Vatican adds 7 new mortal sins

  • Thread starter Thread starter reteeks21
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
perhaps if there are statistics which supports your assertions. on the contrary stats show that poorer places have higher crime rates. slum areas. the third world. you name it.
Again we are talking sin here, not crime! There are lots of sins that might be made legal; particularly in the form that it takes when the rich commit them. The British made it a crime for Indians to make salt in a country where salt was necessary to survive so that they could tax them. It might have been a crime for Ghandi to make salt, but the sin was with the British for essentially extorting money from the Indians for their survival.


Bill
 
use ratio & proportion if you like. but the fact is, the wealthy have very little reason to steal. and lesser reason to kill. (thats why if the wealthy steals, i think thats greed to the highest degree, and they should burn in hell for that)
They may have very little reason to steal if we look at it from a perspective of need, but yet there are many wealthy who in fact do the moral equivalent of stealing all the time.
I think it is also a question of how one defines it. Yes a rich person is not likely to mug someone on the street, but they are far more likely to manipulate stocks or commodities, to steal millions from their company or clients, to convince people that the stock of their company is going to go up while they sell the stock at the same time.
there is no evidence for that assumption.

You seem to idolize the rich. Almost by definition what I stated above is true if for no other reason than the rich have the opportunity to do it and the poor do not.
even so, the west is still a wealthy region. instead outsourcing is elevating the economies of poorer countries.
I don’t have a problem with elevating the economies of the third world, but that is only a happy side effect of what the companies are doing and it comes at the cost of an unjust means (i.e. the taking of jobs from those who need them in another part of the world).
I agree absolutely. I just think that the poor is in more danger of committing more serious atrocities than wealthy people.
No, the poor are more likely to commit crimes that will impact other individuals. The rich are more likely to commit crimes that will impact thousands.


Bill
 
Again we are talking sin here, not crime!
crimes are sins, more often than not. sins that are not crimes: cursing, lying, cheating, bullying. theres plenty of those in slum areas and the 3rd world.

the sins of the rich has often more to do with arrogance, pride & selfishness.
 
crimes are sins, more often than not. sins that are not crimes: cursing, lying, cheating, bullying. theres plenty of those in slum areas and the 3rd world.

the sins of the rich has often more to do with arrogance, pride & selfishness.

jesus was wrong in assuming that its practically impossible for rich people to be saved.
I will try to remember to tell Him when I see Him.

edit… I see that you removed that line from your original thought
 
crimes are sins, more often than not. sins that are not crimes: cursing, lying, cheating, bullying. theres plenty of those in slum areas and the 3rd world.

the sins of the rich has often more to do with arrogance, pride & selfishness.
There is also plenty of cursing, lying, cheating and bullying going on in the boardrooms of Corporate America.

In any case, the point here is ultimately, there is plenty of sin amongst the rich, and some of that sin stems directly from the fact that they are rich.


Bill
 
You seem to idolize the rich. Almost by definition what I stated above is true if for no other reason than the rich have the opportunity to do it and the poor do not.
I was just ticked off by the OP which falsely said that being filtyhy rich is considered a mortal sin. And you seem to imply that the rich is more wicked than the rest of us. Even jesus suggests that the wealthy is practically impossible from attaining salvation.

theres no sense in any of those ideas.
at the cost of an unjust means (i.e. the taking of jobs from those who need them in another part of the world).
thousands of companies have outsourced and yet the west is still well off. laid off westerners do know how to adapt with the changing workplace. they are not as oppressed as you would like to think.
No, the poor are more likely to commit crimes that will impact other individuals. The rich are more likely to commit crimes that will impact thousands.
that is true. thats why i said that the thieving wealthy deserves hell. i was only pointing out that crime among the wealthy has a much lower rate than crime among the poor.
 
