What in your opinion is specifically wrong with modern American Television?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
TV caters to the lowest common denominator in society. TV is aimed at people who are “average” on their best day.
I disagree. There is plenty of TV out there that’s not NASA TV or the like that is not catering to the LCD either. Now if you’re watching nothing but TLC and other reality TV then yes, obviously that mind numbing drivel does cater to the LCD. But that’s not the end all of what’s on our TVs today. Not even close.
 
The NASA channel, proudly watched by about 36 Americans.

See, smarm isn’t attractive when you get it back.

But I double down that mainstream US TV is aimed at the lowest common denominator of viewers.’
As Padres said there are a wide variety of things on television. Not all shows carter to everyone. Examples would be shows on PBS, Discovery, Animal Planet, The Science Channel. Yeah if all you watch is shows like Cops, most reality tv or some talk shows then yeah it caters to s specific groups of people but a blanket statement appears to show you in a light as very narrow minded.
 
I work in a library. Actually, in some patrons I’ve seen, they get books for their kids and use that as another baby sitter than the TV. I don’t watch much TV myself, my mom mostly has her Spanish soap operas on record. What little I do watch is professional wrestling. You can also watch TV and do all those other things.
 
It’s entertaining to be called “narrow minded” over my view of TV viewers, by someone who admits that most of what they watch on TV is professional wrestling.

Talk about programming aimed at low level viewers.

Look, if you scroll around cable tv you can find numerous shows with value. However, the vast majority of shows - including essentially everything on the big 3 networks; much programming aimed at Tweens; essentially all modern sitcoms; much of reality programming; and much of what is on premium channels - is aimed at very low levels of viewers, because there are more of them than anyone else. There just aren’t too many people watching the NASA channel, but there are LOTS of people watching Jerry Springer and Maury Povich.

Note I didn’t even mention what is essentially the most watched programming in America, namely, professional sports, (not wrestling!) to which Americans appear to be addicted.
 
Just way too dark - too many police procedurals and shows about serial killers and cannibals and the like - there needs to be a balance of lighter programming with heart that shows life isn’t all a bleak struggle.
That’s one of the reasons I like watching the Hallmark channel.
 
It’s entertaining to be called “narrow minded” over my view of TV viewers, by someone who admits that most of what they watch on TV is professional wrestling.

Talk about programming aimed at low level viewers.

Look, if you scroll around cable tv you can find numerous shows with value. However, the vast majority of shows - including essentially everything on the big 3 networks; much programming aimed at Tweens; essentially all modern sitcoms; much of reality programming; and much of what is on premium channels - is aimed at very low levels of viewers, because there are more of them than anyone else. There just aren’t too many people watching the NASA channel, but there are LOTS of people watching Jerry Springer and Maury Povich.

Note I didn’t even mention what is essentially the most watched programming in America, namely, professional sports, (not wrestling!) to which Americans appear to be addicted.
Wow talk about judging for no reason just because someone likes a type of entertainment. Sorry not everyone watches EWTN or The Blaze 24/7. Everyone is different and TV has a wide variety of shows. You watch what you like.
 
Everything in moderation.
For young children especially, long hours passively staring at the thing is not good.
 
Carol Burnett on the State of Comedy TV: "I’m Kind of Bored of Producers Saying, ‘It’s Got to Be Edgy’"
Funny is funny. I dare anyone to look at Tim Conway and Harvey Korman doing the dentist sketch, which is more than 40 years old, and not scream with laughter. But I am kind of bored of producers saying, “It’s got to be edgy.” Edgy is fine — I’m not a prude by any stretch of the imagination — but what’s wrong with a good ol’ belly laugh? I miss that. A lot of comedy today is so fast — it’s like: “Boom! Boom! Boom!” — because they think people can’t pay enough attention. Barry Levinson [who wrote for The Carol Burnett Show before becoming a director] and Rudy De Luca wrote one of my favorite sketches. It was called “The Pail,” and in it, Harvey is my psychiatrist and I’m having a session with him. It takes about five or six minutes into the sketch until we got our first laugh, but it built and built and built, and the punch line was great. It’s about a girl who was traumatized by a bully in the sandbox when she was 6 years old, and he stole her little pail — and it turns out the psychiatrist was the bully. It is absolutely hysterical, but it took all that time to build. Today the suits say, “It’s got to be fast.” So I think some of the writing isn’t good anymore. Now sitcoms sound like they’ve been written by teenage boys in a locker room.
hollywoodreporter.com/features/carol-burnett-state-comedy-tv-859167
 
