A
agnes_therese
Guest
It’s so very easy to criticize when we weren’t there, and don’t know all the circumstances.
If you are arguing for better Catechesis, that applies to the entire Church, and I wholeheartedly agree.But if that happened, what if they wanted to take communion and were saddened by the fact that they didn’t receive communion?
When I said that most Filipinos know the protocol well they know why they should take in the Eucharist and how sacred the Body of Christ is.
I have to make an excuse with this one, since I’ve found myself rethinking on some things. Most of the people in the Papal Mass were poor and don’t have enough education, so it’s not really their fault for being ignorant about the thing, and the way they see it, it’s a gesture of kindness and community.
Is Redemptionis Sacramentum required for Catholic schools and parishes to be taught? From what I remember that didn’t appear in any of my Christian Living lessons. And I’m Catholic school born and bred, like most Filipinos are.
thank-you for your point of view and experience. It is totally stupid to nit pick over a 7 million person Mass. Give me a brake. The Catholic faith in your country is very strong and devout and puts the cafeteria type Catholics in the west especially the US to shame. I’ve worked with a number of Filipinos and all of them have had a very strong Catholic Christian faith. Lets give it a rest.As a Filipino I have to speak out. I say we do things differently here. My Theology professor was right. This, shall I call, “stinginess” with regards to liturgy is a mainly Western thing.
And if a crowd of seven million people - faithful, reverent people I might add - would want to receive Jesus then what’s stopping them? Some of the posts in this thread who feel “abhorrent” about this sound like something out of a Pharisee. Remember when Zacchaeus wanted to listen and reach out to Jesus but can’t because it was too crowded? They are like the people in the Mass.
And besides, since that these people are passing the Eucharist to other people means that there is a sense of reverence that people would want to share that reverence to others and would want others to receive the grace of God. Isn’t that what the Church is supposed to be? The Body of Christ - a communion of people working and helping each other so everyone in it can receive the grace of Christ? I say the papal mass is a great metaphor for what the Church is supposed to be.
I trust that they are aware that they are holding the Body of Christ. Most Filipinos go to Mass, unlike in the West. They know the protocol well. Maybe the people who see this as “abhorrent” are envious of our strong faith as a people?
:clapping:It’s so very easy to criticize when we weren’t there, and don’t know all the circumstances.
Indeed, read my previous posts and I am right there with you.As a Filipino I have to speak out. I say we do things differently here. My Theology professor was right. This, shall I call, “stinginess” with regards to liturgy is a mainly Western thing.
And if a crowd of seven million people - faithful, reverent people I might add - would want to receive Jesus then what’s stopping them? Some of the posts in this thread who feel “abhorrent” about this sound like something out of a Pharisee. Remember when Zacchaeus wanted to listen and reach out to Jesus but can’t because it was too crowded? They are like the people in the Mass.
And besides, since that these people are passing the Eucharist to other people means that there is a sense of reverence that people would want to share that reverence to others and would want others to receive the grace of God. Isn’t that what the Church is supposed to be? The Body of Christ - a communion of people working and helping each other so everyone in it can receive the grace of Christ? I say the papal mass is a great metaphor for what the Church is supposed to be.
I trust that they are aware that they are holding the Body of Christ. Most Filipinos go to Mass, unlike in the West. They know the protocol well. Maybe the people who see this as “abhorrent” are envious of our strong faith as a people?
Irrelevant. As stated before, one can be disrespectful without meaning to be. I’m more angry at their shepherds that allowed this.
JoyIsLikeRain;12679481:
What would you have done if you were there?Passing Jesus around like a beach ball in my mind constitutes abuse.
Sheesh. Nobody is saying anything of the sort.
Look at some of the rules regarding the ark of the covenant. God killed people who touched the Ark. And that didn’t come close to passing Jesus like candy.
Irrelevant. As stated before, one can be disrespectful without meaning to be. I’m more angry at their shepherds that allowed this.
No one is saying it is shameful for Filipinos to receive communion. HOW it was received was shameful.
And how did you reach this conclusion?Oh no; it’s quite relevant. If it was so “irrelevant,” then you wouldn’t be so “angry” about the whole event.
Apparently not.Is Redemptionis Sacramentum required for Catholic schools and parishes to be taught?
You can’t really tell that much from Papal Masses alone. They will always draw crowds. For the low percentage of Catholics in the U.S. and FWIW, Pope John Paul II drew quite a crowd in Chicago back in 1979.thank-you for your point of view and experience. It is totally stupid to nit pick over a 7 million person Mass. Give me a brake. The Catholic faith in your country is very strong and devout and puts the cafeteria type Catholics in the west especially the US to shame.
As a Filipino I have to speak out. I say we do things differently here. My Theology professor was right. This, shall I call, “stinginess” with regards to liturgy is a mainly Western thing.