Not for nothing but the Vatican and the Catholic Church in general are what I would describe as “filthy rich”, is this an example of “do as I say not as I do”?
They are!?!?!:eek:

Can you prove to me that this statement is true?:rolleyes:
 
I was just ticked off by the OP which falsely said that being filtyhy rich is considered a mortal sin. And you seem to imply that the rich is more wicked than the rest of us. Even jesus suggests that the wealthy is practically impossible from attaining salvation.

theres no sense in any of those ideas.
There is sense in those words, just ones that our modern world is finding harder and harder to listen to. We need to remember the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. As we feast, others in the world starve. Too many of us are ready to believe that because we did not cause their starvation, that we are virtuous. We need to remember that to do nothing to help them (or practically nothing) is itself sinful.
thousands of companies have outsourced and yet the west is still well off. laid off westerners do know how to adapt with the changing workplace. they are not as oppressed as you would like to think.
Care to tell that to the people’s whose jobs are actually outsourced? There are many former textile workers in the Carolinas who will never make the same wages they made at the textile mills before their jobs were outsourced. Even if they recover, that is hardly a justification. Most people who are mugged recover and prosper afterwards, that doesn’t make mugging them right.

The basic problem with your assertion is that since as a whole we are better off, then the harm we did to others is ok. If we have to harm 1 person to make 100 better off, it does not matter what benefit the 100 receive, it is still wrong.
that is true. thats why i said that the thieving wealthy deserves hell. i was only pointing out that crime among the wealthy has a much lower rate than crime among the poor.
But again, crime is totally irrelevant. The rich can and do harm the poor and the middle class every day in the name of progress. It is all legal, but it doesn’t make it moral.


Bill
 
There is sense in those words, just ones that our modern world is finding harder and harder to listen to. We need to remember the story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. As we feast, others in the world starve. Too many of us are ready to believe that because we did not cause their starvation, that we are virtuous. We need to remember that to do nothing to help them (or practically nothing) is itself sinful.
its not that simple. wealth serves as incentives for people to work hard. the desire for wealth creates jobs. and the presence of wealth fuels creativity. its wrong to just dismiss wealthy people as like camels trying to enter the eye of a needle. like what you said, wealthy people have their own set of temptations. but there is no reason to believe that the challenges they encounter make them more wicked than the average guy.
Care to tell that to the people’s whose jobs are actually outsourced?
Like my wife, and her friends. When their medical tools company went to mexico. They found other jobs rather quickly. Some invested in education and became accountants. My wife became a computer technician. And the west is still wealthy.
The basic problem with your assertion is that since as a whole we are better off, then the harm we did to others is ok. If we have to harm 1 person to make 100 better off, it does not matter what benefit the 100 receive, it is still wrong.
are you saying that outsourcing permanently raises the unemployment rate? because if it doesnt, then you have no point.
 
Not for nothing but the Vatican and the Catholic Church in general are what I would describe as “filthy rich”, is this an example of “do as I say not as I do”?
Contrary to popular impression, the Vatican is a spartan operation. Its annual operating budget is about $277 million. The University of Notre Dame’s annual operating budget, by comparison, is $700 million. The Vatican’s endowment is about $770 million. By contrast, the University of Notre Dame’s endowment is $3.1 billion. The Holy See is indeed in need of financial support from the Catholic world, and American Catholics usually supply about 25 percent of the annual operating budget.

What about the artwork—the Pietà, the Raphael frescoes, and so on? These treasures are literally priceless, but they appear on the Vatican books with a value of one euro. According to the [laws] of the Vatican City State, they may never be sold or borrowed against.

The “wealth” of the Vatican has accumulated over the centuries and is basically art work, historical documents, and buildings. The Vatican views these buildings, historical documents, and works of art as belonging to all peoples - they are merely under the care of the Vatican. They are not for sell because the Vatican doesn’t view them as its personal property too sell. Why not sell all the works of art in the Louvre? Or in New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art? Why not sell the Mona Lisa to feed the poor? Why don’t museums sell off their Rembrandts and Van Goghs and Picassos to feed the poor?

