Wow. That is really bad. Care to post a link?Studies show trained police miss their target (stationary, mind you) about 80% of the time.
Just so we can all review what it is you are saying here.
Wow. That is really bad. Care to post a link?Studies show trained police miss their target (stationary, mind you) about 80% of the time.
So clearly the 2nd Amendment is not some great guarantor that you won’t be killed by a bullet.Gun control doesn’t have to mean banning guns. I live in Canada. We have guns here. Lots of them. Not even close to how many we have in the US though. We lead the world in civilian owned guns per capita by an enormous margin. And the US has had “weapons grade” gun control since 1934, when all selective fire weapons were made “NFA Title II weapons,” which means they are all Heavily regulated by the federal government. Added to that, are the innumerable gun control laws that further restri…
Kinda like that ‘certain point of view’ that we all are familiar with from Star wars fiction.In a sense
It is when people discuss the actual process to do this that they realize just how unpopular this particular route is.I always think “Stop making gun ownership a right.” But no one wants to actually do that.
That is what I think needs to happen. No one really seems interested into finding the root cause of these horrible attacks. Instead, they exploit the attacks to push their own personal political agendas. We have always had lots of guns in this country. We have not always had mass shootings. Something changed. That’s what we have to figure out and solve.Step 3: spend some time actually trying to find out why mass shootings have become so commonplace in the past several decades when they weren’t before
And in a country with the right to bear arms enshrined in our Bill of Rights, Isn’t That Ridiculous? On its face? Our supreme law recognizes that you can carry guns for lawful purposes, and here you are trying to figure out how to disable a potential murderer by hitting him with the corner of a chalkboard eraser.Me too. I can’t carry in a school, obviously, so I have to know how to weaponize other common classroom items in the event of a school invasion…
Not need. Want. Loads of countries don’t have a 2nd amendment style right to bear arms and frankly do.much better than the US without it.casslean:![]()
It is when people discuss the actual process to do this that they realize just how unpopular this particular route is.I always think “Stop making gun ownership a right.” But no one wants to actually do that.
More people understand they need the 2nd amendment in place then those that want it removed.
Excellent - let’s set up a government program to give a father to every fatherless child How many can I sign you up for?Chris-Wa1:![]()
Agreed, most of these shooters were raised by single mothers. The destruction of the family needs to be addressed.Personally, I think the problem is rooted in the gradual destruction of family life and the rejection of God in our personal and public life. Those are the changes I see that probably contribute greatly to the rise of extreme violence.
So explain to me why fatherless and spiritually dry teens are not doing this across the rest of the the world?Every one of these shooters is profoundly lacking Jesus Christ. Nearly every one lacks a father.
Where on earth could they have gotten that ridiculous idea?A majority of Americans think they have a right to be armed.