And if a crowd of seven million people - faithful, reverent people I might add - would want to receive Jesus then what’s stopping them? Some of the posts in this thread who feel “abhorrent” about this sound like something out of a Pharisee. Remember when Zacchaeus wanted to listen and reach out to Jesus but can’t because it was too crowded? They are like the people in the Mass.
And besides, since that these people are passing the Eucharist to other people means that there is a sense of reverence that people would want to share that reverence to others and would want others to receive the grace of God. Isn’t that what the Church is supposed to be? The Body of Christ - a communion of people working and helping each other so everyone in it can receive the grace of Christ? I say the papal mass is a great metaphor for what the Church is supposed to be.
I trust that they are aware that they are holding the Body of Christ. Most Filipinos go to Mass, unlike in the West. They know the protocol well. Maybe the people who see this as “abhorrent” are envious of our strong faith as a people?
You may be onto something. It seems as in the English Masses, everyone goes and goes in a methodical (and perhaps too perfunctory) manner. But in Spanish or Polish Masses, because maybe a half do not receive, you do have people literally walking over one another when approaching for communion. I have noticed that. However, in one Spanish Mass I go to, those who don’t intend to go to communion sit in back so that alleviates a lot of the traffic problems.I do sometimes wonder if it is an American thing.
That’s sort of an interesting flipside to the whole thing. Going up in a “methodical” and “perfunctory” way can lead many to receive the Eucharist by rote, which isn’t exactly reverent.You may be onto something. It seems as in the English Masses, everyone goes and goes in a methodical (and perhaps too perfunctory) manner. But in Spanish or Polish Masses, because maybe a half do not receive, you do have people literally walking over one another when approaching for communion. I have noticed that. However, in one Spanish Mass I go to, those who don’t intend to go to communion sit in back so that alleviates a lot of the traffic problems.
That’s the conclusion that I come to as I contemplate the video and the whole thread. What is the right response to the things I witness, that most properly reflects not just the nature of the Eucharist but also the relationship Christ has with these people I am observing.Yes, there will always be people who receive Communion and are not in a state of grace. And certainly we do not want to encourage people to do such a thing or imply that it is no big deal. But since I know I cannot read hearts, I try not to judge too harshly from appearances.
That’s sort of an interesting flipside to the whole thing. Going up in a “methodical” and “perfunctory” way can lead many to receive the Eucharist by rote, which isn’t exactly reverent.
With regards to the Eucharist, I often think of Jesus standing before His accusers and remaining silent. He comes to us in silence in the Eucharist. He does not shield himself from buffets and spitting. He comes to us in a completely vulnerable form, much like He came into the world as a baby.
I was making my comments about the video from the mechanical and RS aspects. I’m hardly qualified to get involved in WWJD-type arguments so I’m bowing out of further discussion on this. Proceed…That’s the conclusion that I come to as I contemplate the video and the whole thread. What is the right response to the things I witness, that most properly reflects not just the nature of the Eucharist but also the relationship Christ has with these people I am observing.
When I was abstaining from communion I would try and pick a seat near a column so that I didn’t have to get up to let anybody by. Made it easier to spend the time kneeling in prayer without having to look up every couple seconds.You may be onto something. It seems as in the English Masses, everyone goes and goes in a methodical (and perhaps too perfunctory) manner. But in Spanish or Polish Masses, because maybe a half do not receive, you do have people literally walking over one another when approaching for communion. I have noticed that. However, in one Spanish Mass I go to, those who don’t intend to go to communion sit in back so that alleviates a lot of the traffic problems.
It was viral on Facebook; the video I posted was only a repost on YouTube. It had 30k+ shares.Simply calling it a “viral video” does not make it so. It only has some 3,000+ views. If it were truly “viral”, it would have millions.
Yeah, I don’t think we need to set ourselves up as the liturgy police for papal Masses. We self-appoint ourselves to such positions at our own peril.
I was being a bit facetious.It was viral on Facebook; the video I posted was only a repost on YouTube. It had 30k+ shares.
Thank you for stating this.I have to admit, I would be very, very uncomfortable if I witnessed what was going on in the video and I am very far from a traditionalist.
SWolf;12680061:
Not let hosts fall in the mud?What would you have done if you were there?
thepinoycatholic.blogspot.com/2015/01/communion-in-hand-is-culprit.html
I have talked to some EMHCs and even nuns who were stationed at the Communion Stations. I asked them for their “experiences”.They found Hosts in the mud!If those who defend this practice call this a pastoral response and about “feelings”, then let us just throw away the Bible, the Catechism, the Code of Canon Law (which the Church wrote as a pastoral response to the pastoral needs of the Church). We’ll just all see fit what is proper and necessary based on our feelings, based on what the Spirit tells us, based on whatever tricks or creativities a bishop or priest can ever think of.