About 20 years ago, Peter Drucker, the management consultant, concluded that the three most efficient organizations in history were General Motors, the 19th-century Prussian Army, and the Catholic Church. He put the Church on his list because it manages to hold a worldwide organization together with an exceptionally small central headquarters. For the 1.1 billion Catholics, there are about 1,700 people working in the [Vatican]. As Drucker pointed out, if the same ratio were applied to our government in Washington, D.C., there would be 500 federal employees working in the capital, as opposed to roughly 500,000.

By the way, since you are critical of the Vatican, are you also critical of the Temple of Solomon? By all accounts, the Temple of Solomon makes the Vatican look like the poor house. Should the Israelites not have built the Temple of Solomon? Should they have used all the resources that went into it to feed the poor instead?
 
its not that simple. wealth serves as incentives for people to work hard. the desire for wealth creates jobs. and the presence of wealth fuels creativity. its wrong to just dismiss wealthy people as like camels trying to enter the eye of a needle. like what you said, wealthy people have their own set of temptations. but there is no reason to believe that the challenges they encounter make them more wicked than the average guy.
Agnos, I get it, you embrace capitalism and all its promises. The ends justify the means and all of that. But with respect, don’t be surprised if serious Christians find your arguments less than compelling. Believe it or not, there are other sources of motivation in this world. The craftsmen of the Middle Ages created the great Cathedrals with little more incentive than the hope that there work would be pleasing to God.

The pursuit of wealth for its own sake is fundamentally at odds with the Christian message. If you don’t like it, that is fine, but don’t try to convince me otherwise because it is clear from the Gospel that we are called for a higher calling.

Mind you, I am not saying that getting rich is bad, but getting rich simply to be rich is.
Like my wife, and her friends. When their medical tools company went to mexico. They found other jobs rather quickly. Some invested in education and became accountants. My wife became a computer technician. And the west is still wealthy.
So I am just curious, if I am right, and God asks you why you supported outsourcing and all of this at the final judgement, are you just going to say “the west is still wealthy”? Let me repeat, I care not the slightest about the total result if the result was achieved by hurting others as the means of achieving that result. The ends do not and cannot justify the means. The fact that your wife and others in your area were able to find new jobs is great. But others in other areas have not been so lucky. And even if they have been, it hardly justifies the suffering that loosing a job brings.
are you saying that outsourcing permanently raises the unemployment rate? because if it doesnt, then you have no point.
I think you missed my point. Christianity is not about statistics. In this context, it is how we as individuals treat our neighbors. As a Christian, I cannot justify harming a single innocent person, even transiently, by stating that 100 or 1000 or a billion will benefit as a result.

Capitalism is a form of materialism, and materialism is the idol of the 20th and 21st century. Yes, it has been remarkably successful at increasing our material wealth, but has it been at the cost of our souls?


Bill
 
how can you tell when the rich begins to classify as ‘filthy rich’?
I think you should read the actual statement from the vatican before you start using misquotes from others in this thread concerning “filthy” or “obscenely rich” persons.

This is why most people misunderstand catholic teaching, because they didn’t read the actual teaching first, only what others have said the church teaches.
 
The ends do not and cannot justify the means.
my friend, that phrase only applies if the ‘means’ used classifies as atrocities. otherwise its ok, like if you have to make a little white lie to save your own life from murderers. right? :rolleyes:
Agnos, I get it, you embrace capitalism and all its promises. The ends justify the means and all of that.
that means arent really that bad. its less than perfect.
Believe it or not, there are other sources of motivation in this world. The craftsmen of the Middle Ages created the great Cathedrals with little more incentive than the hope that there work would be pleasing to God.
oh i do believe it. but man does not live by the word of god alone.
Mind you, I am not saying that getting rich is bad, but getting rich simply to be rich is.
believe me, we both agree here.
So I am just curious, if I am right, and God asks you why you supported outsourcing and all of this at the final judgement, are you just going to say “the west is still wealthy”? Let me repeat, I care not the slightest about the total result if the result was achieved by hurting others as the means of achieving that result.
I will say “*God, outsourcing helped improve the global economy. Being hurt a little is an integral part of growing up. It makes us wiser & more resilient. No pain, no gain. 🤷 *.” And with that, God gives me a pat of reasssurance, and tells me “Thats my boy”.
The fact that your wife and others in your area were able to find new jobs is great. But others in other areas have not been so lucky. And even if they have been, it hardly justifies the suffering that loosing a job brings.
Of course they have been able to find new jobs. Employers are completely justified in moving their business. And it benefitted the mexicans who need more dough than americans. No sin is committed here.
Capitalism is a form of materialism, and materialism is the idol of the 20th and 21st century. Yes, it has been remarkably successful at increasing our material wealth, but has it been at the cost of our souls?
Man had always been materialistic. But the demise of religion today is the due to the failures of your clergies (catholic, muslim, protestants, etc. all failing together) throughout history. Skeletons being spilled from religious closets thanks to the modern dissemination of knowledge. Thats whats really been costing souls. the improving economy has very …verrry little to do with it.

