What do traditionalists think of LifeTeen Masses' appeal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcliffor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I personally never thought it would happen and believed it was probably just a test balloon so to speak that the Vatican put out to gauge public opinion. Given the utter consternation and horror of the Bishops, the French and other European Bishops in particular, probably sealed its doom.

But I’m still hopeful and continue to pray.
I don’t know what the Holy Father will do formally, Palmas, but I do think that the Indult will broaden as younger bishops do, out of simple obedience, what the old Holy Father asked the bishops to do: provide for a broader and more generous application of the Indult.
 
I don’t know what the Holy Father will do formally, Palmas, but I do think that the Indult will broaden as younger bishops do, out of simple obedience, what the old Holy Father asked the bishops to do: provide for a broader and more generous application of the Indult.
Well we can always hope Kirk, but since so many Bishops haven’t seen fit to obey so far, what makes you think they will now? You forget Kirk, while still in ultimate control, many of if not most Bishops consider the Holy Father to be first among equals only and what they do in their Diocese is their own business. That is just a sad fact of life of the post conciliar Church.

As many have said When Rome speaks the Bishops usually ignore.

Very very sad but very very true.
 
Pax vobiscum!

I would love to see the experiment that one poster suggested a ways up. Put the LifeTeen Mass at 8 AM and a Solemn Latin Mass at 5 PM and see which one the teens show up to.

My mom works with a woman whose family goes to one of the more “progressive” churches in our area…which will remain nameless…and they do a LifeTeen Mass there, which I and my friends from Newman Club accidentally went to once (on our way home from camping and weren’t able to make the 5:30 at Holy Rosary). Anyway, this woman told my mom that the LifeTeen Mass is the only one that her teenage kids will go to…they simply won’t go to another one. So obviously, from this example, we can see that at least SOME (and I’m sure this is representative of a great many more) of these teens go to LifeTeen simply because it is “fun time”, which is exactly how this one Mass that I went to was treated. The altar servers were wearing street clothes, the EMHCs were not dressed up and didn’t know what to do when my friend and I went to recieve on the tongue, one of the ushers was wearing a big pair of sunglasses. There was absolutely NO sense of sacredness to the LifeTeen Mass at all.

I don’t have a problem with the LifeTeen program itself. From what I have seen, it is orthodox. But, I have a HUGE problem with the way they do their teen Masses.

In Christ,
Rand
 
I personally never thought it would happen and believed it was probably just a test balloon so to speak that the Vatican put out to gauge public opinion. Given the utter consternation and horror of the Bishops, the French and other European Bishops in particular, probably sealed its doom.

But I’m still hopeful and continue to pray.
Almost all the major magazines and papers covered the story and said that the Pope had taken steps or had signed something, it was a just a matter of time before the document was released. I think if it was a just a test, they might have said something like “the pope is considering,” like they did when they wrote about limbo. Plus, Una Voce made such a big deal about it, I think it has to be for real. The bishops might not have liked it, but public opinion didn’t seem to be as harsh as I expected. One of the benefits about a reletavist society is that anything goes, and most people think is someone wants something, they have the right to it.
 
Why then are they so popular?
You may be taking a biased sampling. If on a given Sunday in a given area there are e.g. 100 non LifeTeen Masses, and 5 LifeTeen Masses, those LT Masses may look very crowded even if only 10% of the Mass-going population is attending them.
 
I’m a LifeTeen CORE member in Montgomery Alabama. Our LifeTeen Mass is an exercise in reverence, and in keeping with all established norms for the celebration of Mass. The music is anything but pop or rock, and is sacred in nature. The Life Night held immediately following Mass is a time of fellowship and learning for the kids entrusted to us. These young people are there because they want to be, and the witness to our faith that they render is really inspiring. Quite a few of our youth attend public school, and the time they are able to spend with Life Teen is vital in their continuing instruction in our faith.
In all sincerity I ask, what then makes your LifeTeen Mass a “LifeTeen Mass”? It must be different in some way, else why the unique name? What is the difference between it and any other Mass at at your church?
 
I don’t have a problem with the LifeTeen program itself. From what I have seen, it is orthodox. But, I have a HUGE problem with the way they do their teen Masses.
That is pretty much my sentiment, I really wish they just would not toy with the Mass, if we don’t expose our teens to a mainstream liturgy, then they’re going to get used to Lifeteen and when they go off to college and find out that’s not how Mass is, they don’t go anymore. They either become Christmas and Easter only Catholics or they join a local pentecostal or charismatic fundamentalist church. The Lifeteen Mass at my church, which thankfully follows the rubrics (but still plays that dreadful loud sreeching stuff), has more Vatican II generationers (senior citizens) then teenagers. Barbara Streisand singing Eminem and P-didy songs would be better then what we have. My pastor commented about how he feels my RCIA sessions are going well and even the teenage boy who is attending is getting something out of, I think he really is seriously going to restructure youth ministry at our parish now.

