Walking_Home:
Their “catechises” or the core of their doctrine has not been approved.
Please, get a bit of information about
HOW THIS “STATUTES” HAVE BEEN OUTLINED.
And please, tell me, which part of the Neocatechumenal way, which part of “the core” is not present at the statutes?
Believe me, in Spain, lost of bishops have attended for years to a Neocathecumenal community (for example, the one from Valencia or Bilbao). At USA I know, at least two of them. One at NY and other at Texas. Why they don’t report to the Pope that “heretic core”? And what about the Way youth meetings, in which there are allways LOTS of bishops? At the USA, 4 years ago, there was a bishop meeting organized by the “kikos” to present the way to all the USA bishops. Why they don’t report the pope?
Sean O L:
I have decided to also up-load the appendices to my main file at…
I think most of what you have uploaded is absolutelly true, but, if it is out fo context, noone can understand the true meaning of those phrases. Or you will understand Jesus sayin “hate your father and your mother” if you don’t know the context?
The “core” of the “kikos” is really, really simple. The cristian world needs an in-deep catecheses to understand the true value of the cristianism.
Kiko said: “Jesus Christ is not at all an ideal of life. Jesus Christ did not come to give us an example or to teach us to fulfill the law.”
WHAT kind of catholic is that??
If he did put the WHOLE text, you would understand. Kiko said: "Jesus Christ is not at all an ideal of life. Jesus Christ did not come to give us an example or to teach us to fulfill the law.
He came to fulfill the law HIMSELF, and to forgive our sins. You, me and anyone alone, CANNOT FULFILL THE LAW. Just toghether with JesusChrist we can."
It sounds better, don’t you think so?
- Kiko and his catechists have reigning authority. Something one of the catechists once said is telling, “Even priests should become part of the way and convert!”
Of course! Aren’t the priest sinners? Are they perfect?
- People who follow the Way consider themselves to be predeterminately chosen to become the salt and light of the Church and for the world.
Don’t be so fool. EVERY CATHOLIC thinks he or she has been chosen by God “since their mother’s womb”.
- Members of the Way are promised salvation by accepting the Way as a style of life that’s unique and dearly for a privileged few. Something often said by the catechists is, “If you take on this way, you will have the spirit of Jesus Christ. We feel that it’s been true for us in our lives.”
Thats ABSOLUTELLY FALSE. NOONE says that it’s the “unique” way. And on the other hand, what did the Pope said at Germany? Exactly the same: take the way of Jesus, you will have his spirit. It’s been true in my life.
- The community exerts a huge amount of pressure on its members. The members are subject to iron-handed discipline in the Way , as the catechists say, “it will bring you to the point of having to make a radical choice in your life.”
If you ever go to a community, you will start laughin of what you are writting now. Believe me, if something is true is that the “kikos” are a very “anarchic” movement.
- Followers of Kiko focus on missionary activities even if they have large families.
And what’s the problem with that?
- After the second scrutiny, members must turn over ten percent of their monthly earnings, but on top of that there are even other collections for other purposes to contribute to! No year-end budget is ever produced from all the fund-raising. The catechists justify this with the evangelical teaching, “don’t let the right hand know what the left hand is doing.” So then, I have to ask myself, why is that the Church justifiably has every parish and ecclesial body have a finance council? Contributions, income and expenses are made clear across the board.
ABSOLUTELLY FALSE AGAIN. The money of the “bag” is used to pay the community expenses. And it’s not since second scritiny, its since the very begining. And the bag goes to the hands of one of the community members, NOT THE CATECHISTS.
You know much about them, tell some truths, but you are confusing people and telling
lies. I just want to remind you: “Matthew 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and [that] he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
You know that you are telling lies, with some truths within it to confuse. Stop and think if you are offending someone that is in the need of this Way.
Bye
Think positive. 
) and never heard them say anything that was out of line with Catholic doctrine. (and I would most likely pick up on it, especially after spending so much time here for a year) They were very orthodox in their doctrine and I find it hard to believe that they would be teaching something different than Kiko taught them.
