Vatican thanks Muslims for returning God to Europe

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlanF
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lest we flip out over the word, it is the Arabic word for God and is as legitimate to use as the English word “God” for Arabic speakers. In fact I believe either the Syrian or Maronite Rites use it already.
i don’t think you should assume we are so backwards that we don’t realize Allah is the arabic word for God, however, Allah is the name of their God not mine. Allah of the Koran is not equal to the God of the Holy Bible in my opinion.
 
i don’t think you should assume we are so backwards that we don’t realize Allah is the arabic word for God,
I didn’t, so take your own advice and not assume before you are critical of others.
 
Has anyone noticed, past all the emotion, that the title of the article is not reflective of what was said? This is an example of much ado about nothing, or at least the wrong thing. The Vatican did not thank Muslims. This sort of tabloid style yellow journalism is how urban legends grow. I have noticed that it is rampant in the British press. What was said:
Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, head of the Catholic Church’s department for interfaith contacts, said religion was now talked and written about more than ever before in today’s Europe.
‘It’s thanks to the Muslims,’ he said in a speech printed in Friday’s L’Osservatore Romano, the official daily of the Vatican.
‘Muslims, having become a significant minority in Europe, were the ones who demanded space for God in society.’
The phrase is not a praise of Muslims, or thanking them in any sense of the word. It is nothing but an acknowledgement that the influx of Islam has dampened secularization. This is nothing but a simple acknowledgement of fact, or what is perceived as a fact.

Most assuredly the practice of assuming is rampant on both sides of the pond. Perhaps we should just take the Cardinal at face value and not follow the media lead of jumping to conclusions.
 
Lest we flip out over the word, it is the Arabic word for God and is as legitimate to use as the English word “God” for Arabic speakers. In fact I believe either the Syrian or Maronite Rites use it already.
Yes, “Allah” is the word that Arab Christians use for “God,” after it became the de rigeur word for “God” during the spread of Islam. What we don’t know is the word that Arab Christians used for “God” before the spread of Islam. And that doesn’t change the fact that Islam’s Allah is not the same as the Judeo-Christian God.

DaveBj
 
Has anyone noticed, past all the emotion, that the title of the article is not reflective of what was said? This is an example of much ado about nothing, or at least the wrong thing. The Vatican did not thank Muslims. This sort of tabloid style yellow journalism is how urban legends grow. I have noticed that it is rampant in the British press. What was said:

The phrase is not a praise of Muslims, or thanking them in any sense of the word. It is nothing but an acknowledgement that the influx of Islam has dampened secularization. This is nothing but a simple acknowledgement of fact, or what is perceived as a fact.

Most assuredly the practice of assuming is rampant on both sides of the pond. Perhaps we should just take the Cardinal at face value and not follow the media lead of jumping to conclusions.
Go to my previous post and you will see that I mentioned this fact.😃
 
Go to my previous post and you will see that I mentioned this fact.😃
So I see. I was a little slow on the uptake.

I surely do not criticize anyone that posted negatively about this statement. I went on and one before I realized the whole thread is a strawman.
 
The sad thing about this entire story is that its the Muslims who are getting this stuff done there. Why aren’t we?
 
The sad thing about this entire story is that its the Muslims who are getting this stuff done there. Why aren’t we?
The Muslims are creating an awakening for many Christians when the Christians see that their freedom of religion could be lost. The thing I find sad is that the Christians needed this wake up call.
 
Why do you find this unbelievable? Muslims are our spiritual cousins and we have a lot of common interests.
They whole “wrong God” idea should be, has been, its own thread in NonCatholic Religions. I always thought there was only one God.
There is only one God, but the Muslims are not worshipping him. The true God sent his only son to die for all our sins so that we may be baptised in him and redeemed. The Muslims deny this.
That arguement could also be extended to other religions; are pagans, who worship Thor and Odin &c. worshiping the same god as us. NO! They (mostly) expressly deny the existance of the christian God. The Muslims are the same, the false prophet Mohammed was sent by Satan to keep people away from Christ, who was of course the greatest ever triumph against Satan. They are definately not our spiritual cousins. More Islam in our society is still a dilution of Christianity.

I don’t know what the conclusion was of those threads but that’s my opinion.
 
**3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.

Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom**

NOSTRA AETATE
PROCLAIMED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI ON OCTOBER 28, 1965

vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

It seems that Catholic theology accepts the God of Islam, the God of Israel and the God of Jesus Christ as the same God. She sees in Islam the same understanding of God as we have, with the exception of the Trinity. But the Jews don’t share our belief in the Trinity either. We accept that the God of Israel is the same God as the God of Jesus Christ.

