U
una_ecclesia
Guest
OK, let’s build on this then. To what extent do you think that on a social level, a lay celibate Catholic fits well into the typical parish community? How likely is the typical Catholic in the pew to encounter such a type, and actually pity him, because he automatically associates celibacy with loneliness, rather than acknowledging that he has (or at least likely has) a charism, considered objectively superior to the married life, for which he will be rewarded greatly in heaven? How common is it that parish events are largely geared towards married people with families, who receive parish support? Let’s remove the “gay” question for a moment, and consider the general case of anyone who is unable to marry.i’m not talking about you, but the idea behind forming special roles and vocations, which specifically single out and identify certain people. Just be Catholic, live the faith, grow in holiness; people from all walks of life live celibate lives.
Some people here (including yours truly and the OP) have mentioned the promotion or esteem of lay celibacy in our wider parish culture would do quite well for SSA types, precisely because the most viable path for most of them will be lay celibacy. But you don’t have to limit such a promotion specifically to SSA people.
You don’t care much for programs specifically geared towards gay people, yet you were fine with Courage, which is, well, a program geared specifically towards gay people to help them live holy lives within the context of a larger community. However, Courage doesn’t have to be the only such program that is guided by the true teachings of the Church.
So far these are two points that have been brought up. Are you opposed to either one of these? If so, why?