alone did not create the violence, it took positive actions of other (besides those the did the actual killing) to spark the violence.
I am not trying to measure his sin against the sins of others. I have repeatedly stated it was a shared responsibility between him and those he incited, whether they were incited and called more into the fray or acted directly in the killings. What that measure is, is not for me to judge so, I cannot say. I had thought about asking you to show the source for who called for the violence, but it’s a moot point since they would not have called for the violence without his act having taken place first, in this particular instance.
Now I have, repeatedly, explained my view and have questions out there, for those who disagree that the pastor shares any of the blame, that have not been answered. What suggestions are there for dealing with extremists, living among peaceful and innocent people?