K
KarenNC
Guest
As I and other posters have said, many people refer to themselves as Wiccans, whether or not they follow any actual written practice of the faith, or know anything about it other than the name and that some practitioners use magic…is another story.
Agreed. I see it as partially due to the form of the religion, partially due to the changing nature of Wicca overall from a private initiatory mystery religion to a broader, more mainstream religion, partially due to widespread dissemination of “how-to” books on the subject including many which don’t explore the actual ethics or real world consequences of actions they propose, and the newness of the religion. Wicca has been around for less than a hundred years in any form—compare the myriad of streams within it to those within the Christian Church of the same period (and ongoing) and I think you will see what I mean in terms of newness.
I have had people, who refer to their religion as Wicca, tell me they have used menstrual blood in love binding spells. Most often it is put on a personal item of the beloved, but I have heard on a few occasions of it being placed in food or drink.
That’s what I wanted to know, thanks.
I don’t feel I need to defend the practice on their behalf because I do not share their faith, belief in magic, etc.
Neither do I share it. The assertion that this was a usual practice simply went contrary to what the Wiccans I have encountered personally and online would consider to be ethical behavior, so I was very surprised.
However, as far as using blood in spells goes, nearly everyone I have ever discussed the subject with only uses their own blood, and it is not ingested by others, and very rarely by themselves. It is believed to add power to spells, to show great intention and commitment.
As I said, I am well aware that there are uses for blood in spellcraft and in other ritual and that there are many ways one could do so that would not involve the ethical issues of the particular situation described. Blood is a very powerful substance ritually, as Catholics in particular should know full well, else they would not insist on transubstantiation being superior to Communion as a symbolic act alone. It is the teaching of the actual presence of the real Body and real Blood that gives the ritual of Eucharist its meaning and effectiveness for them.
**The love binding use of menstrual blood is the only time I have outright heard of anyone unknowingly causing another to ingest blood, and there is conflict among spellworkers about love spells. Many practitioners of magic DO indeed consider them unethical, especially ones that involve blood.
This practice has a tremendous amount of controversy in the magickal community.**
And this is what I was getting at. The person who posted said that this particular practice (using menstrual blood unknowingly ingested by another as a love binding) was usual among Wiccans. I find that very hard to believe.
Agreed. I see it as partially due to the form of the religion, partially due to the changing nature of Wicca overall from a private initiatory mystery religion to a broader, more mainstream religion, partially due to widespread dissemination of “how-to” books on the subject including many which don’t explore the actual ethics or real world consequences of actions they propose, and the newness of the religion. Wicca has been around for less than a hundred years in any form—compare the myriad of streams within it to those within the Christian Church of the same period (and ongoing) and I think you will see what I mean in terms of newness.
I have had people, who refer to their religion as Wicca, tell me they have used menstrual blood in love binding spells. Most often it is put on a personal item of the beloved, but I have heard on a few occasions of it being placed in food or drink.
That’s what I wanted to know, thanks.
I don’t feel I need to defend the practice on their behalf because I do not share their faith, belief in magic, etc.
Neither do I share it. The assertion that this was a usual practice simply went contrary to what the Wiccans I have encountered personally and online would consider to be ethical behavior, so I was very surprised.
However, as far as using blood in spells goes, nearly everyone I have ever discussed the subject with only uses their own blood, and it is not ingested by others, and very rarely by themselves. It is believed to add power to spells, to show great intention and commitment.
As I said, I am well aware that there are uses for blood in spellcraft and in other ritual and that there are many ways one could do so that would not involve the ethical issues of the particular situation described. Blood is a very powerful substance ritually, as Catholics in particular should know full well, else they would not insist on transubstantiation being superior to Communion as a symbolic act alone. It is the teaching of the actual presence of the real Body and real Blood that gives the ritual of Eucharist its meaning and effectiveness for them.
**The love binding use of menstrual blood is the only time I have outright heard of anyone unknowingly causing another to ingest blood, and there is conflict among spellworkers about love spells. Many practitioners of magic DO indeed consider them unethical, especially ones that involve blood.
This practice has a tremendous amount of controversy in the magickal community.**
And this is what I was getting at. The person who posted said that this particular practice (using menstrual blood unknowingly ingested by another as a love binding) was usual among Wiccans. I find that very hard to believe.