Nostra Aetate has never been revoked. In fact, Pope Benedict refers to it frequently.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.

Since in the course of centuries not a few quarrels and hostilities have arisen between Christians and Moslems, this sacred synod urges all to forget the past and to work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom

NOSTRA AETATE
PROCLAIMED BY HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI ON OCTOBER 28, 1965

vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

It seems that Catholic theology accepts the God of Islam, the God of Israel and the God of Jesus Christ as the same God. She sees in Islam the same understanding of God as we have, with the exception of the Trinity. But the Jews don’t share our belief in the Trinity either. We accept that the God of Israel is the same God as the God of Jesus Christ.

Nostra Aetate has never been revoked. In fact, Pope Benedict refers to it frequently.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
If they deny the trinity then no, they do not have the same understanding of God at all. They might worship in essence God the Father but they ignore Christ who is nesseccary for salvation. They are still heretics who follow false prophets or obsolete covenants. Mutual understanding means peace which is good but it does not mean an acceptance that Islam is correct or that without Jesus Christ the muslims can be redeemed and saved.

We can have understanding but they are not our spiritual brethren.
 
If they deny the trinity then no, they do not have the same understanding of God at all. They might worship in essence God the Father but they ignore Christ who is nesseccary for salvation. They are still heretics who follow false prophets or obsolete covenants. Mutual understanding means peace which is good but it does not mean an acceptance that Islam is correct or that without Jesus Christ the muslims can be redeemed and saved.

We can have understanding but they are not our spiritual brethren.
But wait a minute. If you read Nostra Aetate carefully and you read Ut Unum Sint and also what Popes John Paul and Benedict have said about the Muslims and Jews, they do worship the One True God. They do not have an understanding of the Trinity as we do. This is true. But neither the Muslims or the Jews are heretics. They cannot be heretics, because they were never Catholic. Only a person who leaves the Catholic Church to follow a false doctrine is a heretic.

As to the person of Jesus Christ, we do believe that he is necessary for salvation. But Pope John Paul II made it very clear that Jesus uses any means to save and that he can use other faiths to save those who are not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they live according to their conscience and follow those elements of the Truth that can be found in their faith. This was clarified in Ut Unum Sint.

Otherwise, the Church would have to condemn Jews as well and we do not. We acknoledge that they are our older brothers and sisters in the faith.

Also, notice that Nostra Aetate pulls out those positive elements of Islam and puts them out there for Catholics to appreciate. They do accept the God of Abraham, which is the same God as the God of Israel and Jesus Christ.

They do honour Jesus, even though they do not believe that he’s the Messiah. The Church appreciates this and sees this as a possible means of grace and some future conversion. They do honour and invoke the Blessed Mother and believe in the virginity of Mary, which is a Catholic dogma.

It is pretty clear that Nostra Aetate is trying to show Catholics that there are some elements of Truth is Islam, though there is still much more to go, thus the need for further dialogue and cooperation.

Based on this understanding of Islam is that the statement was made about them bringing God back into the public eye in Europe and why the Vatican said that "thanks to the Muslims, " this has happened. The God of the Muslims is also our God.

As to whether they are our spiritual brothers, that has already been decided by the Church that all of us are of one spiritual family. It is true that the Jews our our older brothers and sisters in the faith. It is also true that Islam relies heavily on the Covenant with Abraham, which is not obsolete. The Church teaches us about a New Covenant through Jesus Christ, but his new Covenant includes all of the many covenants that God made with Israel. Jesus came to fulfill the law, not to abolish it. The Covenant with Abraham is fulfilled in Christ. This was stated by Pope Benedict when he was Cardinal Ratzinger. The Covenant that God made with Abraham is included in the Church’s Covenant with Christ. Whether that makes the Muslims brothers or cousins, is almost irrelevant.

It makes them one of the three faiths who believe in the one true God. That’s very significant, because it gives us something in common from which to work forward toward conversion and union. What Catholics, Jews and Muslims are called to do is to begin with their common faith in the God-Head. Then we can work from there. Antagonism toward each other will never bring conversion.

Hope this helps.

JR 🙂
 
What is this talk of “unity”?
There can be no unity between Christianity and Islam, we follow Christ, they follow the false prophet Mohammed. We’ll call them infidels if heretic’s technically wrong.

The Old Covenant is obsolete even if the new one builds on it, it’s been updated, like an old obsolete mobile phone model.

