C
Cristiano
Guest
It is not that heavy if you consider that this life is nothing compared to eternity.Thats pretty heavy.
It is not that heavy if you consider that this life is nothing compared to eternity.Thats pretty heavy.
However, puzzleannie speaks the Truth. The Church did not make this up. It comes from her Divine Spouse, Jesus Christ.Thats pretty heavy.
You are committing the sin of adultery. You are marrying the husband of another woman. Civil divorces do not mean anything in the Church. As far as the Church is concerned, your fiance is still married. This is not some man-made doctrine; this comes from Our Lord, himself:Puzzleannie,
The purpose of posting the question in this forum is to find out what it means to the Catholic Church to enter into an unrecognized marriage. I do not fault my fiance for asking how important it is to me, especially since neither of us knew what it MEANT. Only in this forum am I gaining a better understanding, so I do not really appreciate the condeming in your words.
And even STILL I feel like I keep being told I’d be committing a mortal sin, but not getting a direct answer to what sin I would be committing.
It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery (Matthew5:31-32).
This teaching goes both ways. It is something that the Church cannot change because she has no authority to edit the teaching of her Divine Spouse.Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder…Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so…And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery (Mt. 19:4-9).
Divorce
2382 The Lord Jesus insisted on the original intention of the Creator who willed that marriage be indissoluble.174 He abrogates the accommodations that had slipped into the old Law.175
2383 The separation of spouses while maintaining the marriage bond can be legitimate in certain cases provided for by canon law.177
If civil divorce remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care of the children, or the protection of inheritance, it can be tolerated and does not constitute a moral offense.
2384 Divorce is a grave offense against the natural law. It claims to break the contract, to which the spouses freely consented, to live with each other till death. Divorce does injury to the covenant of salvation, of which sacramental marriage is the sign. Contracting a new union, even if it is recognized by civil law, adds to the gravity of the rupture: the remarried spouse is then in a situation of public and permanent adultery:
***If a husband, separated from his wife, approaches another woman, he is an adulterer because he makes that woman commit adultery, and the woman who lives with him is an adulteress, because she has drawn another’s husband to herself.178 ***
You need to pray about this and speak to a priest. Again, I have to concur with puzzleannie, your eternal salvation is at stake. The problem is that heaven is something that we don’t take very seriously anymore. And, that is truly sad.2385 Divorce is immoral also because it introduces disorder into the family and into society. This disorder brings grave harm to the deserted spouse, to children traumatized by the separation of their parents and often torn between them, and because of its contagious effect which makes it truly a plague on society.
The sin being committed is fornication – having sex with someone to whom you are not married. Your partner would be committing adultery by having sex with someone while still objectively married to another person.And even STILL I feel like I keep being told I’d be committing a mortal sin, but not getting a direct answer to what sin I would be committing.
Can someone please elaborate more on WHY it is a mortal sin if he does not get his marriage annuled? It is because if the Catholic church does not recognize the marriage, (even though we are legally married) we will be considered living together in sin, having premarrital sex, and having kids out of Catholic wedlock?
Prety much except it is just “out of wedlock”. Having the kids is not really a sin but what leads up to the kids is.You would not be validly or licitly married since your “spouse” is still married in the eyes of God to the person he originally married.
AND because I am knowingly sinning according to Canon Law, that is why I cannot participate in any other Sacraments, including Reconciliation?
All Catholics are bound to follow proper form for marriage - that’s the canon law part. However, the seriously sinful part has nothing to do with form but rather living as man and wife when one party may have a valid marriage to someone else.
And only if he passes first (or his 1st spouse passes) can I participate in reconciliation (and other sacraments), because only then, am I no longer knowinly sinning? Is this correct?
You can participate in the Sacrament of Reconcilliation when you are both contrite and ready to ammend your life. In an irregular marriage that means regularizing or, in some cases, agreeing to live together as brother and sister. The other Sacraments generally require you to be in the state of grace and that generally means you have to be absolved in the Sacrament of Reconcilliation first. So you have to “pass first” by getting absolved of any sin and then re-enter the sacramental life of the Church.
