D
dvdjs
Guest
… to name a few agencies.IRS, DOJ, FBI to name a few.
Would a truthful one suffice, honestly?I would love a first hand and truthful account
… to name a few agencies.IRS, DOJ, FBI to name a few.
Would a truthful one suffice, honestly?I would love a first hand and truthful account
There are conspiracies all around. The problem is that so many are involved that collusion among them keeps the real truth from coming out.Any facts available now to inform opinions, or is it all wishful thinking an conspiracy theorizing?
Makes you wonder what is being cooked up next when this one fails.Still believe in Trump-Russia collusion do we? Haven’t realized it was all wishful thinking – which is why it morphed into wishful impeachment for Ukraine collusion?
Of course. It is well documented on the Muller report.Still believe in Trump-Russia collusion do we?
Lindsey Graham: When We Find Out Whistleblower Is from the Deep State — ‘This Thing’s Going to Stink to High Heaven’
PAM KEY
10 Nov 2019 Breitbart News
On this week’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said he was “confident” the whistleblower is from the “deep state.”
Graham said, “It’s impossible to bring this case forward in my view fairly without us knowing who the whistleblower is and having a chance to cross-examine them about any advice they may have, if they don’t call the whistleblower in the House, this thing is dead on arrival on the Senate.” . . .
. . . No American can be accused of a crime based on an anonymous allegation. The whistleblower is foundational to what they are doing to the House and the fact that they don’t want to call him tells you everything that you need to know how about valid the effort is to impeachment the president.” . . .
. . . I’m confident you are going to find out it’s somebody from the deep state. You are going to find out they had interactions with the Schiff, and this thing’s going to stink to high Heaven. The only reason we don’t know who the whistleblower is it hurts their cause, they are not trying to find the truth here.”
(Some reports have this sum at $80,000/mo. Either way. Large sums of money for someone with no experience in this situation)Schiff Rejects GOP Request for ‘Whistleblower’ Testimony as ‘Redundant and Unnecessary’
![]()
Scott Olson/Getty Images
BREITBART NEWS
10 Nov 20 2019 Breitbart News
Nov. 10 (UPI) — House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff described a request by the Republicans for public testimony this week by the whistle-blower who sparked an impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump as “redundant and unnecessary.”
On Saturday, House intelligence committee ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., sent a list of witnesses they would like to interview to Schiff, including Hunter Biden, the son of former vice President Joe Biden. The letter was five pages.
Schiff, a Democrat from California, responded to the letter later Saturday with his own two-page letter. . . . .
. . . In September, Schiff said the whistle-blower would appear before Congress “very soon,” but later has said the testimony is unnecessary.
In the phone call Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to conduct an investigation of the Bidens. Without confirmation, Joe Biden pressured former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire a top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, where Hunter served on the board, bringing in a reported $50,000 per month. . . .
Schiff Rejects GOP Request for 'Whistleblower' Testimony as 'Redundant and Unnecessary' - Breitbart. . . . The GOP’s witness list also named another former Burisma board member, Devon Archer; former Democratic National Committee staffer Alexandra Chalupa; Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs David Hale; former National Security Council official Tim Morrison; former contractor for Fusion GPS Nellie Ohr; former U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker; and the individuals from which the whistle-blower obtained information about the phone call.
On Saturday, Trump suggested other names should be added to the list for the inquiry, which he continues to call a “witch hunt.” He said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Schiff and Joe Biden should be called to testify.
. . . Nancy Pelosi . . . Adam Schiff . . Joe Biden, the Whistleblower (who miraculously disappeared after I released the transcript of the call), the 2nd Whistleblower (who also disappeared), & the I.G. . . .
. . . Trump has been critical of Schiff for his “parody” reading of Trump’s July phone call during a hearing in September. The White House earlier realeased its transcript version of the call. . . .
@Maximus1Overturn an election.
That is Trump apologist thinking and propaganda. The rest of us never think the thought until one of you bring it up. In America, once an election is over, that’s generally it.
I don’t recall the idea with Clinton and Nixon. With WBush, it was understandable in the short run because the 2000 election came down to 500+ votes in a nation with hundreds of millions.
Birther is the only thing close. But that was Trump and others delegitimizing the first black president. I doubt I they cared about birthplace. It was a way to create political backing.
It is to bad some cannot accept the truth. This was an unforced error on Trump’s part, so to speak.
Who in America didn’t know a president cannot ask a foreign president to help with election issues after Russia? When the hearing comes in November, that is what they will proove. Everything I have seen makes it a powerful case. You have his top adviser admitting quid pro quo and saying GET OVER IT.
YOU have West POINT GRADS / Vets, hand picked and plucked from retirement by TRUMPS OWN SECRETARY OF STATE testifying to the entire scheme.
You have the firing of an ambasador with no excuse but clearly, she was in the way.
You have Rudy creating a shadow diplomacy. He is under criminal investigation.( RUSSIAN’S involved as usual).
Most of all, the notes from the Trump phone call, which THIS TIME, ties Trump directly.
Bolton should provide the last shovel of dirt.
When they impeach him, this will be the proof. You can vote that it I impeachable or not. 51% of America says it is. Clinton’s highest approval day of his 8 years was the day he was impeached. In the mid to high 60s if I recall. Trump won’t be close.
The VP becomes President. It does not really overturn. This president is taking the position he is 100% immune from accountability for any crime. If a president intends to consider that an opportunity, impeachment I the nation’s only defense.
You say his accusers are lying, but I see only testimony under oath, transcripts, admissions and action. I don’t see anything but a naked allegation of lie. I see him stonewalling as well. It seems clear, there is no lie that anyone can actually identify. That is why they are defending on procedure. Talking about the facts, even in defense, will incriminate him
So goes your reliance on facts. LolOf course. It is well documented on the Muller report.
Huh? …So goes your reliance on facts
It is factually conclusive on collusion. It also made a conclusion that the evidence of conspiracy did not rise to the level required for prosecution. It remains to be seen what the House does the evidence gathered by Mueller.You use the Mueller Report,