Lifenite=good
Lifeteen Mass=not going to go there
 
I only have experience with two official LT Masses, but plenty of experience with college Masses (which depending on where you’re going and who’s in charge, might not look all that different), plus Masses at regular parishes and a shrine.

At the LifeTeen Masses I’ve attended, it actually had a lot of families, not just teens. I do think that the late time has something to do with how many people go…if it’s between 9am and 6pm, I’m more likely going to go to the one at 6. The one LT Mass I went to, the priest did discuss the importance of going to Confession on a regular basis, so while I don’t know much about it at that particular parish, they are emphasizing a Sacrament that does get overlooked very often.

I have noticed that college Masses tend to use more contemporary music, probably in hopes of appealing to college students. Every Mass I go to is full though, even the one in the morning, and it’s mostly college kids who go, meaning they’re getting themselves up and going, and their parents aren’t forcing them to go. I will say though, whenever we play a traditional hymn, you wouldn’t believe how many people actually sing it! The difference is amazing.
 
In my experience both in college and laterin in assisting with the college student center here in the town I moved to after graduation is that the young adults who grew up with the especially “creative” teen masses were most likely to switch over to “independent” protestant “feel good” sects once they arrived at college and were not allowed to maintain the “fluffy” liturgical abuses to which they had become attached. Too often they were amazed that the music leaders were obliged to pick music relevant to the scripture reading of the day, and that they needed to come dressed nicer that what they’d been playing sand-pit volleyball earlier that afternoon if they were going to serve at mass that evening. The vocations I have seen develop most often in college age students are those who came from parishes that had active youth programs that did so in a way that still taught respect for the liturgical guidelines of the Church, so that they did not feel out of place when they “graduated” from the “Life Teen” environment and were expected to take on a more focused approach to worship in mass.
 
I have noticed that college Masses tend to use more contemporary music, probably in hopes of appealing to college students. Every Mass I go to is full though, even the one in the morning, and it’s mostly college kids who go, meaning they’re getting themselves up and going, and their parents aren’t forcing them to go. I will say though, whenever we play a traditional hymn, you wouldn’t believe how many people actually sing it! The difference is amazing.
Pax tecum!

I saw part of a Mass on TV one day from the basilica at the University of Notre Dame. They had their full choir, a cantor with an amazing voice, and the organ. And guess what? The church was filled with college students.

In Christ,
Rand
 
LifeTeen “Mass” is a patronizing effort by a clergy desperate to be “with it” to fill pews with young people . They’re chumming with pop music as bait, hoping to hook something. The problem is that it normalizes a banal revival meeting setting as the sacred Mass. It’s the camel’s nose under the tent. What happens to the liturgy when these rock mass “recruits” become adults and decide they don’t want to leave their drums and Fenders behind?
 
Given the utter consternation and horror of the Bishops, the French and other European Bishops in particular, probably sealed its doom.
Not quite. My sources tell me that it is no longer a question of “if” but “when and how”. Pope Benedict is not impressed by the whining of a bunch of bishops who’ve done nothing to keep their churches from taking a nose-dive over the past 40 some years.

As to LifeTeen-bad idea all around. I’ve never been impressed with the idea of “as long as it gets people in the pews”. Big deal and who cares if there are bodies in pews-what matters is the true and traditional understanding of “full and active participation”. How many of these people have a decent understanding of the Mass (what it is, the point of it, what we should be doing at Mass, etc) and take that and use it to build their faith? I’ve met some people that the whole “LifeTeen” thing was beneficial for them and now have moved on to being staunch Catholics. However, I just don’t see why we need to kowtow to fads. The idea should be, “This is the Church, this is what we believe, do, how we worship, etc. Take it or leave it.”
 
What are the “many abuses” that occur in the life teen masses?
 
I have been looking into getting it for my church, but maybe i should reconsider? I had no idea it was so bad. If it does turn kids more religious, whats the problem? I dont have a stance on this issue because I dont know enough, but please give me some correct information. Would it be a sin, then, to attend one of these Masses?
 
I have been looking into getting it for my church, but maybe i should reconsider? I had no idea it was so bad. If it does turn kids more religious, whats the problem? I dont have a stance on this issue because I dont know enough, but please give me some correct information. Would it be a sin, then, to attend one of these Masses?
Jesusrocks,

LifeTeen is not bad! It is solidly orthodox in teaching, leads teens closer to Christ, and encourages a deep devotional life. Most people are reacting here to two things about the program:
  1. The Liturgical Abuse of gathering around the altar for the liturgy of the Eucharist
  2. The use of modern music at liturgy
The first major abuse has been corrected after the LT program was asked to stop gathering around the altar. Other liturgical abuses may occur at a LT mass, but these are not endemic to LT itself, but rather are byproducts of priests and pastoral staff doing their own thing. LT does not encourage these abuses.

