S
sambos671
Guest
I don’t see how I’m condesending. I just disagree with you and Maria. I haven’t said you aren’t qualified to have an opinion. Is everyone who disagrees with you condesending? Did I invalidate your knowledge? I’m just point out the facts. Thats all. As far as Harry Benjamin the AMA feels the Jury is still out on his claims. So there are others still in disagreement with him. I have no problem with that as far as not relying on scriptures and your claimFirst of all I was going to hold it back, but since you brought it up. I think your attitude is condescending thus uncharitable. While charity is not one of my big issues here, I am only bringing it up in a pot calling the kettle black capicity Since you say the soul does not have gender, fine. Sometime spirit and soul are separated Ill say Maria has female spirit. Sex is between the legs and gender is between th legs. The late Harry Benjamin who is the top authority on transsexual/transgender issues would disagree with you. You are so dog gone focused on physicalness and you use religous platitutudes to hide that superficiality in your thinking. I sugest you don’t lean on scripture so much. After all it is scripture that says personal interpetation of it isn’t allowed ans the Catholic church is not solascriptura. Nurture has proven not to determine femininity or masculinity. In my case if it did, I’d be the most macho thing walking the Earth. In the coming few days Ill find sources. Sorry while my brain is good at rememeber facts and story Iv’e read, it isn’t good at making footnotes in my mind especially if I read it long ago. I’m a degreed meteorologist , but I couldn’t for the life of me remeber specically remember where I read upper air divergence is condusive to low level convection, but I know it well, and no non meteorologist who hasn’t read a thing about weather has any business questioning me on it. What Maria is doing is just to live life as a be accepted as a woman.
. You are again misstaken again. The Catholic Church does not condemn all personal interpretation of scripture as long as it isn’t contrary to the Magisterium. So far I haven’t said anything contrary to the Magisterium. It seem you would throw out scripture but here is what the Catholic church saysAfter all it is scripture that says personal interpetation of it isn’t allowed ans the Catholic church is not solascriptura
Also note"Therefore, the study of the sacred page should be the very soul of sacred theology. The ministry of the Word, too - pastoral preaching, catechetics and all forms of Christian instruction, among which the liturgical homily should hold pride of place - is healthily nourished and thrives in holiness through the Word of Scripture."111
andAll the faithful share in understanding and handing on revealed truth. They have received the anointing of the Holy Spirit, who instructs them53 and guides them into all truth.54
Which does not contrast with thisfrom the intimate sense of spiritual realities which [believers] experience",59 the sacred Scriptures "grow with the one who reads them
. So scripture should not be disregarded or used as a buffet pick this or pick that. But understood as a whole within the the living Tradition of the Whole Church. It is you who stand on the outside wanting to change definitions and meanings. I have not. After all I am Catholic and I uphold the Catholic Teaching on this. It is certain Anglicans who have changed the meanings and made scripture irrelevant not I.Read the Scripture within “the living Tradition of the whole Church”.
