Vatican directs bishops to keep parish records from Mormons

  • Thread starter Thread starter UtahMaggie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LDS baptisms are invalid and irrelevant to Catholics, so I’m not sure what the main concern is.

Besides, many Catholics are interested in their family genealogy, and some very popular genealogy software and websites were either developed by, or hosted by LDS stitutions. If the LDS gets a hold of parishioner personal information, it won’t necessarily be from the parishes.
 
I have a friend that is 81 years old and LDS. Her grandmother was one of eight wives. I asked her abou the baptism after death because she has a granddaughter that does a stand in for the dead people the LDS think they are baptizing.
I asked her what she thought the dead people think when they find they are being baptized. Just how are they notified??
(I did say, what do they do send them a telegram by a seagull?)
She said they know about it and they can decide if they want to change or not.!!! So, I said, ok, but if they say get outta here, how does the LDS church know that because they all show up as being rebaptized??
She really didn’t know how to answer that.
Did tell her not to even think about doing it to me, or there would be a return to sender telegram from me.
Strange.
 
No, no, a thousand times no. Bad decision.

I’ve been doing genealogy for more than 30 years, and the LDS records are vital. Other than that then each country ought to have a central repository of Catholic sacramental records that are over 72 years old open to public scrutiny, at least for family history purposes.

I have always found it weird for Mormons that God was powerful enough that He could retroactively baptize people, but that Mormons had to do the research so that the Lord could know whom to baptize. Goofy.

John
 
It’s presumptuous, offensive, and disrespectful of the Mormon religion to expect the Roman Catholic Church, or any other religious body (or anyone, for that matter) to provide them with the names of our faithful departed, so the Mormon religion can perform their own rituals.

It’s true they will get the names through public databases, but there is no reason for the RCC (or anyone else) to passively aid them in a practice which not only goes against our own beliefs, but is deceptive in nature.

And, as I already mentioned, it’s also dishonest of the Mormons when they don’t admit their intentions on their genealogy websites. The reason they don’t practice full disclosure is pretty obvious. People would balk at giving them information.

As a side note: The Mormons have closed off the database which holds the names of those whom the Mormons have already performed posthumous rituals on. It’s only open to Mormons, now.

Consequently, there is no way for non-Mormons to find out if these rituals have been performed, using the names of our family members. Even if we know these rituals have taken place (as I do with my family members), we can’t get the records to have the names removed. Their claim is we’re not entitled to them. They closed the database about a year or so ago.

So, their complaints of singling out Mormons for unfair treatment and their cries of discrimination are pretty darned hypocritical, IMO.
 


Consequently, there is no way for non-Mormons to find out if these rituals have been performed, using the names of our family members. Even if we know these rituals have taken place (as I do with my family members), we can’t get the records to have the names removed. Their claim is we’re not entitled to them. They closed the database about a year or so ago.

So, their complaints of singling out Mormons for unfair treatment and their cries of discrimination are pretty darned hypocritical, IMO.
👍
One of the best serious points in this thread made so far. In some ways that type of mentality kind of mirrors the remark :“When speaking ex cathedra the pope is not infallible (…but I am).” 🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top