Oh, that is music to my ears. I hope I hear it more and more often.Vatican officials were not persuaded by the American bishops’ arguments…The Vatican concluded that the document’s release date should not be based on circumstances only in the US, he said.
What? The bishops were afraid that the if the document were released on so and so date, they were afraid the gay communities would be angered? That makes no sense.
Link
He continued: “We said, 'If you do this, it will be taken as a commentary on the visitations and we’ll get into this whole business that the gay community is so sensitive to of, ‘You’re blaming us for the pedophilia.’”?
And we would not want to stand up for the truth?
Me too. God bless Pope Benedict!!Oh, that is music to my ears. I hope I hear it more and more often.
They like to disconnect sin from their own corruptions.Why is Cardinal George still referring to it as a “pedophilia” problem? What DO those bishops do with the studies they commission, anyway?
And shame on them for covering up the sex abuse scandal and not telling the holy father in Rome the truth. Namely, the failure of the bishops to communicate with the pope. Because they felt “unconfortable” talking about it. I’ve protested to them month after month and still have had no answer from them. Not one.Shame on them for telling the Mother Church how to do her job when they couldn’t even handle the domestic affairs!
Could it be that many of those in the USCCB are pro-gay or homosexual themselves?Hmmm… Interesting how the USCCB seems to know exactly what the “gay community” will think of certain issues. Interesting that they are concerned about it… :ehh:
I think it remains to be seen whether it is a “success” or a “disaster” as you put it. It will surely not ingratiate the Church to the liberal and gay factions, but then that is to be expected. As far as interpreting it, the Cardinal who wrote it explained it in the press shortly after…but if people don’t want to hear …then they will claim it is up to them and that gay seminarians who are celibate should be welcomed. (Note: this is NOT what the author of the document is saying.) Any Vatican document depends on faithful bishops to teach enforce it; the bishops sure made a mess of Humanae Vitae in the 1960’s, didn’t they?It does seem like this document was a bit of a disaster for the pope. Within a day of the pope releasing it, there were bishops all over the world claiming that the document was not quite as it seemed, and that it was at the discretion of the Bishop to interpret it etc.
My recollection was that it was individual bishops who wanted a delay, not the USCCB; do you have information that they actuallly made a statement (the USCCB)?Hmmm… Interesting how the USCCB seems to know exactly what the “gay community” will think of certain issues. Interesting that they are concerned about it… :ehh:
I don’t have the document at hand, but my recollection is that the document can be read without distortion to allow the ordination of some who have been celibate for a period of time. There was a good bit of commentary by those who wanted an absolute ban that Rome did not give one.I think it remains to be seen whether it is a “success” or a “disaster” as you put it. It will surely not ingratiate the Church to the liberal and gay factions, but then that is to be expected. As far as interpreting it, the Cardinal who wrote it explained it in the press shortly after…but if people don’t want to hear …then they will claim it is up to them and that gay seminarians who are celibate should be welcomed. (Note: this is NOT what the author of the document is saying.) Any Vatican document depends on faithful bishops to teach enforce it; the bishops sure made a mess of Humanae Vitae in the 1960’s, didn’t they?
If I remember correctly, I believe the celibate period is three years. And those three years have to be proven.I don’t have the document at hand, but my recollection is that the document can be read without distortion to allow the ordination of some who have been celibate for a period of time. There was a good bit of commentary by those who wanted an absolute ban that Rome did not give one.
Most of Europe is no longer Christian. I’m not sure why it is, but its not unreasonable to assume that two world wars and a cold war would sap the faith out of any culture. America has not seen such bloodshed on its soil since the Civil War in the 1860s, only Europe had two wars back to back of that magnitude or greater in 1914-18 and 1939-45. But needless to say the Holy Father’s messages carry very little weight in his own back yard nowadays, its very distressing.Yes, this does seem like pandering on the bishops part but as the article said, this is for the entire Church not just the church in the U.S. What troubles me more about this article was another link from the same issue that stated that the EU would sanction any countries that did not accept and permit “same-sex marriages” - this indeed is a scary threat. Western Europe has completely gone off the rails in my opinion. They are becoming an increasingly secular and godless society.
That is how some read it, but the document does not say be celibate for three years, it says have no tendencies for at least three years.I don’t have the document at hand, but my recollection is that the document can be read without distortion to allow the ordination of some who have been celibate for a period of time. There was a good bit of commentary by those who wanted an absolute ban that Rome did not give one.