I
Isaiah45_9
Guest
I like your avatar, a lotYou are in good company!![]()
I like your avatar, a lotYou are in good company!![]()
Seriously? You donāt believe Protestants have values or morals? Or donāt look at Scripture?They can define the bible and their faith any way they wish; no values, or morals involved coming to scripture.
Nonsensical. Evangelical Protestants consistently put us mainline folks and Roman Catholics to shame when it comes to Christian morality as well as biblical knowledge. We could take some lessons from them.Seriously? You donāt believe Protestants have values or morals? Or donāt look at Scripture?
That is only true for 2384 out of 38000 or is it 43000 denominations that we have now.They can define the bible and their faith any way they wish; no values, or morals involved coming to scripture.
True. Even some cults or what we consider non-christian like Mormons or even JWās live "holyāā and disciplined lives.Nonsensical. Evangelical Protestants consistently put us mainline folks and Roman Catholics to shame when it comes to Christian morality as well as biblical knowledge. We could take some lessons from them.
That is only true for 2384 out of 38000 or is it 43000 denominations that we have now.
Really? It is easier to go along to get along. It is easier to rest in a majority or with staus quo and to rail against any rebel or reformer. It is easier to drink milk (what someone else has digested) than to eat meat (what you must digest).Because the road is wider, +++
You clearly believe all that the RCC claims and as such it appears you are in the right place for you on your walk. Best of luck on your journey.I may not be exactly who youāre looking to hear from, given that I was raised Mormon and then went Protestant and now converting Catholic. So not an ex-Catholic! But, I have most definitely been on a spiritual journey and have a few thoughts.
Mormonism is big on priesthood authority and central authority; they claim that the priesthood keys were restored to Joseph Smith (a whole different topic). Anyway, due to this, the first place I looked after leaving Mormonism and spending a few years away from organized religion was the Catholic Church. I wanted to worship in a church that claimed a direct, unbroken line to God.
What sent me running for the hills in terrorfrom Catholicism was fear of eternal Hell (not really a doctrine in Mormonism), as well as an oversimplification of the mortal sin doctrine. I didnāt fully grasp the concept that mortal sin must involve not only grave matter, but full knowledge and consent. Without understanding how to interpret those additional qualifications, it appeared to me as if everyone around me was going to Hell! Scary. (My friends, sadly, do their fair share of grave matter. As does much of secular society these days).
But with a better understanding of Catholic theology, I see now that things arenāt quite that simplistic. I have confidence that Godās judgements will be fair. (Another topic).
Back on track: I become a passionate Christian Universalist (no eternal Hell, please!) I found myself a non-denominational Church that didnāt have eternal damnation listed on their statement of beliefs. I read the Bible and fell in love with Jesus. I loved being able to worship according to my own interpretation of the Bible. I loved the once-saved-always-saved flavor of Evangelical Protestantism in particular. Protestantism felt warm, positive, and āBible based.ā None of those corrupt popes, āmedievalā rituals or costumes. I didnāt see any medievalism in the Bible; it looked to me like the Catholic church just made it all up long after the Bible was complied. They existed only to protect their own power and wealth, and keep their believers in the dark about Biblical truth.
Or so I thoughtā¦
I was really hungry for answers. Universalism āfeltā right, but I wanted more data. I approached Christianity like a treasure hunt. My mission was to learn the Bible super well and find the Protestant denomination that was the most Biblical. What I ended up discovering is that they all disagree, and have always disagreed. From the earliest days of the reformation, Protestants have been bickering over doctrine. For good reason: the Bible is not always clear. Read it 1,000 times and you still wonāt be quite sure if youāre āinterpretingā it correctly. But then this is often something people have to learn the hard way for themselves.
I found myself reading an obscure PhD thesis on the Jewish custom of ālaying on of handsā and threw my own hands up in the air. āWouldnāt it be nice if Jesus had established an actual church that lasted through the ages? What happened to the churches those apostles started? Boy, sure wish I could talk to them.ā And it hit me like a ton of bricks. Christ never expected anyone in 2014 to independently interpret 5,000 years of salvation history. Youād have to get PhDs in multiple ancient languages, near eastern cultures, near eastern history, etc., in addition to a theological degree to make an āeducatedā guess. Besides, who compiled the Bible in the 4th century the first place? Oh yeah, the Catholics.
