Unamerican Secret Trial presided by Democrat Adam Schiff

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
JapaneseKappa said:
That’s fine though. It’d be like if a kid snuck into his school at night to play a prank, and caught another kid trying to burn the school down. Sure, the prankster shouldn’t have been sneaking in, but it doesn’t change the fact that he caught an arsonist. What the republicans are trying to do is make it seem like the arsonist did nothing wrong, so they’re desperately accusing the other kid of any and everything they can think of.
Click to expand...
This is close, except its the arsonist that accused the prankster of the actual arson and had all the resources spent investigating the prankster for the crimes committed by the arsonist. Now they may be in trouble so are trying to tie the prankster to all the other fires the arsonist set.

The Dems are notorious for blaming and accusing others of their crimes. Your doing right here in your fancy memes and posts.
 
Woodyl57 said:
This is close, except its the arsonist that accused the prankster of the actual arson and had all the resources spent investigating the prankster for the crimes committed by the arsonist.
Click to expand...
Except there is no evidence of this. It is a literal conspiracy theory. It is literally designed to distract from the president’s crimes. And on the other hand, there is significant evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the president.
 
Last edited:
JapaneseKappa said:
Except there is no evidence of this. It is a literal conspiracy theory. It is literally designed to distract from the president’s crimes.
Click to expand...
Haha

Durham didn’t switch his investigation to a criminal inquiry because there is no evidence of criminal activity involved the allegations investigated for over 2 years. The President has not been convicted of any crimes. You can’t accept that fine.
 
If the emails between Lisa Page and Peter Stroke in addition to the on tape comments by various Dems saying Trump must be impeached,before and since his taking g office isn’t enough to show the underhanded agendas the Dems , I don’t know what else can to be said.
The continuous circular arguments the past three years with those opposed to Trump never ever conceding what has been made obvious “no there there “ is beyond its shelf life.Tiresome
 
Nice article. I will not debate the 10 reasons it gives, most likely some are true and some are false and some are a little but of both.

So if Trump runs against Warren (for example) as a Christian which am I “allowed” to vote for and still be allowed to be called a Christian by you?

(BTW, I voted for Rubio in the primary)

See this article from this past March. I am not saying I personally agree with the writer of this article. The point is your article is the same stuff as this article from the other side.

medium.com

Dever and Leeman Are Wrong — Christians Can Have No Fellowship with Democrats

It is Necessary for Christians to Be Anti-Democrat
medium.com medium.com

These articles are both of the same nature. They don’t just explain why the writer, as a Christian, votes the way they do. They try and make the case that anyone who doesn’t see it their way is not a real Christian.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, maybe we should look into Ukrainian corruption.

I have to say, I had no idea so many people were involved in working with Ukraine. Working with Ukraine in and of itself isn’t a problem, but it seems like an awful lot of Americans had dealings there.

thehill.com

Perry backers secured lucrative Ukraine gas deal after his meeting with new president: report

Two political backers of Energy Secretary Rick Perry landed a lucrative oil and gas exploration deal from Ukraine’s government shortly after Perry reportedly included one of the two men in a …
thehill.com thehill.com
 
One does not have to vote for either a Democratic nor a Republican candidate if they feel that neither upholds basic Judeo-Christian morals.
 
That is true, I agree. But many people feel they vote for these best of the viable candidates.

Many Christians have been voting Democratic for a long time despite the pro abortion views as they feel the other side is worse on other issues that out way the abortion views. I don’t agree with that but would not doubt their christian beliefs.
 
Metis1 . . .
One does not have to vote for either a Democratic nor a Republican candidate if they feel that neither upholds basic Judeo-Christian morals.
Click to expand...
You’ll have to make those decisions yourself Metis1.

The problem is, I have had a lot of people attempt to make that decision FOR ME.

Now they are doing it again with a phony “impeachment” consideration.

None of this (making my decisions for me or illicitily removing a candidate) upholds basic Judeo-Christian morals either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top