Part II
Okay, now something a bit more challenging: Looking at vocations differently. First, let’s acknowledge that every baptized person has a vocation to the universal call to holiness. If someone wants to expound on that, please start another thread; I mentioned it here, it’s been mentioned upthread, it’s not covered thoroughly so go to it, but somewhere else.
I’ve had different thoughts about vocations as a single person (who believes my vocation is/was marriage). The church promotes 3 capital-V vocations: priesthood or diaconate, the religious life, and marriage and family, and then somewhere adjacent, consecrated virginity. I personally don’t think “singlehood” is a vocation. I know others who think otherwise, and that’s fine, it’s not the topic but I’m explaining a thought process and that is relevant. Anyway…I used to think, since the main three were the be all and end all of vocations that everyone must be called to one, even people who were LGBT, or had impediments to marriage. Wuuuuuut? Yeah, and even though I’ve rethunk it, abandoned the idea, I"ve come back to it. Wuuuuuut, you say? Please, bear with me. I think my vocation (marriage) has been “frustrated” for lack of a better word, mainly due to lack of single, and appropriately disposed, men. Being same-sex attracted would also be a frustration. It doesn’t mean that there isn’t a vocation to marriage or priesthood or religious life; it may mean that marriage might not be realistic option, it may mean that the seminary will say no to an applicant, the same for someone who believes they are called to the monastic life or sisterhood.
Moving on, my thoughts evolved a little. I wondered if the way vocations have been “marketed” by the Church is a little wonky. First, there was an emphasis on the priesthood, we prayed for more priests due to the priesthood “shortage.” Then I noticed that the religious life was added not much later. Finally, going by the prayer for vocations we say at Mass, the vocation to marriage completes the list of the main capital-V vocations. No prayers for consecrated virgins, and rare, hastily added prayers for singles. When approached this way it kind of leaves singles behind. I mean besides praying that they find their vocations, what else do pray for for singles?
What if…not everyone had a big-V vocation? And what if that we stopped talking about vocations, and “being called to” often inmeaningless ways. It sounds so spiritual, and I find it mildly dismissive at times. Maybe talking about that universal call was re-emphasized? But the discussion doesn’t end there.
So why talk about LGBT persons’ vocation? For one, they are virtually locked out of the capital-V vocations, especially if certain people have anything to say about it. It means that desire for a spouse and children won’t be realized, it means no matter how holy and chaste one is, some jerk out there is worried that you are a pervert, etc. (I don’t need to re-iterate this, do I?).