Everyone is having sex. If someone isn’t, they are CRAZY. I’d obviously like to see a major turn around, but even if not that, just include some examples of people living in chastity who are normal, healthy people and not weirdos, and let that be accepted.
 
Everyone is having sex. If someone isn’t, they are CRAZY. I’d obviously like to see a major turn around, but even if not that, just include some examples of people living in chastity who are normal, healthy people and not weirdos, and let that be accepted.
As much as I hate to admit it, ‘popular tv’ has a huge impact on society, they push casual sex because that is the type of society they want to see, they push acceptance of SSM, and other similar things because they have an agenda they are pushing, any mention of God or church in popular tv is portrayed as old, outdated, this is the enemy hard at work imo.

What is strange though, and Ive said it before, while they push casual sex, no religion of any kind, acceptance of the immoral, it is still taboo (and illegal) to air any major curse words, nudity of ANY kind, I remember all the controversy over NYPD blue, in the early 90s, airing rear ends…this was the 90s, but its still taboo?? Ive never understood why they seem to be OK pushing these types of things, but wont take it a step further and fight to air what they really want to. I doubt the enemy cares about these things.

Its just strange in this modern tv world, when so much is now accepted by society, yet they still abide by the FCC laws, and no one even suggests doing away with them…??
 
Wow talk about judging for no reason just because someone likes a type of entertainment. Sorry not everyone watches EWTN or The Blaze 24/7. Everyone is different and TV has a wide variety of shows. You watch what you like.
You’re comparing EWTN to The Blaze?
 
Everyone is having sex. If someone isn’t, they are CRAZY. I’d obviously like to see a major turn around, but even if not that, just include some examples of people living in chastity who are normal, healthy people and not weirdos, and let that be accepted.
Well, yes.

Ed
 
Btw Married with Children has not been around for ages. A funny show but no longer around.
Nothing funny about that show.

We went from true humor and funny situations to cheap, embarrassing put down humor where everyone was an idiot and the target of derision.

IMHO, the sitcom never recovered and they’re all like that show now-unfunny…
 
Nothing funny about that show.

We went from true humor and funny situations to cheap, embarrassing put down humor where everyone was an idiot and the target of derision.

IMHO, the sitcom never recovered and they’re all like that show now-unfunny…
I have no idea what you were watching. MWC was super funny.
 
Nothing funny about that show.

We went from true humor and funny situations to cheap, embarrassing put down humor where everyone was an idiot and the target of derision.

IMHO, the sitcom never recovered and they’re all like that show now-unfunny…
I hated that show when it was popular, I think many men just watched it do see how scantily clad they would dress Christina Applegate! I will admit, i was like 12 at the time and did the same thing.

You are right, just about all the ‘sit coms’ today are about the same, the husband or guy is portrayed as a nim wit, the kids are as well, and the mom or main female is the only smart one!
 
Nothing funny about that show.

We went from true humor and funny situations to cheap, embarrassing put down humor where everyone was an idiot and the target of derision.

IMHO, the sitcom never recovered and they’re all like that show now-unfunny…
You bring up a good point about American sitcoms not recovering from that point. But I would say MWC was symptomatic of a greater lack of creativity in the entertainment world.
The great comedians of yesteryear are gone. They did all the footwork around the country in vaudeville and nightclubs before they became famous in movies, radio or TV. In England they called it ‘music hall’. They had the real world experience that resonated with audiences.
Today’s crop of comedic ‘talent’ sees the world only through the eyes of southern California and what their corporate bosses tell them is ‘funny’.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top