It’s your claim. The sources you (apparently) rely on (given your linking to Wikipedia) are made up of anonymous blogs (which don’t cite sources), cheerleaders of homosexual activity, and in general, non-scholarly writings. You don’t seem to understand how to make a claim; you have to use good sources before anyone is to take you seriously.
**Eh, do you not realize that the use of boys by older Afghan men is very, very well-documented? All you had to do was google “dancing boys Afghanistan” to find as many articles and citations as you can read.
washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/afganistans-dancing-boys-are-invisible-victims/2012/04/04/gIQAyreSwS_story.html**
Note that the tenure of Afghan dancing boys mentioned in the Washington Post piece is almost exactly the same as for “youths” in Ancient Greece: ““When he starts growing a beard, his time will expire, and I will try to find another one who doesn’t have a beard,” Assadula said.”
**Believe it or not, “cheerleaders of homosexual activity” are very unlikely to want to draw a line between themselves and Afghan pederasty or Greek pederasty. (It is true, though, that there is widespread misrepresentation of the nature of ancient Greek homosexuality, which was far closer to Afghan pederasty than to modern gay marriage.)
**
So instead you’ve encountered this information in an unstructured manner, which does not provided the proper context and background for it (not that a typical college education does either, deliberately or not).
**So, if I understand you correctly:
- information learned in college is worthless
and
- information picked up on one’s own is equally worthless.
Come on–where are we supposed to learn from, if not from either college or personal reading?
**
You have backpedaled considerably from your original comment, I see.
???
What I find interesting is how little your wide-ranging belief is based on. It’s not that you have a desire to believe what LGBT activists want you to believe (and they care even less about scholarly methods), but that you’re realizing cognitive biases are at work here. For example, the illusory truth effect and the anchoring bias. The media definitely plays a role in leading people to believe things without even having to lie about it (per se). There are many millennials who believe that homosexuals make up 30% of the US population - they haven’t been explicitly lied to, but the media has led (or allowed) them to believe false things (cognitive biases at work, again).