Hi Homerun. As a Canadian, I’m going to have to assert that you’ve got lot of misconceptions regarding our health care system.
Third, countries such as Canada have established this policy, and it has been a failure. Canadians are always coming to hospitals in the USA.
No actually our policy has been phenomenally successful. Everyone gets treatment when they need it. No one is refused help at or conveyance to a hospital because they don’t have the right insurance or they can’t pay for the procedure. As for Canadians going to the US, it
virtually never happens, except in situations where one has a lot of money, and the specific treatment or leading expert, (as often is the case) is at a clinic in the US. Look, no matter what system you have in place, the wealthy will always be able to pay through the nose for the best care, and thats fine by me. What I consider the great success of our system is that everybody receives an acceptable level of care.
Case in point, a year ago I ruptured 3 ligaments in my right knee (semi competitive soccer). I will be operated on this summer. It has taken a while for me to get treatment, but that, to me is perfectly acceptable considering I will be operated on by the same doctor who works on our professional hockey players. I will be playing soccer again competitively a year from now. Is this level of care available to the average Joe in the US?
First, the doctor-patient ratio would increase, and doctors would be seeing more patients and therefore not be able to treat each one as well.
Hasn’t been the case here - because the gov’t provides the health care, they ensure that enough docs are hired to take care of the population. In a private system docs go where the money is - in a public system they are sent where they are needed.
Second, people with terminal illnesses would not be able to get treated as quickly, due to a longer waiting list
.
People with terminal ilnesses get extremely rapid treatment. Non-essential treatments (like mine - I still function fine, just can’t play sports) wait longer - again, no biggie if I have to wait a little longer because someone’s heart is being transplanted.
Fourth, the status quo ensures treatment for every patient already. No doctor can reject a patient in a hospital for the lack of funding. Problem appears to be solved already.
So then its not a big deal that 70 million Americans have no health insurance? (can’t remember where I heard that #)
Fifth, the funds required for the government mandate this program would be through the roof, and thus money could not be spent elsewhere, on problems that truly do need funding (environment, protecting the troops, immigration problems, economic stimulus, etc.)
While it is true that tracking and forecasting the cost of health care is problematic, we don’t seem to have terrible difficulty taking care of the other things you mentioned that truly need funding… granted we don’t have as impressive a military but the rest is doing ok…
The counter-plan would be this: provide incentives for private industries to contribute to the American health care system. This way, doctors would not have such strict regulations, the advantages of the current system would be maintained, and the government would not be spending so much money.
I have to be honest with you, I have no desire whatsoever for US style health care. The Canadian system takes good care of me, thanks very much. I would be interested to know what advantages “the current system” has?