I was tired of studying and being cranky, locking myself away with my computer and books, just trying to know which church to join. I wanted to start actually living a Christian life. And I wanted to know for sure that what I believed wasnāt just my own opinion or best guess.
Iām excited to start RCIA this Fall!
Protestantism allows people to ādoā Christianity on their own terms. It allows people to interpret the Bible in their own way and create their own churches after their own idea of who Jesus is. Depending on where a person is at in their spiritual journey, this can be incredibly appealing and comforting.
But once you start really wanting divine authority, and think critically about the pedigree of your theological ideas, thatās when you go Catholic imo. I have discovered that not only is Catholicism wonderfully and deeply Biblical, but the writings of the ancient Church Fathers are indeed compatible with todayās chatechism.
Praise God, it is the same Church Christ started in ancient times.
There is simply no other Christian Church that makes the claims Catholicism does. Catholicism claims to have existed since the time of Christ under an unbroken line of central papal leadership. No other Church claims that or can demonstrate that. The Catholic Churchās claim is consistent with Paulās explanation of what the Church is: the body of Christ, with Christ as itās head. Because Christ is the head of the Church, it can not and has not failed. In Gethsemene, Christ prayed that His Church would be āoneā and Catholicism has demonstrated that. Catholicism is, to my knowledge, the oldest organization (political or religious) existent on the planet. That continuity and unity donāt just happen. Human beings donāt cooperate very well. The Catholic Church has weathered the centuries because it is not a human organization, it is a divine organization.
This is why I do not think you will tire of the Catholic Church. It is simply unrivaled and unique in itās claims; unique among all Christian faiths, and unique among all world religions. No other faith system on the planet makes the claims that the Catholic Church does.
(continued)
Thank you. Nice to meet you. I like the name too, however itās a nickname from a coworker not my real name.Hi jericho777. So nice to see another jericho around here.![]()
Iām listening. You are right. Iām sorry for adding to that. I come here because I am curious and love to exchange ideas and perspectives. Also, wondering if I can find someone that listens to the concerns I have as well as understanding my current experience in the church. I am a struggling Catholic and really want my kids to find a home in the church when they grow up. I honestly donāt see that happening. I think I am entering a āsafeā thread and then get wrapped up in the negativity. I do notice quite a bit of that here in general. It is hard not to get sucked into the vortex.The negative dialogue here is quite evident in many threads.
. To emphasize how much we share in Christ is difficult for some posters who prefer to criticize and ostracize others.
The Devil laughs, āwith Christians like these who needs enemiesā.
I fear the changes of heart I have seen, over the past 50 years. Hence, I am in the Continuum. But that wasnāt the point of my question to EC. I wanted to stress that the words came from a Lutheran source, representing a Lutheran viewpoint, and not necessarily a universal one at that.While the LWF arenāt necessarily my cup of tea all the time, we should listen when our fellow Christians speak. The LWF arenāt completely sound, but neither are they completely beyond the pale. If thereās one thing we can learn from the history of the Church, itās that pulling up the drawbridge will reinforce differences rather than encourage a change of heart.
Yeah. And Iād like to know how many Christian denominations there are.That is only true for 2384 out of 38000 or is it 43000 denominations that we have now.
I think that is eminently foolish.I recently read a poll of why people leave the christian church in general. One of the top ten was because, āthe way christians treat each other online.ā Wow, that says a lot.
Just a wee correction.You clearly believe all that the RCC claims and as such it appears you are in the right place for you on your walk. Best of luck on your journey.
I have no idea. But the usual figures cited, which grow (and there is a reason why they grow) and currently seem to be given as around 30-35 thousand, are derived ultimately from internet chaining citations derived from a misunderstanding of a particular academic group who compile statistics on world religion, and use an odd method, in places, to do so. I long ago gave up trying to bring any perspective to the subject.Yeah. And Iād like to know how many Christian denominations there are.
Iāve been asking someone to give me a quote and the source to back it up, but so far no one has been able to answer.
I think that while that original source was indeed flawed, it (30-35 thousand) is simply a common sense answer, when one estimates the number of mainline denominations.I have no idea. But the usual figures cited, which grow (and there is a reason why they grow) and currently seem to be given as around 30-35 thousand, are derived ultimately from internet chaining citations derived from a misunderstanding of a particular academic group who compile statistics on world religion, and use an odd method, in places, to do so. I long ago gave up trying to bring any perspective to the subject.
GKC