dennisknapp:
There have been a few posts in which you make the claim that I, and others who hold my position, think we are better than you. Why do you keep saying this?
I’ve said so many things to so many people the past few days, and like I once said I am generalizing so if the shoe doesn’t fit, don’t wear it.
If someone truly believes he/she is in full communion with Catholic beliefs, then that’s fabulous. If they tell me that I am a marginal Catholic, a cafeteria Catholic, or that I should leave the Church because I am hurting her, then they are in fact telling me I don’t belong. Even if they think I’m the a-hole, I am still part of the body whom the Spirit has placed exactly where He wants. The attitude that I am maybe not good enough to be in the exclusive club they are in is what I’m talking about.
Of course, it is in my perception that I recognize this alleged slight which may not have been consciously conveyed at all – or may even be absent from the person’s heart. What I’m trying to do, actually, is awaken those who are trying to “help” people like me to give them some glimpse of why their methods incite arguments rather than conversions. They may not intend to deride anyone, but their words are loaded either because of what’s deep in their heart or because they latch onto others’ words and throw them around recklessly.
Again, if I falsely attributed any of these characteristics to you I apologize.
When is fidelity equated with arrogance and pride? Why is standing for the truth equated with looking down on people?
Nothing wrong with fidelity. Fidelity is good. When you (again using “you” collectively) stand on a pedestal and proclaim your fidelity, and tell us down here on ground level we are lost, that’s looking down at people. In particular, when you divide Catholics into “obedient Catholics” and “cafeteria Catholics” then you are dividing the Body of Christ. I know, some people think they are just trimming the fat.
If you have interpretated what I have said in this manner then you have misunderstood me.
It wouldn’t surprise me. I’ve misunderstood things before, and sometimes spoken without first gaining full understanding!
Also, saying such things diverts from the real issue and borders on the logical fallacy known as ad hominem or character assassination. You are basically saying I am mean for holding the position I do. This has no bearing on the issue at hand.
Did you not suggest that people who do not believe all things the Church teaches should leave the Church? Did you not say that my sin, if I don’t believe the Church, is great in comparison to homosexuality?
You have told me, in essence, that because I have problems with certain highly technical Church teachings that probably didn’t even exist in the time of Jesus, that I am in worse shape than if I were gay.
No, you aren’t being mean to me, if you intended it just to “inform” me for my own good. Suggesting that I am a worse sinner than if I were a homosexual, and that I should leave the Church, is hard to take without at least wondering whether you are speaking in anger or intolerance toward me.
If you are not mean, then you need to learn how to have a discussion about serious issues without telling a person they are not good enough to be members of the same Church as you, and inferring that they are the worse sinners there are.
On a side note, you should meet our new bishop Jackel (spelling? the name sounds like JAYkel) we finally got after Bishop Olmsted left our diocese. He actually was a Buddhist for two years after he left his parents, but then came back to the Church and is now a bishop. I’ve heard him preach twice now, once at my child’s Confirmation, and he is incredible. He is a spirit filled speaker who was so real that he totally impressed both kids and adults, both CCs and orthodox. Woo Hoo! We were afraid nobody could ever measure up to Olmsted, but this guy seems really great!
I told that story to emphasize that people change in their spiritual journey. Today’s heretics can be tomorrow’s St. Pauls.
Alan