Also, I beg to differ with this statement. Again, we’ve done much “research” on this also.
I’m pretty sure the law does not say we need to raise them Catholic" but to do our best to teach them about the faith. Which I believe we will be able to do better than those parents that practice with blinders.
The Church says that you - singular, the Catholic - must promise to “do your best” to raise your children in the Catholic faith. This is more than just teaching them about the faith from a distance. It involves religious ed, Sacrament prep, regular Mass etc.
Here is the quote and CL reference from the USCCBs new marriage web site:
Marriages between Catholics and non-Christians need deep discernment. We all know some that have worked and some that didn’t. I wish you the best.Because of these challenges, the church requires the Catholic party to be faithful to his or her faith and to “promise to do all in his or her power” to have their children baptized and raised in the Catholic faith. This provision of the 1983 Code of Canon Law - with its wording to try one’s best - is a change from the 1917 version, which required an absolute promise to have the children raised Catholic.
What I mean by not denying is that you have the opportunity that my grandma didn’t take advantage of back in the 1940s. Like I said, I cannot go into specifics, but, it is suffice to say that although the invalid marriage excommunicated her from the Sacraments of the Church, she did not cease going to Mass. Nor did she cease praying the Rosary, reading her Bible (I inherited her Douay Rheims and it is very dog-eared and read-through) and maintaining a devotion to the Sacred Heart. Her situation prevented her from being a full and active participant in the Church; but, she never stopped going. She truly believed that missing Mass is a mortal sin and she didn’t want to keep piling on the sins by not going.Benedictgal,
Thanks for sharing your story. That was very touching. Although, I have to say your last statement “Do not deny the children you will have the gift of the Catholic Church. Do not deny yourself the Faith of Jesus Christ that exists fully in the Church” is contradictary to your story. Your grandmother, although she was sinning, did not deny herself the church completely, nor did she deny her children and grandchildren the Catholic Church
All, thank you for your insight and advice. I am not taking any of it lightly, and will discuss with my priest and fiance.
You are committing the sin of adultery. You are marrying the husband of another woman. Civil divorces do not mean anything in the Church. As far as the Church is concerned, your fiance is still married. This is not some man-made doctrine; this comes from Our Lord, himself:
If a civil divorces do not mean anything than why would a civil marriage mean anything in the church.? If he was married in a Jewish ceremony to a Jewish woman why would the church recognize that any more than its inability to recognize a civil divorce.![]()
benedictgal;3497778:
The Church recognizes the marriages of non-Catholics, and, non-Christians, for that matter, as valid, regardless of who the parties are. The Catholic party, on the other hand, cannot have a civil wedding and expect the Church to recognize it. That is the big difference. The Catholic party must submit to the marriage guidelines of the Church, regardless of who the intended spouse is. If the spouse does not have a prior marriage, then, the situation is not complicated. However, a Catholic is obligated to marry someone who is “free to marry”, meaning, no previous marriage, or, as in the case of the OP, having the previous marriage annulled.You are committing the sin of adultery. You are marrying the husband of another woman. Civil divorces do not mean anything in the Church. As far as the Church is concerned, your fiance is still married. This is not some man-made doctrine; this comes from Our Lord, himself:
If a civil divorces do not mean anything than why would a civil marriage mean anything in the church.? If he was married in a Jewish ceremony to a Jewish woman why would the church recognize that any more than its inability to recognize a civil divorce.![]()
Chris Robinson;3497865:
So if you are not Catholic the church will recognize your civil marriage. But if you are Catholic the will not recognize your civil marriage? And in either case the church will not recognize a civil divorce?The Church recognizes the marriages of non-Catholics, and, non-Christians, for that matter, as valid, regardless of who the parties are. The Catholic party, on the other hand, cannot have a civil wedding and expect the Church to recognize it. That is the big difference. The Catholic party must submit to the marriage guidelines of the Church, regardless of who the intended spouse is. If the spouse does not have a prior marriage, then, the situation is not complicated. However, a Catholic is obligated to marry someone who is “free to marry”, meaning, no previous marriage, or, as in the case of the OP, having the previous marriage annulled.![]()
Non-Catholics are not bound to observe the Catholic form of marriage. Catholics, however, are.So if you are not Catholic the church will recognize your civil marriage. But if you are Catholic the will not recognize your civil marriage? And in either case the church will not recognize a civil divorce?![]()
yes it is indeed.Thats pretty heavy.
