T
TheAtheist
Guest
Why do you try so hard to claim Deists for your “team”? I don’t see how you have anything in common with them that you don’t have with atheists. Whether they believe in a god or not, it is certainly not your god. It is what they often refer to as Nature or some undescribable “higher power.”
I wish to raise a simple objection to all of this - as it is actually one of my largest pet peeves.Because they are often claimed for the atheist team. You will not find an atheist website that does not use the founding Fathers to hammer Christianity. The same websites conveniently ignore the fact that the Founding Fathers unanimously hammer atheism.
Why do we even care if a particular figure is on a “team?”
Take the case of Albert Einstein. A lot of disingenious statements have been made about the man regarding the status of his orientation toward religion.
Taking all of his quotes out of context - can portray the man as a Christian or a Jew.
Much to my dismay, Richard Dawkins also engaged in this game of semantics and attempted to claim that Einstein was being “poetic” about his orientation toward nature and the idea of a god and that he was in fact an atheist.
I find the great irony of course is that Einstein (who by proper historical scholarship ~ ie: People more engaged with rendering his views and not invested in this debate - is in fact a Deist) did have a number of telling remarks against people who engaged in such debates.
To paraphrase him: the Bible is in fact mythical, but nothing to be sneered at as it was man’s attempt to understand the universe - and atheists who waste their time being angry and argumentative have lost the whole narrative (that being the majesty of the universe and attempts to investiage it).
I ask all of you : What profit us if Einstein were a Christian or an atheist?
Or if the Founding Fathers were a cabal of secret Freemasonic Deists?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5189/c51896754cb68cae40a1e4aa6cce06ce95147f43" alt="Winking face :wink: 😉"
If Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Benedict XVI, Billy Graham, TD Jakes, etc. all decided to convert to Radical Islam tomorrow and praised Osama Bin Laden as their leader (a most unlikely event
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e8f/e8e8f10ee7969490cfdc1dc1612ff37bbd0ae6f5" alt="Stick out tongue :p :p"
… I would expect everyone here to be unmoved in their positions regarding the existence or non-existence of a deity.
Mind you - i’m sure all of us would be blinking and wondering what the heck just happened ~ and perhaps we could all collectively agree they’ve gone insane.
BUT - the movement of figures to and from “teams” shouldn’t make much of a difference to anyone.
The whole “team model” is predicated on the idea that people who self identify with a religion, or even a philosophy or political ideology have their interactions shaped by only that particular standpoint.
I’m sure the most reflective of us can agree - human interaction is neither that simplistic nor that boring.