N
Naomi
Guest
Thanks Lizzie ! The culperts were NOT Southern. I deal with as much prejudice for being Southern as I do for being Catholic.
I hope you have noted that the MSM have done much to fabricate news about the South.Thanks Lizzie ! The culperts were NOT Southern. I deal with as much prejudice for being Southern as I do for being Catholic.
Was this the statute?Our pastor talked about this incident in his homily on Sunday.
Our pastor told us that he wrote the Pastor of the Alabama church to tell him that there is a Federal Law (but I can’t remember which statute, or citation number), that these vandals can be Federally Prosecuted and CAN BE put in jail for 5 years or More.
It has something to do with interrupting a religious service.
If someobody knows more about this statute, comment about it here.
I believe that’s the one, Thanks!Was this the statute?
18 U.S.C. § 247. Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in
the free exercise of religious beliefs
(a) Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section —
(1) intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real
property, because of the religious character of that property, or
attempts to do so; or
(2) intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).
(b) The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the
offense is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce.
(c) Whoever intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property because of the race, color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with that religious property, or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).
(d) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) of this section
shall be —
(1) if death results from acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, a fine in accordance with this title and imprisonment for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death;
(2) if bodily injury results to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, and the violation is by means of fire or an explosive, a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more that 40 years, or both;
(3) if bodily injury to any person, including any public safety officer performing duties as a direct or proximate result of conduct prohibited by this section, results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, a fine in accordance wit hthis title and imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both; and
(4) in any other case, a fine in accordance with this title and
imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
(e) No prosecution of any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except upon the certification in writing of the Attorney General or his designee that in his judgment a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.
(f) As used in this section, the term “religious real property” means any church, synagogue, mosque, religious cemetery, or other religious real property, including fixtures or religious objects contained within a place of religious worship.
(g) No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any
noncapital offense under this section unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.
You’re welcome.I believe that’s the one, Thanks!
Now reading the article, you can see that this situation should fit into this precident.
I just hope any Church/Diocese will take this action and prosecute in Federal Court, since we DO have this legislature and tool at our use.You’re welcome.Happy to do it.
Any way we perhaps can pursuade them to do so? Perhaps a well written letter (or several) saying its time for this to stop?I just hope any Church/Diocese will take this action and prosecute in Federal Court, since we DO have this legislature and tool at our use.
I am sorry to say you are misinformed.There is a lot of hate by Protestants in the South. Hate of Jews. Hate of Blacks. Hate of Catholics. When the state supreme court chief justice, Roy Moore, who is now going to run for governor, put the granite monument with the ten commandments on it in the center of the court house, many Catholics supported him. Most Jewish people opposed him. The jews realize that at first these actions are against the non-Judeo-Christians, then they’ll be against the non-Christians, then they’ll be against the non-protestants, and finally they’ll be against the non-fundamentalist protestants.
Someone above mentioned that the press used a lot of protestant terminaology in describing the desecration in the Catholic Mass. They may have gotten some of that from the members of the parish themselves, although I don’t know for sure. I have noticed in Alabama that many non-protestant churches try to blend in.
For example, sadly, one of the Jewish congregations in northern Alabama didn’t have their first Bar Mitzvah until around 1948. The congregation had been formed and had a synagogue in the mid or late 1800s. The reason that hey hadn’t had a Bar Mitzvah in all of those decades was that they correctly realized that they had to blend in and “look like” the other churches which of course were Protestant fundamentalists.
It is very sad.
- Kathie :bowdown:
So are you really saying that parts of the south are not anti-Jewish, Catholic, black, etc? Well, you are the one who is sadly mistaken if that is the case. Between 1989 and 1991, I was stationed in Charleston, South Carolina. We became friendly with the neighbors. When they found out we were Catholic, they were shocked. They tried to convert us, then shunned us. You see, all Catholics are basically worshippers of Satan.I am sorry to say you are misinformed.
I am a Catholic who has lived in the Bible Belt for almost 40 years. My non-Catholic neighbors and former co-workers are kind and generous.So are you really saying that parts of the south are not anti-Jewish, Catholic, black, etc? Well, you are the one who is sadly mistaken if that is the case. Between 1989 and 1991, I was stationed in Charleston, South Carolina. We became friendly with the neighbors. When they found out we were Catholic, they were shocked. They tried to convert us, then shunned us. You see, all Catholics are basically worshippers of Satan.
What it comes down to, you may not have experienced southern bigotry, but many of us have.
CatholicChef said:waff.com/Global/story.asp?s=3937358
This is considered the bible belt and the protestants here spend more time trying to convert us than they do worshipping. It’s really sad.
The problem with messages like this they are open to interpretation. What did the vandals expect memebers of the parish to do? Collectively smack themselves on the forhead in realization of their “error”? Whatever.“I hope no one got hurt. That wasn’t our intention. But we had a message to deliver. We delivered it,” says Turgeon.
Informed has nothing to do with it. It is what I personally observe.I am sorry to say you are misinformed.
I would predict a small fine, and maybe some probation. Think what would have happened in the press if this was a black Baptist church. It would have been on CNN in no time.Naaah! It isn’t a hate crime. You can only commit a hate crime against Jews, Moslems, Homosexuals and non-whites.
Catholics aren’t a protected class. It appears you can commit any premeditated crime of hate you want against Catholics and it could never be considered a hate crime. It is painfully obvious you can bash and trash all things Catholic.
Just watch…They’ll get off with some kind of slap of the wrist.
It depends on why the people were storming the church as to the likelihood of TV news coverage. If they came in screaming racial slurs at a congregation of any race other than their own, then yes the news might cover it because it would get more ratings. The same thing would happen if someone came in with a racially motivated attack on a Catholic parish that was predominantly black, so what is your point? That in your opinion Baptists get more national TV news coverage or that blacks do? What does that have to do with the desecration of this particular Catholic church anyway since they clearly did get media coverage or we would not know about the story?I would predict a small fine, and maybe some probation. Think what would have happened in the press if this was a black Baptist church. It would have been on CNN in no time.