please do not ask a direct question if you do not want a direct answer. in your second, more elaborated post, you directly asked this question, and it has been answered. as always, all that can be offered here is a general answer to a general question. For specific guidance on your own personal situation the only place to go is to your priest. I made no comment about your fiance, I answered your question, which was, what are the implications for a Catholic who contemplates the actions about which you posted.Puzzleannie,
The purpose of posting the question in this forum is to find out what it means to the Catholic Church to enter into an unrecognized marriage. I do not fault my fiance for asking how important it is to me, especially since neither of us knew what it MEANT. Only in this forum am I gaining a better understanding, so I do not really appreciate the condeming in your words.
And even STILL I feel like I keep being told I’d be committing a mortal sin, but not getting a direct answer to what sin I would be committing.
Yes, you would be committing adultery because he is married to someone else in the Church’s eyes.Can someone please elaborate more on WHY it is a mortal sin if he does not get his marriage annuled? It is because if the Catholic church does not recognize the marriage, (even though we are legally married) we will be considered living together in sin, having premarrital sex, and having kids out of Catholic wedlock?
Yes. You can’t participate in Reconciliation because you aren’t sorry and you don’t plan to cease the adultery. And, you can’t participate in any other sacraments if you are in a state of mortal sin until you have received Reconciliation-- which you can’t do unless you are sorry and stop sinning.AND because I am knowingly sinning according to Canon Law, that is why I cannot participate in any other Sacraments, including Reconciliation? And only if he passes first (or his 1st spouse passes) can I participate in reconciliation (and other sacraments), because only then, am I no longer knowinly sinning? Is this correct?
Yes, there are many Catholics who do not know why they believe what they do. I am not one of them.Also, I beg to differ with this statement. Again, we’ve done much “research” on this also.
I believe that many Catholics practice Catholicism with blinders on. They go to church, say the prayers, and celebrate the holidays without really even knowing what they are saying, doing, and WHY.
That’s good, and you need to keep studying. You aren’t there yet if you are contemplating marrying outside the Church.Being with a non-Catholic, I have been forced to really look at Catholicism so that I could explain to my partner our beliefs and WHY things are done. I believe that since I have been forced to really look at my religion, (only after a few months) I already understand it better (truer) than I did going to mass every Sunday growing up and all the 8 years of CCD classes. And I’m learning more and more each week.
You are wrong. See above.I’m pretty sure the law does not say we need to raise them Catholic" but to do our best to teach them about the faith.
I am a very strong opponent of mixed marriages. However, I did not make any statements on that topic. I only answered your questions.I know there are strong opinions for and against interfaith marriages. And I don’t want to make this a debate about that. I’m just trying to understand the topic of and “unrecognized marriage”.
Thank you. There are over 300 couples in this group (1 of a small number of groups in our area), and 0 divorces. I attribute the great track record to it forces you to really analyse the relationship to see if it is worth it. And I believe it really opens up the lines of communication not only about religion and kids, but almost everything, at least for us.Marriages between Catholics and non-Christians need deep discernment. We all know some that have worked and some that didn’t. I wish you the best.
Thank you. There are over 300 couples in this group (1 of a small number of groups in our area), and 0 divorces. I attribute the great track record to it forces you to really analyse the relationship to see if it is worth it. And I believe it really opens up the lines of communication not only about religion and kids, but almost everything, at least for us.Marriages between Catholics and non-Christians need deep discernment. We all know some that have worked and some that didn’t. I wish you the best.