You are barking at the wrong tree.
 
my friend, that phrase only applies if the ‘means’ used classifies as atrocities. otherwise its ok, like if you have to make a little white lie to save your own life from murderers. right? :rolleyes:
Actually, no. The Church has taught that any lie is morally wrong and can’t be justified. It might be excused, but it can’t be justified.

And who defines an atrocity? You might say that murder is an atrocity while another might say killing 100 is. I say treating humans as disposable commodities are.
that means arent really that bad. its less than perfect.
Why do I think that all evils are justified that way?
oh i do believe it. but man does not live by the word of god alone.
No, it also lives by the Body and Blood of Jesus. But I would not want to try to live with out the word of God.
I will say “*God, outsourcing helped improve the global economy. Being hurt a little is an integral part of growing up. It makes us wiser & more resilient. No pain, no gain. 🤷 *.” And with that, God gives me a pat of reasssurance, and tells me “Thats my boy”.
My goodness, have you not considered the fact that you might be wrong at all? Pain may be part of growing up, but that doesn’t mean inflicting it is legitimate. Remember, Jesus’s Crucifixtion was necessary to our salvation, but those who crucified him still sinned.
Of course they have been able to find new jobs. Employers are completely justified in moving their business. And it benefitted the mexicans who need more dough than americans. No sin is committed here.
I honestly think that while your wife might have experienced outsourcing, that you yourself, have never lived in an area where outsourcing basically stripped the local economy of its major industry. In many cases, when jobs have gone over seas, the workers in America who lost the jobs have never been able to recover the income level they had before their jobs moved. And I wouldn’t tell someone whose $15/hour job was outsourced that the Mexicans need the money more than they do.
Man had always been materialistic. But the demise of religion today is the due to the failures of your clergies (catholic, muslim, protestants, etc. all failing together
) throughout history. Skeletons being spilled from religious closets. Thats whats really been costing souls. the improving economy has very …verrry little to do with it.

You are barking at the wrong tree.

If you think that prosperity and a fall of off belief is not related, then I think you really have not looked at the world properly. The richer a country gets, the more that science and medicine promise, the less likely people are to be religious. They are trading their souls for happiness here.


Bill
 
perhaps if there are statistics which supports your assertions. on the contrary stats show that poorer places have higher crime rates. slum areas. the third world. you name it.
Jesus said. If anyone causes theses little ones to sin it would be better if they had a stone around their neck and tossed into the sea. We are all God’s little ones…his children.

They are poor in the basic needs to substain life. Food, shelter, clothing, poor agriculture etc. So they steal just to survive out of their needs to feed their children. We are to serve them to give out of our abundance. Jesus walk among the poor, rejected, ate with them and stayed with them. Remember those who are first will be last. Those who are last will be first.

The rich are here to save the poor and in the end the poor will save the rich! I have ponder hard on this statement made by Mother Teresa. We all have a purpose even the poor. I was thirsty you gave me something to drink. I was in prison you came and visited me. I was hungry you gave me food.

God Bless

God Bless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top