T
TheRealJuliane
Guest
Mother Theresa was one of the best Catholic evangelists ever, and she would not like that label.

Do you have a link?Today I read Cardinal-designate Dolanās address to the Holy Father and the college of cardinals on the New Evangelization. It was very inspiring. Catholic news Service has the full text of the address. I highly recommend it(for reading and reflection).
āPreach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.ā - St. Francis of Assisi
When a televangelist asked the question, āHow many people have you brought to Christ?ā my mother softly answered, āAt least six.ā We do not always know how loudly our actions speak or how many people are reached by the life they see us living. Those whom my mother brought into the Church were impressed by the ālove of our family.āCatholics evangelize by living their lives according to the faith⦠now, not all Catholics are living that life but that is, I do believe, what Catholic evangelization is supposed to look like.
If you had met me when I was Catholic, youād have wished you didnāt. I preached like the stereo type of a motor mouth Baptist.This may seem odd from someone in RCIAā¦but almost all of us are there because we married a Catholic.
I can honestly say Iāve never been approached by a Catholic for conversion.
Mormons? Yes. Born again? Yes. Chabad Lubavitch? Yes. Baptists? Yes.
Catholics? Never.
What exactly does Catholic evangelism entail and how does it differ form any of the above? or does it consist solely of marrying non-Catholics? Its definitely a fun wayā¦but perhaps not so efficient!
And why have I never heard of Catholic evangelicism?![]()
Zundrah, donāt mislead people. You were never a Catholic. You said yourself on another thread that you had had two tries at RCIA but had not gone through with it.If you had met me when I was Catholic, youād have wished you didnāt. I preached like the stereo type of a motor mouth Baptist.
RCIA doesnāt make you Catholic. It confirms you into the Church.Zundrah, donāt mislead people. You were never a Catholic. You said yourself on another thread that you had had two tries at RCIA but had not gone through with it.
Yes but whether or not you had a full understanding of the faith considering you chose not to go through with the fullness of the Sacraments remains the question. One would say the Baptism of desire would only apply to those that had the desire.RCIA doesnāt make you Catholic. It confirms you into the Church.
I had reasons I left RCIA towards the end and it was nothing to do with the teachings of the Church.Yes but whether or not you had a full understanding of the faith considering you chose not to go through with the fullness of the Sacraments remains the question. One would say the Baptism of desire would only apply to those that had the desire.
Zundrah, donāt mislead people. You were never a Catholic. You said yourself on another thread that you had had two tries at RCIA but had not gone through with it.
RCIA doesnāt make you Catholic. It confirms you into the Church.
I believe that you are forgetting the possibility that she may be already baptized.Yes but whether or not you had a full understanding of the faith considering you chose not to go through with the fullness of the Sacraments remains the question. One would say the Baptism of desire would only apply to those that had the desire.
OK, then for purposes of evangelization why would you not choose the Eucharist and Confirmation in order to experience the fullness of the faith but still evangelize the faith. I am confused.I had reasons I left RCIA towards the end and it was nothing to do with the teachings of the Church.
Iād like to point out that completing RCIA or leaving it has no way of hindering a persons ability to preach what they believe.
This post of yours and paperwight66ās are completely irrelevant.
Thatās totally off the bat. I have personal reasons. I said I didnāt leave for faith reasons.OK, then for purposes of evangelization why would you not choose the Eucharist and Confirmation in order to experience the fullness of the faith but still evangelize the faith. I am confused.
But it really isnāt. For someone to evangelize they need to be reflecting the practices of the faith. How can one reflect the faith without the Sacramental life? This is part of the point of New Evangelization. Is there something we can do to help you unite with the Sacraments?Thatās totally off the bat. I have personal reasons. I said I didnāt leave for faith reasons.
I preached like I did when I was Methodist, except clearly I was saying slightly different things. Iād never stop ranting about it. It was topic #1 always.But it really isnāt. For someone to evangelize they need to be reflecting the practices of the faith. How can one reflect the faith without the Sacramental life? This is part of the point of New Evangelization.
Probably not, which is why Iāve refrained from mentioning it.Is there something we can do to help you unite with the Sacraments?
How can you evangelize Catholicism without mentioning the Sacraments. The Eucharist is the source and summit of ecclesial life. It is the Sacrament of Reconciliation that allows us to take part in it. Maybe it is you who are off the bat with your comments. Maybe it is you that do not have a full understanding. We simply cannot transmit something we do not have. Please go back to RCIA, learn what must be learned, experience the full meaning of Christ, and then evangelize.I preached like I did when I was Methodist, except clearly I was saying slightly different things. Iād never stop ranting about it. It was topic #1 always.
Probably not, which is why Iāve refrained from mentioning it.
Such anger. It has no grounds.How can you evangelize Catholicism without mentioning the Sacraments. The Eucharist is the source and summit of ecclesial life. It is the Sacrament of Reconciliation that allows us to take part in it. Maybe it is you who are off the bat with your comments. Maybe it is you that do not have a full understanding. We simply cannot transmit something we do not have. Please go back to RCIA, learn what must be learned, experience the full meaning of Christ, and then evangelize.
There is no anger there it is simple fact that you are evangelizing the faith in an improper way by your own admission. This is why people that are not able to receive Eucharist are not generally allowed to do public ministry.Such anger. It has no grounds.
Nothing I taught was in error. Thatās very simple.There is no anger there it is simple fact that you are evangelizing the faith in an improper way by your own admission. This is why people that are not able to receive Eucharist are not generally allowed to do public ministry.
Then could you please tell me how you can evangelize the Church message without the Sacraments when the Eucharist is the source and the summit of all ecclesial life because what you are saying makes no sense unless you are not taught that the Eucharist the source and the summit of all ecclesial life or unless you are admitting you are not evangelizing as a Catholic.Nothing I taught was in error. Thatās very simple.