O
otm
Guest
I am aware that Bishop Vasa has said that he will not use the VIRTUS program until there is more research about it.His outspokeness on the Bishops’ evil sex ed curriculum VIRTUS and “Talking About Touching” (also goes by a couple other names) was the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Over the past three months, I have compiled quite a list of articles with information on this VIRTUS topic
I think that if the good Father was calling it an “evil” program, then perhaps there is the reason that he has been silenced.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if the opinion is not completely founded on facts. Given that the program was accepted by the vast majority of bishops, and it was put into place because they needed to make a response to the sexual abuse of children by priests in the past and needed to get off the dime and do something, it may be that the program was not well chosen. It may well be that the program is flawed. It may well be that the program is seriously flawed.
However, if (and I have no way of knowing if he did or did not) Father Altier publicly said that the program is evil, the logical conclusion is that the bishops are doing evil; at least, that is the conclusion that most people would come to.
It is well and fine to say that one does not agree with a choice of the bishops, but one needs to use some tact and diplomacy. If one goes off accusing, or being perceived as accusing, the bishops of collectively promoting evil, one is probably going to get silenced, as one should.
It is one thing to say that the program is unwise, or that it is inappropriate, or that parts of it may go too far. It is another thing altogether to simply say the program is evil.
