Merely responding to what you think the report says. If there was evidence of a crime, he should have indicted.
lol. That is the ONLY thing that is relevant.
Where’s the indictment?
- Status
M
Maximus1
Guest
But I made sure I would not dignify your post. Lol.
The abuse of power is in the leadership of the intel community under Obama and the Democrat leadership of the House.JonNC:
Failing to impeach Trump will be destructive to the Republic.
His abuse of power cannot go without sanction.
My sincere hope is that Durham will reveal the level of evil in those two groups.
D
dvdjs
Guest
M
Maximus1
Guest
It is pretty clear cut
Last edited:
He should have done what a prosecutor does. He did. He declined to indict.
This is hilarious.
J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
Ooh, see, that is incorrect. What that quote is saying is that Mueller designed his inquiry in such a way that he would not be able to conclude Trump was guilty of crimes.
Last edited:
D
dvdjs
Guest
So you say. Still more shoudda from people not on the job.
Only if deflection is relevant.
Where’s the indictment?
Got none. He spent two years, millions of dollars, used despicable tactics in some instances, and there is no evidence of a crime.
M
Maximus1
Guest
He will be impeached and generations of Americans will know that fact and why, long after we are all dead.
Impeachment always does damage. In this case, there is no choice. His willingness to solicit help for his campaign from another world leader only weeks after he figures he was clear in the Russia investigation validates criminality if they do not take a stand. And they will, and that is a genuine good thing.
Impeachment always does damage. In this case, there is no choice. His willingness to solicit help for his campaign from another world leader only weeks after he figures he was clear in the Russia investigation validates criminality if they do not take a stand. And they will, and that is a genuine good thing.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Lots of indictments. Right?
He could not Indict Trump from the moment he was given the job by Trump’s own appointed.
We didn’t get to see the counter Intel investigation at all.
And I don’t want to have to deal with fudging about what Mueller said. He could not charge and he specifically said he would not recommend charges. The end
He could not Indict Trump from the moment he was given the job by Trump’s own appointed.
We didn’t get to see the counter Intel investigation at all.
And I don’t want to have to deal with fudging about what Mueller said. He could not charge and he specifically said he would not recommend charges. The end
M
Maximus1
Guest
Durham has nothing to do with the issues and evidence in the impeachment inquiry. Those witnesses are diplomats and Trump’s own people.
And maybe it will open their eyes to the dangers of a strong central government that uses furs intel community to try to overturn an election. We can only hope.
Correct. It is the only way to overturn the 2016 election.
And this is the lie that is being fed by the MSM /DNC.
I know that is your talking point. The fact is he could, had he chosen to, challenged the OLC opinion. He chose not to because there was no crime.
And therefore, he declined to indict. He could have. He could have challenged the OLC opinion. He chose not to. That’s called declination.
There is no inquiry yet. In a very cowardly way, and in order to prevent Republicans from call witnesses, they haven’t held a vote.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Overturn an election.
That is Trump apologist thinking and propaganda. The rest of us never think the thought until one of you bring it up. In America, once an election is over, that’s generally it.
I don’t recall the idea with Clinton and Nixon. With WBush, it was understandable in the short run because the 2000 election came down to 500+ votes in a nation with hundreds of millions.
Birther is the only thing close. But that was Trump and others delegitimizing the first black president. I doubt I they cared about birthplace. It was a way to create political backing.
It is to bad some cannot accept the truth. This was an unforced error on Trump’s part, so to speak.
Who in America didn’t know a president cannot ask a foreign president to help with election issues after Russia? When the hearing comes in November, that is what they will proove. Everything I have seen makes it a powerful case. You have his top adviser admitting quid pro quo and saying GET OVER IT.
YOU have West POINT GRADS / Vets, hand picked and plucked from retirement by TRUMPS OWN SECRETARY OF STATE testifying to the entire scheme.
You have the firing of an ambasador with no excuse but clearly, she was in the way.
You have Rudy creating a shadow diplomacy. He is under criminal investigation.( RUSSIAN’S involved as usual).
Most of all, the notes from the Trump phone call, which THIS TIME, ties Trump directly.
Bolton should provide the last shovel of dirt.