The second issue is one that has gotten (and continues to receive) much attention here and is larger than LT itself. Contrary to much ballyhooed opinion here on these forums, modern music is not an abomination in the liturgy.

Should sacred music–specifically chant–have pride of place in the liturgy…absolutely. Should 21st century catholicism make greater effort to recover this musical patrimony–absolutely.

Is LT bad because it uses modern music in the liturgy…no!

Keith
 
Jesusrocks,

LifeTeen is not bad! It is solidly orthodox in teaching, leads teens closer to Christ, and encourages a deep devotional life. Most people are reacting here to two things about the program:
  1. The Liturgical Abuse of gathering around the altar for the liturgy of the Eucharist
  2. The use of modern music at liturgy
The first major abuse has been corrected after the LT program was asked to stop gathering around the altar. Other liturgical abuses may occur at a LT mass, but these are not endemic to LT itself, but rather are byproducts of priests and pastoral staff doing their own thing. LT does not encourage these abuses.

The second issue is one that has gotten (and continues to receive) much attention here and is larger than LT itself. Contrary to much ballyhooed opinion here on these forums, modern music is not an abomination in the liturgy.

Should sacred music–specifically chant–have pride of place in the liturgy…absolutely. Should 21st century catholicism make greater effort to recover this musical patrimony–absolutely.

Is LT bad because it uses modern music in the liturgy…no!

Keith
Side note, as of last Sunday the gathering around the altar had not stopped at least in southern California. Since it occurs predominately at Lifeteen and nationside too at that, it would seem that it is at a minimum tolerated there.
 
Side note, as of last Sunday the gathering around the altar had not stopped at least in southern California. Since it occurs predominately at Lifeteen and nationside too at that, it would seem that it is at a minimum tolerated there.
Palmas85,

As a member of the LT steering committee at my last parish during the time of the change, I can tell you that the LT program officially required all LT parish programs to stop gathering arounds the altar. In addition to the requirement, they provided suggestions on how to make that change in each parish.

Just because there are some priests and liturgists who refused the requirement does not make LT a bad thing–nor is their refusal to stop gathering around the altar the LT program’s fault.

Heck, at my last parish the LT Director and I had to stand firm about the change, because the pastor and pastoral staff were going to dig in their heels and not stop gathering around the altar.

Standing around the altar is not encouraged by the LT program, nor did they make an official change and then wink knowingly at all the folks who were going to continue gathering around the altar.

Keith
 
Palmas85,

As a member of the LT steering committee at my last parish during the time of the change, I can tell you that the LT program officially required all LT parish programs to stop gathering arounds the altar. In addition to the requirement, they provided suggestions on how to make that change in each parish.

Just because there are some priests and liturgists who refused the requirement does not make LT a bad thing–nor is their refusal to stop gathering around the altar the LT program’s fault.

Heck, at my last parish the LT Director and I had to stand firm about the change, because the pastor and pastoral staff were going to dig in their heels and not stop gathering around the altar.

Standing around the altar is not encouraged by the LT program, nor did they make an official change and then wink knowingly at all the folks who were going to continue gathering around the altar.

Keith
The problem is that because people feel that they can do things being an accepted innovative mass, it’s like a box of chocolates, so to say. You can never be sure what you get.

Before my children attend LifeTeen (my oldest is nine) I will attend first. If it’s orthodox with the acception of the music, they can go. Any deviation from the norms of the liturgy, they don’t.
In our area, the LifeTeen Mass is at a parish with a great priest. He runs orthodox. I would trust that this LifeTeen is by the rules. However, it’s a trust but verify situation.
Any parent who does not go to the mass first may be in for a surprise.
 
The problem is that because people feel that they can do things being an accepted innovative mass, it’s like a box of chocolates, so to say. You can never be sure what you get.

Before my children attend LifeTeen (my oldest is nine) I will attend first. If it’s orthodox with the acception of the music, they can go. Any deviation from the norms of the liturgy, they don’t.
In our area, the LifeTeen Mass is at a parish with a great priest. He runs orthodox. I would trust that this LifeTeen is by the rules. However, it’s a trust but verify situation.
Any parent who does not go to the mass first may be in for a surprise.
I think that is a wise thing to do. In my experience, adherence to the norms of liturgical celebration varies from parish to parish. A lot depends upon the pastor, obviously, but the pastoral staff also has a lot of influence.

It’s unfortunately a rarity for parents to take as much interest in the spiritual formation of their children as you have outlined above.

Keith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top