As far as I know Archbishop Vigano has not said that the present occupier of the Holy See is not truly the pope but I have heard him say quite the opposite and speak of Pope Francis as the Pope.Sedevacantism is the position held by some people who identify as Catholic that the present occupier of the Holy See is not truly the pope.
What did I say that wasn’t true?
Why did he call for Pope Francis to resign if he thought he was the valid Pope? Why doesn’t he refer to Pope Francis as the Pope anymore? He calls him Bergoglio. Pope John Paul II oversaw the biggest sedevacantist movement of any Pope and that was marked by their referral to him as “Woytila”.Motherwit:![]()
As far as I know Archbishop Vigano has not said that the present occupier of the Holy See is not truly the pope but I have heard him say quite the opposite and speak of Pope Francis as the Pope.Sedevacantism is the position held by some people who identify as Catholic that the present occupier of the Holy See is not truly the pope.
What did I say that wasn’t true?
I don’t think he would need to resign if he was not the pope, so asking him to resign shows he knows he is the pope. You can’t resign from something you are not.Why did he call for Pope Francis to resign if he thought he was the valid Pope?
I am assuming you are like me and live in the United States but apparently in Europe it is common to call a pope by their surname:Is that a new thing to refer to Pope’s by their birth surname now? I’ve never done it and never will.
This sounds a bit illogical to me. Why call for a resignation if a person doesnt believe the person is a valid Pope?Why did he call for Pope Francis to resign if he thought he was the valid Pope?
Motherwit, I would love an answer to my query, what is the reasoning behind something like that.Anyway, I’ve heard enough to detect cafeteria Catholicism and how ingrained it is so I’ll bow out of this now.
In my 60 odd years of practicing Catholicism, I’ve never heard a faithful Catholic refer to a Pope by their last name sans any semblence of their clerical position other than sede’s and cafeteria Catholics who don’t like what the Pope taught. Everyone else in my experience treats the current Pope with due respect referring to them by their office. It’s as simple as that. An experience thing.Motherwit:![]()
Motherwit, I would love an answer to my query, what is the reasoning behind something like that.Anyway, I’ve heard enough to detect cafeteria Catholicism and how ingrained it is so I’ll bow out of this now.
Fair enough. I can see how that would be read. I will say I read unfavourable sentiment against the Pope and downright disrespect for him quite regularily on this forum, across all sub forums. These people would not be classed as cafeteria catholics, some come across as very pious. Its a mystery.In my 60 odd years of practicing Catholicism, I’ve never heard a faithful Catholic refer to a Pope by their last name sans any semblence of their clerical position other than sede’s and cafeteria Catholics who don’t like what the Pope taught. Everyone else in my experience treats the current Pope with due respect referring to them by their office. It’s as simple as that. An experience thing.
As I said I think it is a European thing. Not sure if you read the article by Jimmy Akin I linked but it is apparently quite common there. Not so much here in the U.S. Is happening more often.In my 60 odd years of practicing Catholicism, I’ve never heard a faithful Catholic refer to a Pope by their last name sans any semblence of their clerical position other than sede’s and cafeteria Catholics who don’t like what the Pope taught. Everyone else in my experience treats the current Pope with due respect referring to them by their office. It’s as simple as that. An experience thing.
I read it a lot on CAF from Americans. Very pious Americans.As I said I think it is a European thing. Not sure if you read the article by Jimmy Akin I linked but it is apparently quite common there. Not so much here in the U.S.
Yes, I do too, but I think it is a new happening and becoming more common. Not something that you would have heard so much in the past. Though in regards to Archbishop Vigano, which was who we were questioning about, it wouldn’t be uncommon for him.I read it a lot on CAF from Americans.
I read it and it was interesting; I didn’t know that - thanks for posting that! However, in my experience in reading many traditionalist outlets, those who refuse to say ‘Francis’ are usually doing so as intentional disrespect. For example, peruse the Remnant Newspaper (which is U.S.-based and a huge proponent of all of Archbishop Vigano’s stances) and you’ll see that the columnists and commenters regularly address Pope Francis as just ‘Bergoglio’ - without Pope in front of it, which seems to be a key element of the European usage Jimmy Akin was detailing.As I said I think it is a European thing. Not sure if you read the article by Jimmy Akin I linked but it is apparently quite common there. Not so much here in the U.S.
Yes, I do agree that there are those who do so out of disrespect,sadly, yes, though it would be difficult for us to say Archbishop Vigano meant it out of disrespect since it is common in Europe.However, in my experience in reading many traditionalist outlets, those who refuse to say ‘Francis’ are usually doing so as intentional disrespect.
From the article:Pope in front of it, which seems to be a key element of the European usage Jimmy Akin was detailing.