I accept that they worship in essence the one true Creator, but very falsly, they deny Christ and the Trinity and only know God through the lies of a satanically inspired false prophet. The Church has always taught that one needs Christ for salvation, I don’t believe Ut Unum Sint says muslims can be saved by Islam. It preaches mutual understanding but they can’t be redeemed like Christians.

Alan:)
 
What is this talk of “unity”?
There can be no unity between Christianity and Islam, we follow Christ, they follow the false prophet Mohammed. We’ll call them infidels if heretic’s technically wrong.

The Old Covenant is obsolete even if the new one builds on it, it’s been updated, like an old obsolete mobile phone model.

I accept that they worship in essence the one true Creator, but very falsly, they deny Christ and the Trinity and only know God through the lies of a satanically inspired false prophet. The Church has always taught that one needs Christ for salvation, I don’t believe Ut Unum Sint says muslims can be saved by Islam. It preaches mutual understanding but they can’t be redeemed like Christians.

Alan:)
But wait a minute. Judaism does not acknowledge the Messiahship of Jesus either. I notice that you are not saying anything about that. Judaism has a very big problem with the Christian theology of the Trinity, because the God of Abraham revealed himself as One. They see the Trinity as dividing the God-Head. But we don’t accuse them of worshipping God wrongly.

Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI have made it a point to acknowlege Jewish holy days. Remember that Pope Benedict asked to visit the synagogue in New York, because he wanted to wish the Jewish community a Happy and Holy Passover. Every year, the Holy Father, sin John XXIII have made it a point to visit the major synagogue in Rome to pray.

Also, all the Popes from John XXIII to Benedict XVI have expressed high hopes for unity between Christians, Muslims and Jews. All believe that God does speak to them in some transcendent way that is beyond our comprehension. The Church does pray for the conversion of Muslims and Jews every Good Friday. Therefore, the Church believes that unity is possible.

It has never been the official position of the Catholic Church that Mohammed was diabolical. He was in error. That is the position of the Church. That he was diabolical is your personal opinion and you may express that, as long as you qualify that it is your opinion, not that of the Catholic Church.

You must also state that the position of the Catholic Church is that Jesus can save those who are not Catholic.

All salvation comes through Jesus. That is the position of the Church. The fullness of truth subsists in the Catholic Church. That is also the position of the Church. There are elements of truth that subsist in other faith communities. That is also the position of the Church. Jesus uses those elements to save, that is also the position of the Church clearly expressed in Ut Unum Sint and the Declaration on Ecumenism.

It is also the position of the Church that Catholics are not to express themselves in a negative or derrogatory manner or express anything that is offensive to members of other faiths. Benedict XVI made this clear when he met with the Muslims, three times now. He has expressed more than once that the Catholic Church (you and me) hold the Muslims and Jews in special esteem as brothers and sisters.

We have to be careful to make sure that the reaer knows what is our opinion and what the Holy See has said on an issue. You are free to express your disagreement as long as it is known that it is your opinion vs the opinion and hopes of the current Pope.

This is important, because others may think that this is what the Church is saying, which is not. Currently, the papacy is speaking very postively about Islam and very strongly against acts of violence and terrorism. She separates faith from sin. We want to ensure that new Catholics or non Catholics understand what the Holy See is saying and thinking, especially when it differs from what we say and think.

On Sep 12, 2008, in a meetin with public officials in France and several Muslim leaders the Pope Benedict XVI said **“I thank the delegates of the French Islamic community for having accepted the invitation to participate in this meeting: I convey to them my best wishes for the holy season of Ramadan already underway.” **

Notice that the Holy Father calls the season of Ramadan “holy”. Benedict is not a dumb man. He is an excellent theologian. If he calls Ramadan holy, it is because he sees some theological truth in it.

He also recognizes the on-going validity of the Covenant with Abraham in the same statement. He said, "By her very nature the Catholic Church feels obliged to respect the Covenant made by the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob."

We are obliged to respect the Covenant. That rules out discarding it as not important or no longer efficacious.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
But wait a minute. Judaism does not acknowledge the Messiahship of Jesus either. I notice that you are not saying anything about that. Judaism has a very big problem with the Christian theology of the Trinity, because the God of Abraham revealed himself as One. They see the Trinity as dividing the God-Head. But we don’t accuse them of worshipping God wrongly.

Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI have made it a point to acknowlege Jewish holy days. Remember that Pope Benedict asked to visit the synagogue in New York, because he wanted to wish the Jewish community a Happy and Holy Passover. Every year, the Holy Father, sin John XXIII have made it a point to visit the major synagogue in Rome to pray.
Of course the Jews worship God wrongly, they reject Jesus as Christ, the one redeemer of our souls. Praying in a synagogue does not legitimise their religion, God is everywhere, one can pray anywhere. wishing them a happy Pasover also does not legitimise their religion, that’s just friendliness.
Also, all the Popes from John XXIII to Benedict XVI have expressed high hopes for unity between Christians, Muslims and Jews. All believe that God does speak to them in some transcendent way that is beyond our comprehension. The Church does pray for the conversion of Muslims and Jews every Good Friday. Therefore, the Church believes that unity is possible.
It depends on what you mean by unity. Unity by conversion to Christ, as you allude to in the final sentnce, is of course possible and desirable. But simply “unity”, as in trying to unify our different religions is false and cannot work. Pope Benedict XVI has said this very recently.
It has never been the official position of the Catholic Church that Mohammed was diabolical. He was in error. That is the position of the Church. That he was diabolical is your personal opinion and you may express that, as long as you qualify that it is your opinion, not that of the Catholic Church.
Indeed, but the Chrch hs not said he is not diabolical. In my opinion (there you are), the Holy Spirit would and could not guide someone to propogate a faith that explicitly denies Jesus Christ as lord and saviour. Mohammad seemed adamant that he was getting revelations, they had to be comming from somewhere.
You must also state that the position of the Catholic Church is that Jesus can save those who are not Catholic.

All salvation comes through Jesus. That is the position of the Church. The fullness of truth subsists in the Catholic Church. That is also the position of the Church. There are elements of truth that subsist in other faith communities. That is also the position of the Church. Jesus uses those elements to save, that is also the position of the Church clearly expressed in Ut Unum Sint and the Declaration on Ecumenism.
It is the official position of the Church that all salvation comes from Jesus through the Church. People outside the Church may only be saved in a state of invincible ignorance, this is also the position of the Church. Non-christians must has absolutely no knowledge of Christ as saviour to be saved. A non-catholic must likewise have no knowledge that the Catholic Church is that which was founded by Christ upon St. Peter to be saved.
It is also the position of the Church that Catholics are not to express themselves in a negative or derrogatory manner or express anything that is offensive to members of other faiths. Benedict XVI made this clear when he met with the Muslims, three times now. He has expressed more than once that the Catholic Church (you and me) hold the Muslims and Jews in special esteem as brothers and sisters.
Holding them in specieal esteem as brothers and sisters is not the same as saying nothing that would offend them. I’m quite sure that calling Mohammad a false prophet would offend the muslims, but the Church doesn’t teach that we mustn’t say this, because it’s true. In holding them in high esteem, IMO, we must to the mosty charitable thing and evangelise to them the Gospel of Christ, since there will be very few muslims or Jews who have invincible ignorance of Christ.

BTW, withi a year of being elected as Pope, Benedict XVI had the muslims burning straw effigies of him for essentually calling Islam a violent religion, so it is definatly not the position of the Church that catholic must not express anything that would offend other faiths.
We have to be careful to make sure that the reader knows what is our opinion and what the Holy See has said on an issue. You are free to express your disagreement as long as it is known that it is your opinion vs the opinion and hopes of the current Pope.

This is important, because others may think that this is what the Church is saying, which is not. Currently, the papacy is speaking very postively about Islam and very strongly against acts of violence and terrorism. She separates faith from sin. We want to ensure that new Catholics or non Catholics understand what the Holy See is saying and thinking, especially when it differs from what we say and think.
As I have shown, I do not believe my position to be opposed to that of the Pope, and I’m not supporting acts of terrorism. :eek:

Cont…
 
…inued
On Sep 12, 2008, in a meetin with public officials in France and several Muslim leaders the Pope Benedict XVI said **“I thank the delegates of the French Islamic community for having accepted the invitation to participate in this meeting: I convey to them my best wishes for the holy season of Ramadan **already underway.”

Notice that the Holy Father calls the season of Ramadan “holy”. Benedict is not a dumb man. He is an excellent theologian. If he calls Ramadan holy, it is because he sees some theological truth in it.
One of the definitions givin in my dictionary for “holy” is: “dedicated to God or a religious purpose” (Oxford Concise English Dictionary), therefore it can be described as holy, sacrificing a child to Imhotep is technically holy.