When they impeach him, this will be the proof. You can vote that it I impeachable or not. 51% of America says it is. Clinton’s highest approval day of his 8 years was the day he was impeached. In the mid to high 60s if I recall. Trump won’t be close.
The VP becomes President. It does not really overturn. This president is taking the position he is 100% immune from accountability for any crime. If a president intends to consider that an opportunity, impeachment I the nation’s only defense.
You say his accusers are lying, but I see only testimony under oath, transcripts, admissions and action. I don’t see anything but a naked allegation of lie. I see him stonewalling as well. It seems clear, there is no lie that anyone can actually identify. That is why they are defending on procedure. Talking about the facts, even in defense, will incriminate him
That is Trump apologist thinking and propaganda. The rest of us never think the thought until one of you bring it up. In America, once an election is over, that’s generally it.
I don’t recall the idea with Clinton and Nixon. With WBush, it was understandable in the short run because the 2000 election came down to 500+ votes in a nation with hundreds of millions.
Birther is the only thing close. But that was Trump and others delegitimizing the first black president. I doubt I they cared about birthplace. It was a way to create political backing.
It is to bad some cannot accept the truth. This was an unforced error on Trump’s part, so to speak.
Who in America didn’t know a president cannot ask a foreign president to help with election issues after Russia? When the hearing comes in November, that is what they will proove. Everything I have seen makes it a powerful case. You have his top adviser admitting quid pro quo and saying GET OVER IT.
YOU have West POINT GRADS / Vets, hand picked and plucked from retirement by TRUMPS OWN SECRETARY OF STATE testifying to the entire scheme.
You have the firing of an ambasador with no excuse but clearly, she was in the way.
You have Rudy creating a shadow diplomacy. He is under criminal investigation.( RUSSIAN’S involved as usual).
Most of all, the notes from the Trump phone call, which THIS TIME, ties Trump directly.
Bolton should provide the last shovel of dirt.
When they impeach him, this will be the proof. You can vote that it I impeachable or not. 51% of America says it is. Clinton’s highest approval day of his 8 years was the day he was impeached. In the mid to high 60s if I recall. Trump won’t be close.
The VP becomes President. It does not really overturn. This president is taking the position he is 100% immune from accountability for any crime. If a president intends to consider that an opportunity, impeachment I the nation’s only defense.
You say his accusers are lying, but I see only testimony under oath, transcripts, admissions and action. I don’t see anything but a naked allegation of lie. I see him stonewalling as well. It seems clear, there is no lie that anyone can actually identify. That is why they are defending on procedure. Talking about the facts, even in defense, will incriminate him
M
Maximus1
Guest
But they will. A full hearing and an impeachment vote is coming.
They are not allowing a circus. And of course Trump lost in court this week. It is an impeachment inquiry according to the Court. They weren’t cowards, they were correct.
They have a simple and devistating case. They do not intend to let it be derailed by confusion of the issues.
They are not allowing a circus. And of course Trump lost in court this week. It is an impeachment inquiry according to the Court. They weren’t cowards, they were correct.
They have a simple and devistating case. They do not intend to let it be derailed by confusion of the issues.
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
@JonNC, if you really want to know how people feel about Trump outside of his rallies, here’s an example:
www.newsweek.com
I’ve stopped responding to your posts on this thread because you are just saying the same things over and over again, and they are just partisan rants. You are reaching conclusions that are not based on the facts and not actually engaging in discussion. I’m not going to change your mind, and you are not going to change mine.
I realize you a fervent Trump supporter, but you can still support Trump while acknowledging the truth.
Donald Trump's Face Drops As He Notices Crowd Booing at World Series
Washington Nationals and Houston Astros fans cheered and applauded as players stepped up to their bases. But the atmosphere turned when President Trump appeared on the jumbotron.
www.newsweek.com
I’ve stopped responding to your posts on this thread because you are just saying the same things over and over again, and they are just partisan rants. You are reaching conclusions that are not based on the facts and not actually engaging in discussion. I’m not going to change your mind, and you are not going to change mine.
I realize you a fervent Trump supporter, but you can still support Trump while acknowledging the truth.
M
Metis1
Guest
Yep, and I tend to believe the worse is yet to come-- unfortunately.
- Status