a very limited observance. we want to be like apostle Thomas, able to examine the evidence with our own hands.
If, as I believe it is, the flesh is the flesh of God, why would we want people to go up and touch it. That is why many Catholics are against communion in the hand. That is GOD. I doubt that many people even within the church understand that. I mean, I don’t completely understand it, it is a mystery, but I do believe it.
And since I believe that that host is God, I fast for an hour before receiving it, I wait twenty minutes after receiving it before I eat anything else, I make sure that I have not committed any serious sin since my last confession, I sit prayerfully during mass thanking God for the gift of himself to me.
Mr. HashemEchad, you say that we are obsessed with blood and bodies. We are not, I can’t think of a single person who visualizes a bloody piece of flesh when they go to receive Holy Communion. I always visualized the priest holding the child Jesus in his hands and Jesus coming to me, and agreeing to be with me though I am sinful and unworthy. I then kneel and thank Jesus for coming to me. I am often distracted, but I wish that every time I receive Our Lord, I could pay attention, but I as I said, I am a sinful person, so I mess up. But I try to model myself after the saints, and every time I try to do better though, often I don’t.
As far as the saints whose bodies are exposed for people to see. What is so bad about that? It is just their bodies, just flesh, their soul is gone. The only reason why the Church does this is to show Catholics, and maybe sometimes non-Catholics, lets see how can I say this–
Let me put it this way, when I find that a saint, for example St. John Vianney, is incorrupt I rejoice. God loved that saint so much that he didn’t let their body be subjected to the corruption that sin causes. God is telling me that without a doubt, St. John Marie Vianney is in heaven, that if I follow the saint’s example, I will get to heaven to. God is pointing out this saint for special recognition by us, he is telling us to follow his example, that he was a good saint to follow the example of.
If you read the story of St. John Vianney, you will see why God chose him. He was not very smart, but despite that he converted an evil town and drew thousands of people to come back to God and to turn from their evil ways. He inflicted many punishments on himself and he fought the devil. He was a very good man. Some of the other saints had weaknesses, such as St. Claude de la Colombière , St. Margaret Mary said that he was in purgatory from the time of his death until the time of his burial because he had doubted for just a moment in the mercy of God. St. Augustine was an evil man before he converted and became a doctor of the Church, St. Thomas Aquinas had trouble with eating too much. St. Margaret Mary suffered from despair. They were not super human perfect beings, but God picked them to show us that they were good examples of what we should do.
The Church throughly examines the lives of every person who is canonized. They don’t want someone someday coming up with something against that person, so the Church is very insistent that every aspect of the person’s life is examined. I mean, wouldn’t that be really stupid of the Church to be sloppy even once, and then a couple years later the person who was declared saint was found to be evil. The Church is extremely careful in who they canonize.
Basically what I am saying is that the Church uses the saints and different miracles not as proof, but as back-up for what it says. It does not require that anyone believe in these miracles, but sometimes it does support them. Such as people don’t need to believe in Fatima, but the Church did officially say it was a miracle, and it supports the devotion to the rosary. I am sorry that these miracles of incorrupt bodies and hosts turned into flesh disgust you, but if you see it from our point of view, does it still disgust you?