I think also he want to try to make peace with the muslims, it’s still quite soo after the said effigy burning.
He also recognizes the on-going validity of the Covenant with Abraham in the same statement. He said, **“By her very nature the Catholic Church feels obliged to respect **the Covenant made by the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.”

We are obliged to respect the Covenant. That rules out discarding it as not important or no longer efficacious.
The ongoing validity of the old covenant is embodied in the new covenant, which is the fulfillment of the old. Certain bits of the old covenant, like eating pork or mixed fibres, have been declared nonsense by Jesus. so the Old Covenant, by itself as it was before Jesus, s the Jews practice it, is made obsolete. Circumcision has been replaced by the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins etc.
Fraternally,

JR 🙂
God bless,

Alan.
 
if someone comes up with a religion that is not exactly catholic. That makes it Satan? That sounds crazy. Humans are inherently flawed. You don’t need Satan to make a mistake. People used to think the Earth was flat. Was that Satan’s doing too? I think not. Before the bases of faith were laid out, before official Judaism. People worshipped God in the best ways they could. The complex ideas about how God SHOULD be worshipped had not been established. The three major religions of the Holy land have the most in common. They are all convinced they are right and they all are in one way or another. But calling out Satan isn’t helping anything. Especially if the followers are making an effort to obey God the best they know how. The world is full of faiths much older than Christianity. What motivation will they have to convert considering theirs is older and they view Christianity as either a cult or pop religion. Zoroastaism is a good example of this. The Persions of Iran were monotheisitic long before Islam was brought into their country by the cultural revolution. Now Iran is labeled as a muslim country, but the people there still worship in their old ways and are deeply religious. I wouldn’t call it Satanic though. The Greek philosophers had Ideas about one god and Salvation as well. But unless you are concretely exposed to Catholic Christianity, you’re going to miss alot of stuff. Calling this ignorance Satanic, is like calling you Satanic for not knowing Algebra at five even though you knew all the basic arithmatic.
It’s better to belive in some god than no god at all. Otherwise you think you’e the hottest thing in the universe. It’s a matter of humility. And yes I do believe a bhuddist can go to heaven. It’s Silly to think they can’t. God grades us on our own ability to do what is good. It wouldn’t be fair to compare a boy raised in a monastery with a boy raised in the streets with little understanding of any faith. Now apostasy is an entirely diiferent thing altogether. But this isn’t the arguement is it?
 
Of course the Jews worship God wrongly, they reject Jesus as Christ, the one redeemer of our souls. Praying in a synagogue does not legitimise their religion, God is everywhere, one can pray anywhere. wishing them a happy Pasover also does not legitimise their religion, that’s just friendliness.

It depends on what you mean by unity. Unity by conversion to Christ, as you allude to in the final sentnce, is of course possible and desirable. But simply “unity”, as in trying to unify our different religions is false and cannot work. Pope Benedict XVI has said this very recently.

Indeed, but the Chrch hs not said he is not diabolical. In my opinion (there you are), the Holy Spirit would and could not guide someone to propogate a faith that explicitly denies Jesus Christ as lord and saviour. Mohammad seemed adamant that he was getting revelations, they had to be comming from somewhere.

It is the official position of the Church that all salvation comes from Jesus through the Church. People outside the Church may only be saved in a state of invincible ignorance, this is also the position of the Church. Non-christians must has absolutely no knowledge of Christ as saviour to be saved. A non-catholic must likewise have no knowledge that the Catholic Church is that which was founded by Christ upon St. Peter to be saved.

Holding them in specieal esteem as brothers and sisters is not the same as saying nothing that would offend them. I’m quite sure that calling Mohammad a false prophet would offend the muslims, but the Church doesn’t teach that we mustn’t say this, because it’s true. In holding them in high esteem, IMO, we must to the mosty charitable thing and evangelise to them the Gospel of Christ, since there will be very few muslims or Jews who have invincible ignorance of Christ.

BTW, withi a year of being elected as Pope, Benedict XVI had the muslims burning straw effigies of him for essentually calling Islam a violent religion, so it is definatly not the position of the Church that catholic must not express anything that would offend other faiths.

As I have shown, I do not believe my position to be opposed to that of the Pope, and I’m not supporting acts of terrorism. :eek:

Cont…
I would strongly suggest that you read some theological works on ecclesiaology, including those of Bonaventure, Robert Bellarmine, Therese of Liseux, Mother Teresa, John XXIII, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. You may get a better grasp of how the Church views salvation for those outside of the Catholic faith.

Good luck to you.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top