P
pnewton
Guest
I like this statement from the article:
*Dr Stavrakopoulou’s claims that God had a wife appeared to be backed up by her own research into the subject. *
She is her own authority and evidence!
The above post gives the proper perspective into this theory. The obvious error this scholar makes is to approach the Bible devoid of God. If God did not exist, her perspective that she reads backwards into the some of the evidence sort of fits. What is absent, besides God, is why, if there was no God, would there ever be a supression of one god over another? The “how” of monotheist development in a godless vacuum makes no sense.
I would say that she needs to provide at least one manuscript prior to this supposed revision to have any real evidence. Of course this will never happen as there really is a God that led Israel through a lot of bumps and wrong turns through history.
*Dr Stavrakopoulou’s claims that God had a wife appeared to be backed up by her own research into the subject. *
She is her own authority and evidence!
I would say that she needs to provide at least one manuscript prior to this supposed revision to have any real evidence. Of course this will never happen as there really is a God that led Israel through a lot of bumps and wrong turns through history.